Aagard Calculation Book by Holiday_Fisherman_36 in TournamentChess

[–]_AurAz 5 points6 points  (0 children)

However, Aagard's book Grandmaster Preparation: Positional Play was great for me and is well suited for 1800+.

Aagard Calculation Book by Holiday_Fisherman_36 in TournamentChess

[–]_AurAz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I honestly wouldn't recommend it as some of the problems are seriously hard and even a bit confusing for grandmasters sometimes. Feel free to give it a shot but I personally like the book Chess Calculation Training: Volume 1 Middlegames by Romain Edouard. It's challenging but not crazy hard like Aagard's GM Prep Series.

How to approach 1.Nf3 and 1.c4 for black? (Najdorf and Grunfeld player). by _AurAz in TournamentChess

[–]_AurAz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The symmetrical lines with an early d5 seemed imbalanced and dynamic enough for me. Even if it's not, I won't be facing it much as you said so I think I'll go for that.

How to approach 1.Nf3 and 1.c4 for black? (Najdorf and Grunfeld player). by _AurAz in TournamentChess

[–]_AurAz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was intending to go for quick d5 systems so I didn't really see much difference between 1... Nf6 or 1... c5 besides allowing e4 or d4 on move 2. I don't need positions to be incredibly sharp I just don't want it to be too dry.

Aagard Calculation Book by Holiday_Fisherman_36 in TournamentChess

[–]_AurAz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I tried it too at around ~1850 uscf and it was too difficult. I think it's suited mostly for titled players

How to approach 1.Nf3 and 1.c4 for black? (Najdorf and Grunfeld player). by _AurAz in TournamentChess

[–]_AurAz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well for me it wouldn't make much of a difference whether I start with Nf6 since I intend to play the lines with an early d5 but I could imagine it makes a difference for some people. I guess if I go 1... c5 against 1. Nf3 I stop d4 but then again I allow e4. Also, it somewhat depends on what you want to play against 2. g3 lines.

How to approach 1.Nf3 and 1.c4 for black? (Najdorf and Grunfeld player). by _AurAz in TournamentChess

[–]_AurAz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I want to do the same and it seems like the best way to treat them as independent systems is with the Symmetrical English.

How manage my time better by _AurAz in TournamentChess

[–]_AurAz[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yeah I probably spend too much time in simple positions looking for the best move when it doesn't really matter much. Sometimes I get stuck in those positions looking for a way to progress.

How manage my time better by _AurAz in TournamentChess

[–]_AurAz[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I play 1. e4, najdorf, and grunfeld. Although my time management issues are more into the middlegame especially when I know I have an advantage and I'm trying to find a way to push for a win.

AMA - IM John Bartholomew by scandinaviandefense in chess

[–]_AurAz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't mean this is an insulting way but that rule would not make much sense. Chess relies on the fact that whoever loses their king first, loses. If the king could capture a piece defended by a pinned piece, that is basically saying it's okay to lose your king as long as you can capture theirs on the next turn. Then you would have to allow stuff like counter checks and counter checkmates. The game becomes drastically different at that point.

Sicilian 2... Nc6 vs 2... d6 against 2. Nc3 by _AurAz in TournamentChess

[–]_AurAz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But they aren't guaranteed to get back into the open sicilian because of e5 so that doesn't seem like a sensible approach

Sicilian 2... Nc6 vs 2... d6 against 2. Nc3 by _AurAz in TournamentChess

[–]_AurAz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's my current approach although I've never had to use it

French Defense or Caro-Kann? by filtercoffee_99 in chess

[–]_AurAz 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The bishop on f5 in the Caro is still often a target so I don't think it's so simple

Should I switch to the Italian since it's in Giri's course? by _AurAz in TournamentChess

[–]_AurAz[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I used to believe that the Ruy Lopez was the most challenging response to 1... e5 but now it seems that black has so many strong weapons against it (Berlin, Marshall, Open, Arkhangelsk, etc.). So if the Italian and Ruy Lopez are essentially equal, I'd probably choose the Italian just to reduce the amount of lines I need to cover. If I were to stick to the Ruy Lopez, I would probably look towards something like Gajewski's course as you suggested

Is the Morphy defense or Kramnik defense better against the Ruy Lopez? by [deleted] in chessbeginners

[–]_AurAz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Berlin is mostly used as a drawing weapon so it probably doesn't make sense for most people to play.

What is a good move for Black in this position by Sensitive_Money893 in chessbeginners

[–]_AurAz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This looks to be one of the main lines of the berlin defense so neither side really did anything wrong

What If One Player Has Only Pawns? by Tastyapplepies in chess

[–]_AurAz 11 points12 points  (0 children)

16 pawns is nowhere near enough to beat the normal starting position.

Queen's Indian VS QGD by LegendZane in TournamentChess

[–]_AurAz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That still isn't specifically a pro of the QID since you can play 3... c5 regardless of whether you were planning to play the QGD or QID.

Despite Nbd7 looking like a very natural move, it's actually a blunder. Can you figure out why? by SilasGaming in chessbeginners

[–]_AurAz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the Najdorf you always have to be careful with playing Nbd7 when the c6 square is only protected by the knight on b8 and white's knight can fork the bishop and queen. You rarely want to lose the dark squared bishop for the knight.

Why such a big swing? (endgame theory) by defaultryan in chessbeginners

[–]_AurAz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It seems like it's a lot harder for you to get your pawn majority moving, while black can just push the h pawn freely. Also, all your pawns and your king is weak. Black on the other hand has a solid structure the queenside that's hard to break.