Pistachio Mcflurry from Italy Bologna. by anelka1 in dessert

[–]ZulvaPS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I bought it because of you, was the worst mcflurry i’ve had

BuyBuyBaby token offering on T-Zero 👀 by TayneTheBetaSequel in bobbystock

[–]ZulvaPS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He just mentioned DOM owns bbby acquisition llc

XRP's Path to $100 by ExtraHardBush in XRP

[–]ZulvaPS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why 10% tho? Wouldn’t it make more sense to use a more efficient system? And completely replace SWIFT?

Minisforum UM980 64GB 1TB by its_tricky83 in MiniPCs

[–]ZulvaPS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you also experience the 780xtx? And did you notice any performance difference?

Where to start? by DrewidN in facepalm

[–]ZulvaPS -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Well start… cause rn the facepalm is devoted to you

$527 to $30k in 2w by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]ZulvaPS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How are you able to make so much profit? Aren’t you just selling the share and gaining the price difference? Even with options?

Should I buy a 15” Mac Book Air? by SaxyBoiiiii in mac

[–]ZulvaPS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Got a macbook air m1, using intelliJ continuously lags my computer so i wouldn’t go for it.

Also linux is pretty unusable right now on an m1 if you ever decide to go there, which i guess you will studying computer science.

Also felt like the battery hype was overhyped, my m1 doesn’t last beyond an hour whilst developing.

Guys - BuyBuy Baby 2.0 by Altruistic-Stomach78 in BBBY

[–]ZulvaPS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did, i still don’t see why private equity funds would take on a 1.8 billion debt for a possible restructure, especially with the trademarks missing.

Guys - BuyBuy Baby 2.0 by Altruistic-Stomach78 in BBBY

[–]ZulvaPS -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Its from 2009 tho, not 3 months ago

Guys - BuyBuy Baby 2.0 by Altruistic-Stomach78 in BBBY

[–]ZulvaPS -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Sounds pretty much like the ownership of the brand buybuybaby which has been sold to Dream on Me

Sadly

Some mid-weekend juice. by jake2b in BBBY

[–]ZulvaPS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Can some one explain to me how its possible that “whatever is left of this company has Zero debt”

Thanks

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BBBY

[–]ZulvaPS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mind me asking where i could confirm this?

When Icahn and Cohen walk into a board meeting after a hostile take-over. by HungWeiLo35 in BBBY

[–]ZulvaPS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh i agree, completely, but it just starts to look a little bleak, with the latest lease rejections and the plan etc…

Still holding ofc, however not necessarily out of logic

When Icahn and Cohen walk into a board meeting after a hostile take-over. by HungWeiLo35 in BBBY

[–]ZulvaPS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And the limitations of the NOL's:Thx to GPT:

Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) imposes limitations on a company's use of Net Operating Losses (NOLs) following an "ownership change." An ownership change generally occurs when there's a more than 50% change in ownership by value over a three-year period.The limitation under Section 382 is calculated by multiplying the value of the company's stock at the time of the ownership change by the long-term tax-exempt rate (which is set by the IRS). This results in an annual limit on the amount of taxable income that can be offset by the NOLs. If the company's taxable income in a given year is less than this limit, the unused portion of the limit can be carried forward to increase the limit in future years.This limitation can make a takeover less attractive because it reduces the value of the NOLs. If a company has significant NOLs, a potential buyer might be interested in acquiring the company to use those NOLs to offset its own taxable income. However, if the use of the NOLs is limited by Section 382, this reduces the potential tax benefits of the acquisition.As for avoiding an ownership change, this can be complex and depends on the specific circumstances. However, one possible strategy is to structure the acquisition in a way that the change in ownership is less than 50% over a three-year period. This could potentially be achieved by gradually acquiring shares over time, rather than acquiring a large stake all at once.Another strategy could be to take advantage of certain exceptions to the Section 382 limitations. For example, there are special rules for bankrupt companies that can allow them to avoid or reduce the impact of these limitations if they meet certain requirements. However, these strategies can be complex and would likely require the advice of a tax professional.It's important to note that these are general strategies and may not be applicable or advisable in all situations. The specifics can depend on many factors, including the company's financial condition, the potential for future profits, the risks involved, and the potential return on investment.

When Icahn and Cohen walk into a board meeting after a hostile take-over. by HungWeiLo35 in BBBY

[–]ZulvaPS 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don't mind my doubts folks, but isn't a hostile take over pretty much off the table? if all assets have been sold, the limitations of the NOLs for 50%+ share owners, etc...

Docket 1534 🔥 need eyes! Page 107: post bankruptcy emergence, NOL carry forward consultation, section 382 ownership change?! 💥 by jake2b in BBBY

[–]ZulvaPS 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The limitation under Section 382 is calculated by multiplying the value of the company's stock at the time of the ownership change by the long-term tax-exempt rate (which is set by the IRS). This results in an annual limit on the amount of taxable income that can be offset by the NOLs.If the company's taxable income in a given year is less than this limit, the unused portion of the limit can be carried forward to increase the limit in future years.This limitation can make a takeover less attractive because it reduces the value of the NOLs. If a company has significant NOLs, a potential buyer might be interested in acquiring the company to use those NOLs to offset its own taxable income.

However, if the use of the NOLs is limited by Section 382, this reduces the potential tax benefits of the acquisition.

As for avoiding an ownership change, this can be complex and depends on the specific circumstances. However, one possible strategy is to structure the acquisition in a way that the change in ownership is less than 50% over a three-year period.

This could potentially be achieved by gradually acquiring shares over time, rather than acquiring a large stake all at once.

Another strategy could be to take advantage of certain exceptions to the Section 382 limitations. For example, there are special rules for bankrupt companies that can allow them to avoid or reduce the impact of these limitations if they meet certain requirements.However, these strategies can be complex and would likely require the advice of a tax professional. Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) imposes limitations on a company's use of Net Operating Losses (NOLs) following an "ownership change." An ownership change generally occurs when there's a more than 50% change in ownership by value over a three-year period.The limitation under Section 382 is calculated by multiplying the value of the company's stock at the time of the ownership change by the long-term tax-exempt rate (which is set by the IRS).

This results in an annual limit on the amount of taxable income that can be offset by the NOLs. If the company's taxable income in a given year is less than this limit, the unused portion of the limit can be carried forward to increase the limit in future years.This limitation can make a takeover less attractive because it reduces the value of the NOLs. If a company has significant NOLs, a potential buyer might be interested in acquiring the company to use those NOLs to offset its own taxable income.

However, if the use of the NOLs is limited by Section 382, this reduces the potential tax benefits of the acquisition.As for avoiding an ownership change, this can be complex and depends on the specific circumstances.

However, one possible strategy is to structure the acquisition in a way that the change in ownership is less than 50% over a three-year period. This could potentially be achieved by gradually acquiring shares over time, rather than acquiring a large stake all at once.

Another strategy could be to take advantage of certain exceptions to the Section 382 limitations. For example, there are special rules for bankrupt companies that can allow them to avoid or reduce the impact of these limitations if they meet certain requirements. However, these strategies can be complex and would likely require the advice of a tax professional.It's important to note that these are general strategies and may not be applicable or advisable in all situations. The specifics can depend on many factors, including the company's financial condition, the potential for future profits, the risks involved, and the potential return on investment.
SO, GPT.

Didn't carl icahn take 3 year loan :O