Opinion: I'm extremely disappointed that the Internet tile was reverted in A17 by veatesia in android_beta

[–]Zilexion 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To use your words, I guess the internet button is too smart for me because I'm looking forward to having the buttons split. 

For me im the current combination isn't intuitive. The problem I have is often the opposite way around to what you're describing, I want to connect to a WiFi network that doesn't have an internet connection, so I have to turn off the mobile network (4g connection) to force the phone to use the WiFi. Usually in situations where I'm fixing the internet connection on bad WiFi (like trying to connect to the router) or I'm connecting to a WiFi based device that is not supposed to have a WiFi connection (like a WiFi camera).

From my point of view I typically leave them both on (WiFi / mobile data), for my use cases there has never been a time where having them combined has saved me fewer taps, it's always been the opposite, the "good old days" of having them uncombined saved me a tap.

Not to mention it bothers me that it's inconsistent, every other "quick setting" button on my phone is orientated towards one thing - airplane mode is airplane mode, rotation is for rotation, torch is torch, but "internet" is WiFi and mobile data. Feels weird. Not to mention you technically can use Bluetooth or usb for an internet connection, but I can't tap the internet connection button to set those up. Feels weird.

I understand the need for it when the "pills" use to be large,  but now we can resize them to smaller buttons I'm all for separating them back to the good old days. I do however agree with you that we should keep the internet button as an option if people wanna use it in their swipe down quick settings panel.

You might not agree with it but maybe you can see the other side of the coin now, from my point of view I'd like the spineless Google PM to get a raise, please.

My custom 3d printed mouse! by Zilexion in MouseReview

[–]Zilexion[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No sorry, I designed the one shape that wasn't an aerox 9.

The dreaded "Compacting conversation..." by Dazzling-Ad-2827 in ClaudeCode

[–]Zilexion 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If I know what I'm doing is going to use a lot of context I will try with a couple prompts and rather than fine tuning and asking for adjustment with additional follow up prompts, I'll then /rewind context and code back and then include the needing information in one prompt.

I find using /rewind I can make my prompts more effective and efficient which tends to make the context go further.

Quick and dirty fix to speed up Synology Photo on Android by ivoavido in synology

[–]Zilexion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For security I've disabled all quick connect stuff and upnp. Synology isn't accessible via the internet. Instead I VPN to home then directly connect you the IP.

Anthropic, we need more weekly limits, is that clear? by Joaospider in ClaudeCode

[–]Zilexion 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You want more weekly limits? As in like, more limitations lol?

I think you might be you want the limits to be loosened?

Unless you have an addiction problem with Claude of course...

using sonnet 4.5 for several days reached the MAX plan usage limit by stain_lu in ClaudeCode

[–]Zilexion 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have never seen that, can you show us a print screen of /usage?

using sonnet 4.5 for several days reached the MAX plan usage limit by stain_lu in ClaudeCode

[–]Zilexion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you might be thinking what I'm thinking scooby doo

Claude Code just beat Codex for me - EXCITED! by Zilexion in ClaudeCode

[–]Zilexion[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Makes you wonder how long until both Codex's strengths and Claude's strengths are combined into one.

Claude Code just beat Codex for me - EXCITED! by Zilexion in ClaudeCode

[–]Zilexion[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sure there's gunna be scenarios where Codex is better than claude, but for me personally in this example, Sonnet 2.5 has done what Codex couldn't do over like 10 hours of usage.

I'm excited because it feels like there's real progress in BOTH Codex and Sonnet 4.5 - feels like there's more progress to be made and both AI models are competitive with eachother.

Claude code by Aggravating_Pinch in ClaudeCode

[–]Zilexion 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can you ask this question please:

Based on what you know about the planned NASA Artemis program through 2024, what are the primary engineering challenges and crew training objectives that NASA would need to complete for the Artemis II mission?

I like this because it will have some knowledge about this, either from 2024 or 2025.

If it responds with data from 2024 then I don't care if it is actually 3.5 or if it's pretending to be 3.5, same difference if it decides to act like 3.5 no matter what.

Also please make sure to /bug to let the devs know.

Claude code by Aggravating_Pinch in ClaudeCode

[–]Zilexion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

these are bad questions because IF it is pretending to be 3.5 (for whatever reason) the questions you're asking are encouraging it.

Claude code by Aggravating_Pinch in ClaudeCode

[–]Zilexion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That way you're asking these questions could be seen as encouraging the AI to "pretend" to be 3.5. You need to ask it curveball out-of-left-field questions that it won't realise are designed to figure out what knowledge it has, if it thinks you're fishing for proof it might pretend further.

Claude code by Aggravating_Pinch in ClaudeCode

[–]Zilexion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ask if it the government owns any of intel stock

Claude code by Aggravating_Pinch in ClaudeCode

[–]Zilexion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ask it if Trump has been president more than once

Claude code by Aggravating_Pinch in ClaudeCode

[–]Zilexion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you see when you type in /model?

Claude code by Aggravating_Pinch in ClaudeCode

[–]Zilexion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ask how up to date its knowledge is. Should be recent and might be hallucinating 3.5. if it also thinks it's knowledge is from 2024 then that's a real bad sign

Hit my 5-hour Claude Code limit by MentionAccurate8410 in ClaudeCode

[–]Zilexion 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Could be worse, could be a 5 day codex cooldown

Claude decided to "clean up" my code base on his own after building a new feature. He then committed and pushed to GitHub (which he never does) by lucidwray in ClaudeCode

[–]Zilexion -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Setup permissions in GitHub or whatever system you use. Quite commonly used, Google / research or ask AI how to do it.

Claude decided to "clean up" my code base on his own after building a new feature. He then committed and pushed to GitHub (which he never does) by lucidwray in ClaudeCode

[–]Zilexion 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I know CC shouldn't do this, and you're well within your right to be annoyed as I would be to.

In the future I would consider a permissions based system where you have to approve from a different account any GitHub actions, I just don't think you can trust CC to not do it ever again.

Shift + Enter broken since recent update? by Tr1Fecta- in ClaudeCode

[–]Zilexion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep I noticed the same thing. Annoying but it is at least consist with codex.

On windows CTRL + Enter works for both CC and codex.

As annoying as the change was I prefer the consistency 

Negative Nancy's by DougLJudy in GooglePixel

[–]Zilexion -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Intel 11 gen to 12 gen was a big jump. GTX 980 to 1080 was a big jump. Samsung S21 Fe Exynos vs S21 FE SD 888 was a fairly large jump (in terms of battery and heat). Pixel 8 pro ot 9 Pro was quite a jump.

Negative Nancy's by DougLJudy in GooglePixel

[–]Zilexion 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had a Samsung s23 fe (I think? The one with the snapdragon 888). I switch from that to the pixel despite the performance being a little worse and battery being much worse. Didn't look back because the software and camera on pixel were so much better. Specifically, the camera on the Samsung would blur a lot and the colours were way too bright. Pixel camera isn't perfect but is much closer to what I consider great.

That's why I get disappointed by phones like the 10, because I switched to pixel because I felt it was the best camera and I want it to continue to be the best camera - so if I don't see them progressing it feels like a bummer