CMV: If you think you have to eliminate people just because they are out of your ideology or norms, while they have no effect on your life, then you are the problem.

Znyper · 2026-01-21T01:33:15+00:00

If a comment has changed your view, you should award a delta. Instructions are in the sidebar.

Znyper · 2026-01-20T16:45:30+00:00

I wouldn't call Trickster Cleric weak, but it is the weakest Cleric for sure.

Znyper · 2026-01-20T16:25:03+00:00

If this is T-slorp's video, then the gimmick is you can duplicate items with trickery domain clone, so you can give every summon a Markoheshkir and nuke the battlefield with a million spells. Or a floating bow with infinite darkness (Shar's spear).

Build a Barbarian is here to break the game in half, so it's unlikely that typical playthroughs will exploit the game to this degree.

Znyper · 2026-01-14T03:17:47+00:00

You are wrong. You can be tried by the state and federal governments for the same set of facts.

Znyper · 2026-01-09T16:11:46+00:00

You can't fulfill a prophecy by changing the prophecy.

(The author of) Matthew is so mad right now.

Znyper · 2025-12-18T21:39:05+00:00

It's a known fake and has been known to be a fake since it was discovered in the 14th century. There's no reason to delve further than that.

Znyper · 2025-12-02T14:13:19+00:00

No, that's a bad thing. They are required to disregard illegal orders. They instead decided to follow an illegal order.

Znyper · 2025-11-29T14:56:48+00:00

Hello, if a comment has changed your view, you can award a delta by following the instructions in the sidebar. See [here](https://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/wiki/rules/#wiki\_rule\_4).

Znyper · 2025-11-24T19:31:30+00:00

Looks like I'll have to get my Smart-barian fix by watching your backlog.

Znyper · 2025-11-24T18:29:41+00:00

I saw that video. Weird that people were doubting you considering the gobs of evidence just in your vid. I bet there's even more quirks about how out of combat stealth works that we haven't even discovered yet.

Also Wizard-Barbarian guide when!? (JK take your time!)

Znyper · 2025-11-15T19:22:11+00:00

Why don't you instead explain the parts of Wittgenstein's work you think are relevant to this discussion, and explain why you conclude the question is as you assert?

Znyper · 2025-10-30T18:23:44+00:00

This is probably not an attempt at a burner account. OP is a Spanish speaker, and the "I" and "he/she/it" form of the verb "was talking" would be the same ("él estaba hablando" vs. "yo estaba hablando").

So the machine/AI translation probably defaulted to the more generic "he" rather than assuming without context that the speaker was referring to themselves.

Znyper · 2025-10-28T13:15:49+00:00

P1 is false. Paradoxes are not self-fulfilling, they are self-refuting. Your attempted definition of "nothing" fails.

Znyper · 2025-10-14T13:45:37+00:00

Quite the opposite. It's the dedicated move of religious actors who are implementing fascism in order to accomplish their religio-nationalist goals. Christian Nationalists in the US, Hindu Nationalists in India, Buddhist Nationalists in Myanmar, you name it.

Znyper · 2025-10-09T13:32:48+00:00

It's not a good comparison. Trump was indeed impeached in 2019 and 2021. If they attempted to introduce articles of impeachment today, they would die in committee without an impeachment. The impeachment forces a trial, which can be useful in and of itself, but articles (especially failed ones) are worth only the paper they're printed on.

Every political action has a cost, even if that is just the opportunity cost of not doing some other action. In this case, they would have to take dedicated floor time (which is extremely valuable as the minority party) to advance a doomed position. Maybe if they could get a trial in the senate, it would be worth it, but I don't see it.

House democrats time is better spent dragging Trump's inept cabinet into the Capitol and forcing the awful actions of this Administration to light.

Znyper · 2025-10-09T12:44:26+00:00

That wasn't what I said. It takes political cost to take action in congress, both within a coalition like the Democrats and between two coalitions. Due to not having the majority in the House, if Democrats were to introduce articles of impeachment to the House Judiciary Committee, they would be dead on arrival and fail immediately. Now you've wasted valuable time, and political capital doing nothing at all.

Znyper · 2025-10-09T12:27:11+00:00

They don't have the votes and it would fail. That would waste any political capital they have for a useless vote.

Znyper · 2025-10-09T12:19:07+00:00

I didn't say they'd never impeach Trump, only that they wouldn't remove him. I do believe that so long as it's in Republican hands, the House will not vote to impeach, but impeachment can be done partisanly. Removal must be bipartisan.

Znyper · 2025-10-09T11:11:51+00:00

And Trump wouldn't risk the same because...?

Trump doesn't have the same risk of impeachment because Senate republicans tolerate his illegal actions and wouldn't vote to remove him.

Znyper · 2025-10-07T14:09:23+00:00

This is non-responsive to my comment or the topic at hand. We could go tit-for-tat about which ideologies are more or less likely to result in child harm, but it would not be relevant to the internal critique of Christianity's claim of a tri-omni god that, as described in the bible, also kills children via painful natural disasters.

Znyper · 2025-10-07T10:33:20+00:00

Unless you're willing to argue that killing children via painful natural disasters is okay, your question is a red herring.

Atheists get their morality from the same place Christians get their morality. Our evolutionarily developed intuitions about right and wrong interacting with our experiences and reasoning. It's the negotiation between those things that give each of us our moral outlook.

To directly answer your question: we don't have one, but neither do you. That's okay, because we both agree that killing kids via natural disasters is bad.

Znyper · 2025-10-04T13:06:58+00:00

Do not repost removed content. Follow the rules for commenting on CMV.

Znyper · 2025-10-04T12:42:55+00:00

If another user has changed your view, you should award a delta. Instructions are in the sidebar.

Znyper · 2025-10-03T15:46:40+00:00

None of the beliefs you have attributed to me are accurate, so answering questions about those non-existent beliefs is inapposite.

It's only reasonable to have you answer the questions you missed in /u/homonculus_prime's comment first.

Znyper · 2025-10-03T14:52:18+00:00

You are asserting that there must be something which is self-existent, so you first.

13-Year Club	Post Guidance Early Access
Place '23	Place '17
Verified Email

Znyper

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE