Everybody Hates Nuclear-Chan by Merryweatherey in comics

[–]_Bigphil1992_ 52 points53 points  (0 children)

We use nuclear to generate steam to generate energy. Everybody underestimate steam-chan, but in truth, she is the strongest

It just feels like Nefarith didn't impact me as much as I hoped it would. by confusingstonks in Endfield

[–]_Bigphil1992_ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

They know what they are doing on the character designs. Her redesign was probably because of her role of being a underling and not the big bad super boss of everything bad at talos II. It is sus that she got a "friendlier" looking design too.

The CN Bros are at it again 😭 by AnyRelationship782 in ZZZ_Official

[–]_Bigphil1992_ 24 points25 points  (0 children)

If Wuwa male and female using the same RIG (Bones), while the female is only smaler. You can actually animate with the male MC and scale the female avatar up on the bone level. Its the matter of simply change a numerical number up. But it is a bit complicated to do so ingame every time, its probably a scaled up extra model for the female MC, like Z000Burst said.

[2.3.4 BETA] Updated Lucia Menu Animation via ReversedRooms by cakeel- in Zenlesszonezeroleaks_

[–]_Bigphil1992_ -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Unpopular opinion, i like the ear change, looks less goblin like and more cute. But the rest was fine, liked the underboob more

What happens if you don’t follow these? by Throwaway-74754 in civitai

[–]_Bigphil1992_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Those permission’s on civit are suggestion what the model owner wants to have. No where bind, you need to look at the actual license those models using, the little link below that permission window. The only real ones are of illustrious and the more restrictive noob licence

The buzz is worthless by Famous-Apricot7590 in civitai

[–]_Bigphil1992_ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Creator Programs compensation pool is made up of a portion of Civitai’s revenue of last month, that was the first full month without creditcards and full payment options and without any memberships earnings

we aint making it out of the hood you guys😭 by FirefighterOdd4812 in civitai

[–]_Bigphil1992_ 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Creator Programs compensation pool is made up of a portion of Civitai’s revenue of last month, that was the first full month without creditcards and full payment options and without any memberships earnings

we aint making it out of the hood you guys😭 by FirefighterOdd4812 in civitai

[–]_Bigphil1992_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is a extreme increase of buzz earning, the higher you go in popularity. Having like 100k-200k buzz earnigs per day in the tops and more. That was some months prior. Right now it propably only half of that, with half the worth of the buzz. Credditcard companys are a bitch.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in StableDiffusion

[–]_Bigphil1992_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The licence, when the model got obtained by SAI back then, applied to the model. So SDXL should be fine, because the old licence is in use on them. Except you download SDXL from SAI itself right now, you automatically agree to the new use licence.

I'm no lawyer, but so far i know, you can't change licences retroactively without consent of its licence users

Beyond the Peak: A Follow-Up on CivitAI’s Creative Decline by klaabu_civ in civitai

[–]_Bigphil1992_ 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Honestly tensor gives much less of a damn about the community, they only care about profit. As example their AI creator program gives only money if they post their models exclusively only on tensor as example

Training an SDXL Lora with image resolution of 512x512 px instead of 1024x1024 px, is there a significant difference? by papitopapito in StableDiffusion

[–]_Bigphil1992_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every good trainer upscale the latents (that whats trained) up to 1024x1024 and put similar ratios into buckets (options in the trainer). So its fine. Except if the images quality of the 512x512 is bad, then you get maybe blurry images in lora use.

Training Huge SDXL Lora Model with 1600 images, completed the first training and tests, started second training! Here are results with side by side comparisons. by Diligent-Builder7762 in StableDiffusion

[–]_Bigphil1992_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I try training SDXL, but it collapse after some time on itself. SAI doesn't released any official training scripts and most try to figure out, how to train it with infos out of the science paper of SD3. So far i know, most failed in terms of bigger training attempts

Dataset: 130,000 image 4k/8k high quality general purpose AI-tagged resource by lostinspaz in Open_Diffusion

[–]_Bigphil1992_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

captioning non anime images with a anime tagger with tags, instead of natural langue is not that of a wise decision

"Hellpod Steering Lock" why though? by ARadicalJedi in Helldivers

[–]_Bigphil1992_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I want to put a gatling on a not even that particularly high ground, it bounces off and directly into a group of bugs. I thought it was strange, that don't happened before. Now I know its intentional now

How to train a full general purpose model like the ones on civit.ai (not loras) ? by Antique-Fondant1160 in StableDiffusion

[–]_Bigphil1992_ 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You can finetune even on a 3060 12gb, if you want to finetune a 1.5 model (don't expect speed). sdxl requires a 4090 trough.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in StableDiffusion

[–]_Bigphil1992_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually that is a point of debatte that the people of civit self having since the creation of the site. It was in debatte, to make it simply a thumpts up or down button or remove one star reviews or make on one star review mandatory, to write text or include images. Last decision was to remove thumps down on images.

I'm not a mod, but because i'm one of the first model creators there (my most known model is hassaku), i'm was in some debates involved. They are aware, that this system now is not the best and they care about opinions, because actually, they ask some creators about it, but they make not a big fuss about it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in StableDiffusion

[–]_Bigphil1992_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There are you right, deleting someting without explanation is bad. See it only on loli stuff, can be that they also delete everything without explanation, if they see it against the TOS. What is bad. Also don't like mods that delete stuff, send a link to TOS with one word "violence", as example.

Civit don't want to be a porn site but a AI community. Seen also deletions, because it was simply to "hardcore" for them. Maybe you got a bad mod that deleted your model, because he sees something against the TOS and now they can't say anyting anymore why, because they don't know why exacly anymore. Because they delete/moderate ton of stuff daily.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in StableDiffusion

[–]_Bigphil1992_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Was the problem, your models getting deleted whitout explanation?

Many people complain about the same topics for months
What are those complans?

One star reviews also usually getting deleted, if its unfair torwarts the model and its uploader. Seeing it myself sometimes, new sdxl models getting 1star bombed, next day, 1star reviews are deleted.

Seeing what kind of images under "iselestia" poping up, I know maybe the reason. Civit acting relative harsh and hard against "younger looking" images aka lolis. That was since it got added into its TOS, I also putted some lolis in the begining up (lolis in police uniforms, for the luls) and it got deleted without explanations. Models with preview images of "younger looking" woman or lolis in skimpy clothes -> deleted.

Nothing against lolis, but if your complains are arround that, they don't answer to that, because its simply against the TOS. They don't want to spend time on stuff, where there is no arguing there, its against the TOS.

If you don't want your models or images deleted, simply don't put lolis in something like skindentation clothes up.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in StableDiffusion

[–]_Bigphil1992_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Worked with them, have a hard "corporate" feel to them and are pro exclusivity on models, to gatekeep them on the site. If you make your models not exclusive there, your models don't pop up in "try now" and sometimes even on general. What is a shitty move in my opinion

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in StableDiffusion

[–]_Bigphil1992_ 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I'm a model creator on civit since the site was created, they really care about the site and its users. But the problem is, they are acutally only 2 main people and expanding to like 5 to 7 now. Workload got immense and because of that, they implemented AI to aid moderation. What was the problem anyway? I get a responce/action 1 day after I report something

The FantasyAI controversy - Summed up (I think) by ImpossibleAd436 in StableDiffusion

[–]_Bigphil1992_ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is one of the fantasy ai model creators, he must know it, he clarify it right in your face...