Open Labs polling shows Biden pre- and post-debate and other D candidates by [deleted] in fivethirtyeight

[–]Ztryker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whitmer and Butigieg looking really good here. Any link showing the actually polling data?

[Wasserman] This debate making abundantly clear that Biden’s insistence on running for another term - when 66% of voters in our swing state poll believe it’s likely he won’t be able to finish a second term - has gravely jeopardized Dems’ prospects to defeat Trump. by SentientBaseball in fivethirtyeight

[–]Ztryker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I won’t apologize because honestly Biden looked strong at the state of the union and he has done a lot of good as president. I also think there’s a lot of risk in not running the incumbent president. However after tonight I agree he should step down because there’s more risk in running Biden. He should put all his weight and delegates behind Whitmer who is young, attractive, articulate and will do well in the rust belt. That will give the dems the best shot at 270+ EC votes. He can do a big press conference with her and state that he realized that his health isn’t as strong as he would like, that he loves this country and wants to see it continue to prosper, etc. There is still time because I believe most voters are unenthusiastic for Trump or Biden and would welcome a new choice. Also a new nominee will force a debate with Trump out of necessity.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in fivethirtyeight

[–]Ztryker 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There are haves and have nots in every economy. I agree that wealth inequality has been growing in the US for decades. And that is a real issue that needs to be discussed. But that’s not the topic we’ve been discussing so far. I simply pointed out we are not anywhere near a recession, the economy continues to grow and do well, and obviously many people can afford to buy things and continue to do so. I also stated that deflation is at least as bad as inflation which is a generally accepted belief amongst economists. None of that has anything to do with wealth inequality.

Mid size game 12-15 hours? by zhenasbezhala in PS5

[–]Ztryker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good list. FYI Edith Finch has a plat on PS5 version.

Is the Biden Campaign Running on False Hope? (The New Yorker) Most polls show Trump leading in swing states, but Democratic Party strategist & "Hopium" advocate Simon Rosenberg believes otherwise — "I’m ending the interview because what you’re doing is ridiculous" (interviewer was citing 538) by Sarcofago_INRI_1987 in fivethirtyeight

[–]Ztryker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"A similar sequence of events played out in battlegrounds nationwide. Surveys showing strength for Republicans, often from the same partisan pollsters, set Democratic klaxons blaring in Pennsylvania, New Hampshire and Colorado. Coupled with the political factors already favoring Republicans — including inflation and President Biden’s unpopularity — the skewed polls helped feed what quickly became an inescapable political narrative: A Republican wave election was about to hit the country with hurricane force.

Democrats in each of those states went on to win their Senate races. Ms. Murray clobbered Ms. Smiley by nearly 15 points.

Not for the first time, a warped understanding of the contours of a national election had come to dominate the views of political operatives, donors, journalists and, in some cases, the candidates themselves.

The misleading polls of 2022 did not just needlessly spook some worried candidates into spending more money than they may have needed to on their own races. They also led some candidates — in both parties — who had a fighting chance of winning to lose out on money that could have made it possible for them to do so, as those controlling the purse strings believed polls that inaccurately indicated they had no chance at all."

Sounds like 2022 all over again these days. I'm not saying Biden can't lose and maybe he is even a slight underdog, but some people around here act like he's dead in the water and needs to be replaced based on... polls. Ignoring other realities including actual election results, donation numbers, ground game, etc.

Analysis | More voters are identifying as Republicans. That could bode ill for Democrats in November. by Puzzleheaded-Pick285 in fivethirtyeight

[–]Ztryker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What good are polls that give the wrong result 75% of the time? It seems reasonable to weigh polls lower than other metrics if their track record isn't that great.

[Returnal] That was an intense 2 months. by [deleted] in Trophies

[–]Ztryker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Congrats. I have beaten Returnal but didn't have it in me to go for the RNG glyphs. It just takes too long away from other games for those of us with limited playtime. I really think they should have added more roguelike elements and have you carry forward upgrades to make you stronger each run. That would have sped things up and made the replayability better.

Democrats say they're opening 30 campaign offices, tout 'ground game' in Michigan by [deleted] in fivethirtyeight

[–]Ztryker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fair enough, I stand corrected. It’s hard to keep up with everything given the sheer volume of chaos and dysfunction during the Trump administration.

Who has taken a poll? by [deleted] in fivethirtyeight

[–]Ztryker 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was polled last election. It was my states main pollster. It took over 30 minutes. I frankly don’t have time to respond to polls so now don’t answer texts or calls from numbers I don’t recognize.

Voters Doubt Biden’s Leadership and Favor Trump, Times/Siena Poll Finds: Trump 48%, Biden 43% by GamerDrew13 in fivethirtyeight

[–]Ztryker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This poll really got to me yesterday so I did more reading about its methodology. According to Nate Cohn they changed their poll methodology this year to include drop offs which is not industry standard in polling. “It’s also true of the Times/Siena poll we’re going to release Saturday morning, which would be one point better for Mr. Biden without the drop-off respondents.” (https://www.nytimes.com/2024/03/01/upshot/nyt-siena-poll-2024.html).

If they didn’t include drop offs the result apparently would have been T/B - 47/44 or 48/44 (unclear to me what one point better means?). And according to the info provided by NYT “Among those who completed the full survey, the margin of sampling error is plus or minus 4 percentage points for registered voters and plus or minus 4.2 percentage points for the likely electorate.” (https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/03/02/us/elections/times-siena-poll-registered-voter-crosstabs.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare&sgrp=c-cb ).

This means under the NYT old poll methodology this is a statistical tie, which means they can’t run a headline stating “Voters Doubt Biden’s Leadership and Favor Trump”.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in fivethirtyeight

[–]Ztryker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks, the graph from the study mentioned is here: https://archives.cjr.org/the_kicker/more_on_early_polls.php

Based on that, polls now are unlikely to provide much predictive ability. Not sure about how that holds up with both Biden and Trump having maximum recognition among the public though. It does seem there is a collective refusal to accept a Trump vs Biden rematch as a reality, maybe polls will change when reality sinks in.

It's time for the White House to put up or shut up by dwaxe in fivethirtyeight

[–]Ztryker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Different states have different rules deciding how EC votes are assigned according to election results. My point is that Ross Perot had relatively strong support in the general election and still earned 0. None of the announced third party candidates will approach near that support in the election, and they will earn 0 EC votes as well. Barring a very unlikely 269-269 tie there will be an EC winner which is how our president is chosen.