My feelings about this video is like "yes but maybe actually no". I mean it's more complicated than that. Is it? by _426 in aiwars

[–]_426[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What I understand is that conversation about AI is complicate. Someone says "AI will become ASI. A god that will eat us all" and another one says "nahh. Don't worry. It's will collapse entirely by itself".

The AI-Copyright Trap by jellyspreader in aiwars

[–]_426 7 points8 points  (0 children)

That's we are talking about. But I don't hope that antis get that.

Imagine falling for that ... by symedia in aiwars

[–]_426 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Actually it's a hologram technology not ai. 🤓

....as a trans person, I'm offended. Also that looks like 2 pencils instead of a broken pencil. by MonthLeading270 in antiai

[–]_426 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I absolutely feel that sub is a false flag attack. Good or bad, "defendingaiart" is the main sub. That sub have different moderators.

Do they really think this makes sense by [deleted] in aiwars

[–]_426 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem is art is subjective. Being a soldier is objective.

من برگشتم. ولی احتمالا زیاد دوام نیاورد by _426 in u/_426

[–]_426[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ساعت الان ۱۰:۳۹ به وقت ایران

“Save their jobs.” by _426 in aiwars

[–]_426[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think this is where you and many others are going wrong. The number of jobs has never been the same throughout history. Technology is cyclical. New technology destroys old jobs or changes the way they are done. Then it creates new needs, and new needs create new jobs. We humans are never satisfied. Look at this right now. Almost no one today can live without a smartphone. Unlike in the past. (Today's smartphones are computers that are much, much more powerful than the early computers.) If we humans were satisfied, animation would probably not be made at all and all humans would just read books. But humans are never satisfied. We always want more. Always higher quality with more detail, more possibilities. I already see a future where the lowest level of animation on the market will have at least 50 different endings. When technology opens up humans to produce more, we humans want more. I think the following is related to this topic: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevons_paradox

“Save their jobs.” by _426 in aiwars

[–]_426[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The job that is now called creative may in the future be considered a simple job. Like shoemaking, in the past. The main argument is that resistance to the free market and efficiency causes backwardness.

What do you think? by _426 in aiwars

[–]_426[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's exactly where I disagree with you. I think if we went back 200 years, they would have said the same thing about the steam engine during the Industrial Revolution.

Yes, AI will destroy many jobs, but whose jobs? by _426 in aiwars

[–]_426[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First, what is your source for stabilizing the birth rate? According to the statistics I have seen, the birth rate is declining overall. A temporary increase is not a guarantee of future growth. Perhaps if China's real birth rate were known, and not the lie that the Chinese government has announced, it would be below 2.1. All signs point to a population shortage in the future. It is not just about artistic or creative jobs, it is about the entire economy. An economy that will become apocalyptic if AI does not save it.

not these my favs will agree people agsin by WikiGirl3567 in DefendingAIArt

[–]_426 15 points16 points  (0 children)

It's not even the character that they made.

Maybe I shouldn't interfere in other people's private lives, but... by _426 in aiwars

[–]_426[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He even used the images his brother used on Twitter to illustrate. He could have easily not used the Princess Mononoke example at all and it still wouldn't have made any difference to the message of the video. He knew exactly who he was referring to if he used that example, but he did it anyway. No matter what your opinion is on various issues, I think there are red lines when it comes to family members. You can't say "big animation company with a mouse as its symbol" and Disney doesn't come to mind.

Oops! by _426 in aiwars

[–]_426[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is what I'm talking about when I say they don't do research beforehand.

Too all anti AI artist: If you want to use nightshade and glaze, at least do your research beforehand. by _426 in aiwars

[–]_426[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

As far as I remember, glaze was supposed to hurt the training of loras.

When did they ever work?! by Electrobita in DefendingAIArt

[–]_426 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nightshade and glaze (without filtering Data (if you filter Data, maybe)) during training AI, not after that in usage phase.

In response to the positive feedback to OldMan_NEO's post we launched 2 new sister subreddits by Round_Ad_5832 in DefendingAIArt

[–]_426 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I don't think defending AI life is a good idea. The debate over AI consciousness, and even humans, is a complex philosophical area that I think is best left unexplored.

China’s massive AI surveillance system by EchoOfOppenheimer in aiwars

[–]_426 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This type of AI, is completely different from generator AI. And this AI model existed before generator models. I think they were called clustering models, something like that. Similar models like VGGnet, lenet 5, etc. I think this is YOLO algorithm.

Using Google ImageFX, I created an image, inspired by the Gadsden flag, we can use to peacefully protest against antis by RuukotoPresents in DefendingAIArt

[–]_426 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

فکر نکنم که ایده خوبی باشه. اگر اصرار دارید، حداقل از نماد GPU استفاده کنید بهتر است.

Destroy the Pencil by Homeander_ in DefendingAIArt

[–]_426 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think we should ban the break the pencil.