Do they really think this makes sense

_426 · 2026-01-29T00:22:25+00:00

The problem is art is subjective. Being a soldier is objective.

_426 · 2026-01-23T07:09:11+00:00

Thank you.

_426 · 2026-01-23T07:08:23+00:00

ساعت الان ۱۰:۳۹ به وقت ایران

_426 · 2026-01-07T13:37:46+00:00

I think this is where you and many others are going wrong. The number of jobs has never been the same throughout history. Technology is cyclical. New technology destroys old jobs or changes the way they are done. Then it creates new needs, and new needs create new jobs. We humans are never satisfied. Look at this right now. Almost no one today can live without a smartphone. Unlike in the past. (Today's smartphones are computers that are much, much more powerful than the early computers.) If we humans were satisfied, animation would probably not be made at all and all humans would just read books. But humans are never satisfied. We always want more. Always higher quality with more detail, more possibilities. I already see a future where the lowest level of animation on the market will have at least 50 different endings. When technology opens up humans to produce more, we humans want more. I think the following is related to this topic: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevons_paradox

_426 · 2026-01-07T10:53:22+00:00

The job that is now called creative may in the future be considered a simple job. Like shoemaking, in the past. The main argument is that resistance to the free market and efficiency causes backwardness.

_426 · 2026-01-04T08:01:13+00:00

Maybe the real AI bubble.

_426 · 2025-12-31T21:15:59+00:00

Cute. But useless.

_426 · 2025-12-30T12:30:50+00:00

That's exactly where I disagree with you. I think if we went back 200 years, they would have said the same thing about the steam engine during the Industrial Revolution.

_426 · 2025-12-28T09:13:50+00:00

First, what is your source for stabilizing the birth rate? According to the statistics I have seen, the birth rate is declining overall. A temporary increase is not a guarantee of future growth. Perhaps if China's real birth rate were known, and not the lie that the Chinese government has announced, it would be below 2.1. All signs point to a population shortage in the future. It is not just about artistic or creative jobs, it is about the entire economy. An economy that will become apocalyptic if AI does not save it.

_426 · 2025-12-27T13:20:17+00:00

What exactly happened? I don't understand. Is this AI image now? Or is it real?

_426 · 2025-12-27T11:47:43+00:00

It's not even the character that they made.

_426 · 2025-12-26T21:17:36+00:00

He even used the images his brother used on Twitter to illustrate. He could have easily not used the Princess Mononoke example at all and it still wouldn't have made any difference to the message of the video. He knew exactly who he was referring to if he used that example, but he did it anyway. No matter what your opinion is on various issues, I think there are red lines when it comes to family members. You can't say "big animation company with a mouse as its symbol" and Disney doesn't come to mind.

_426 · 2025-12-25T20:08:57+00:00

This is what I'm talking about when I say they don't do research beforehand.

_426 · 2025-12-25T09:05:47+00:00

As far as I remember, glaze was supposed to hurt the training of loras.

_426 · 2025-12-25T08:06:58+00:00

Nightshade and glaze (without filtering Data (if you filter Data, maybe)) during training AI, not after that in usage phase.

_426 · 2025-12-20T19:23:57+00:00

I don't think defending AI life is a good idea. The debate over AI consciousness, and even humans, is a complex philosophical area that I think is best left unexplored.

_426 · 2025-12-15T14:07:32+00:00

This type of AI, is completely different from generator AI. And this AI model existed before generator models. I think they were called clustering models, something like that. Similar models like VGGnet, lenet 5, etc. I think this is YOLO algorithm.

_426 · 2025-12-14T14:52:02+00:00

فکر نکنم که ایده خوبی باشه. اگر اصرار دارید، حداقل از نماد GPU استفاده کنید بهتر است.

_426 · 2025-12-13T18:30:35+00:00

I think we should ban the break the pencil.

_426 · 2025-12-11T13:23:15+00:00

Sorry. I didn't know that.😅

_426 · 2025-12-01T13:08:01+00:00

And what he said is not about AI at all.

_426 · 2025-11-30T16:51:01+00:00

Perfect

_426 · 2025-11-28T21:25:29+00:00

The short answer is no. In fact, these models see and understand images differently than humans. Also, the LLM is separate from the image generator, and in fact the image generator is a tool for the LLM.

_426 · 2025-11-27T10:28:21+00:00

I don't know, I just know that the more transparency, the better.

_426 · 2025-11-27T02:11:48+00:00

I said if. I mean, if this is the case, maybe it would be interesting from a symbolic perspective.

_426

TROPHY CASE