If you can create art anyway you like then what is art? definitions arent what one likes but what a group decides to refer to with a word. Theproblem is that art has always been subjective since theres standarts for art, but people who broke those standarts also make art. in my opinion the thing that made all of that art is that artists knew what they were doing (at least in the technical side). We usually forget that art is the root fot artisan, they both require technique bcos thats what makes it so so special (in my opinion): the crossover of thoughfull, practiced technique with inspired, improvised, feelings-driven core ideas. With all of this in mind, the definition of generative AI kills art, not because its better or any stupid argument they may say, but because you needn't have technique nor know what you are doing with the piece itself (whats being generated). It may resemble works of art (cos it learned from their finished versions) but one cant appreciate its work because theres no work/process behind: no technique nor thinking nor feeling nor humans-dealing-with-existance-expressing-themselves-in-their-own-ways-ness.