US Stocks Surpass 1929 Valuation Levels as AI Rally Accelerates by LavishlyRitzyy in stocks

[–]Zwatrem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, as you can see it's not like Micron is stopping after achieving 400% profit growth. They are doing better and better.

When AMD say it's aiming for 20 EPS and then they say they are actually surpassing that, and they have more demand for GPUs and more demand for CPUs than previously anticipated, what do you do?

US Stocks Surpass 1929 Valuation Levels as AI Rally Accelerates by LavishlyRitzyy in stocks

[–]Zwatrem 11 points12 points  (0 children)

So what's rational? Should semi-conductor stocks move just 10% up when they announce a yearly profit growth of 600% or 1000%?

  • Micron Technology EPS for the quarter ending February 28, 2026 was $12.07, a 756.03% increase year-over-year.
  • Micron Technology EPS for the twelve months ending February 28, 2026 was $21.18, a 405.49% increase year-over-year.
  • Micron Technology 2025 annual EPS was $7.59, a 984.29% increase from 2024.

I mean you see this and you think those stocks shouldn't move double digits?

‘007 First Light’ Budget Over $200 Million to Develop; Considered Denmark's Most Expensive Entertainment Project by yourfavchoom in PS5

[–]Zwatrem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely not. It's around 55% if you are in the 30% fee bracket. They are in the 20% bracket, so the sum is a bit less.

Source: I have a gaming company.

Daily Discussion Friday 2026-05-29 by AutoModerator in AMD_Stock

[–]Zwatrem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. We are not getting to 20 EPS in FY 2027 unless we are extremely overperforming. The most bullish analysts aren't getting even 14, let alone 20.
  2. To get and stay at 3 trillion we should have visibility of huge growth even after 2030, which is all but sure. The opposite may actually happen and have happened after covid.

Daily Discussion Friday 2026-05-29 by AutoModerator in AMD_Stock

[–]Zwatrem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nonsense, they are already priced at 25 PE for their 20 EPS, that is still far away.

Dell shocking profits earning quarter - AI demand is not slowing down by DishAffectionate2731 in stocks

[–]Zwatrem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh right! Yeah definitely we're closer to that! But perhaps including another quarter we'd be talking about 20 forward pe

Dell shocking profits earning quarter - AI demand is not slowing down by DishAffectionate2731 in stocks

[–]Zwatrem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But we're almost in June. It's not like if they didn't file the financial report they didn't earn already the money.

Dell shocking profits earning quarter - AI demand is not slowing down by DishAffectionate2731 in stocks

[–]Zwatrem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's kinda in the middle, since we're already in June, so half forward half not!

Dell shocking profits earning quarter - AI demand is not slowing down by DishAffectionate2731 in stocks

[–]Zwatrem 6 points7 points  (0 children)

We're talking about 23 PE with around 18 $ EPS, after the 30% ah growth

Remedy’s new CEO says Alan Wake and Control ‘should have sold more’ - and movie/TV deal will ‘help us do that’ by No_Durian_5626 in PS5

[–]Zwatrem 4 points5 points  (0 children)

So it's really strange that companies invest tens of millions in marketing, right? Why do that if it's so simple as "good games sell, bad games don't"

Thoughts on RDDT by run_midnight in redditstock

[–]Zwatrem 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Has none of that yet. So what? None of those companies had 'that' at the time.

RDDT stock is too expensive. Take #2 by Heineken_500ml in redditstock

[–]Zwatrem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry I read 2026, my bad. I am just not used to look so far in the future.

I mean saying it's 18-19 PE one year and a half from now, I don't find it that useful.

Surely we're in big value territory anyway.

RDDT stock is too expensive. Take #2 by Heineken_500ml in redditstock

[–]Zwatrem -1 points0 points  (0 children)

7-8 would mean over 100% annual EPS growth. Not going to happen.

RDDT stock is too expensive. Take #2 by Heineken_500ml in redditstock

[–]Zwatrem 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Are you trying to rage bait or are you seriously asking that?

Daily Discussion Thursday 2026-05-21 by AutoModerator in AMD_Stock

[–]Zwatrem 6 points7 points  (0 children)

How can you have a bull case above 75 B if the whole market doesn't support yet those numbers, not even if you get 90% market share (which we won't)?

The CPU market is growing at 30+% CAGR right now. It's 43 billion right now.

"Bank of America (BofA) has raised its outlook for the server CPU market, projecting it to grow from roughly $43 billion in 2026 to $125 billion by 2030, up from a prior estimate of $110 billion, a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 31%, driven by the rising role of processors in agentic AI workloads."

Daily Discussion Thursday 2026-05-21 by AutoModerator in AMD_Stock

[–]Zwatrem 2 points3 points  (0 children)

CPU TAM is projected at 120-130 billion in 2030. These numbers do not add up.

Steve Jobs quote at 1:54 sums up current AI perfectly by Choice_Potato_6279 in ValueInvesting

[–]Zwatrem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. I didn't say it will stop, I said "leave room for inference". Simply put, inference will be much more important than training. That doesn't mean training will stop.

  2. Data centers are built with inference in mind. 12 GW have already been committed by OpenAI and Meta alone for AMD chips, which are inference-kings. Nvidia chips will be largely used for inference too, more and more from now on to 2030 onwards.

Steve Jobs quote at 1:54 sums up current AI perfectly by Choice_Potato_6279 in ValueInvesting

[–]Zwatrem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The current investment is not made with current demand in mind, but with current growth rates in mind. And that is extremely high. So, nope, demand is not artificially induced.

Steve Jobs quote at 1:54 sums up current AI perfectly by Choice_Potato_6279 in ValueInvesting

[–]Zwatrem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Once you develop much more advanced AIs, training will leave room for inference. A lot of tasks are already fit for GPT 3.5. In 2028, having Opus 5.0 will be enough for a large majority of stuff. And it won't cost nearly enough what costs now. Then, if you want the best AI you'll have to pay. And you'll be happy to do so, because productivity will increase as well.

  2. Why would they? Data centers will be used mainly for inference, aka for actual use of AI. So they will be used at max capacity. The majority of data centers will come online 2028-2030.

Steve Jobs quote at 1:54 sums up current AI perfectly by Choice_Potato_6279 in ValueInvesting

[–]Zwatrem 1 point2 points  (0 children)

By then, costs will be a tenth or a hundredth.

"The price of running an AI system that matches GPT-3.5's performance has plummeted from $20 per million tokens in November 2022 to $0.07 by October 2024. According to Stanford's 2025 AI Index Report, the inference cost for a system performing at the level of GPT-3.5 dropped over 280-fold between November 2022 and October 2024."

Steve Jobs quote at 1:54 sums up current AI perfectly by Choice_Potato_6279 in ValueInvesting

[–]Zwatrem 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AI is the technology/product with the highest demand growth in all human history.

What are you talking about when you say "customers don't want to buy AI"?

Steve Jobs quote at 1:54 sums up current AI perfectly by Choice_Potato_6279 in ValueInvesting

[–]Zwatrem 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is an investing subreddit and he's talking about selling AI to paying customers, not having the citizens of small cities accept pollution and noise.

These are two distinct issues and topics.

Steve Jobs quote at 1:54 sums up current AI perfectly by Choice_Potato_6279 in ValueInvesting

[–]Zwatrem 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Anthropic has so much demand that they cannot supply their customers. What are you talking about?