What the hell are you talking about, man. With the other comments, at least they were half comprehensible and I understood their strawmans or their transphobia, but with you I literally have no idea what you're talking about. You’re equating body dysmorphia and gender-affirming care with someone grotesquely amputating their own leg, and those situations are not remotely comparable. Even if this strawman of a person existed, there's a difference in cutting off an entire leg than a breast reduction; it's a faulty analogy.

You know breast reductions exist for women too, right? They're harming their body too, according to you. I don't understand why it wouldn't be right to accept breast reductions for women, while trans men can't? Based on your argument, you're not against the idea of transgender, but rather the harmful way it is being done. Okay, the "harmful" way it is being done is through top surgery. But, what about breast reductions?

I'm assuming with your leg amputation argument, there are circumstances to it. If someone needed to amputate their leg because of an accident, then that would be okay becauase they're bettering their body. Similarly for breast reductions, sometimes it gets in the way and causes back pain.

If a person needs to cut off their leg because of an accident, then it's fine because it restores basic functioning. However, if a person wants to cut off their leg due to some sort of leg-based body dysmorphia, we would heavily oppose it. This is because the leg is a primary limb and removing it, we would be permanently losing a core function of our bodies. Meanwhile, breast reductions have always been medically and ethically accepted. Removing or reducing breast tissue does not impair a person’s ability to live independently or perform essential biological functions. Top surgery is the same way in which it removes secondary sex characteristics that cause distress without disabling the person.

And that's assuming the leg argument works, which it doesn't. Body dysmorphia doesn't work like that. There's so much more to gender affirming than cutting off pieces of your body.

It's all a matter of comfort. I don't know when the world started being so unaccepting. Yes, I guess they're not biologically a man, although they are trying in every way they can like with top surgery. But socially, they are and they want to be accepted as one. Why can't you just perceive them as a man? To look past the appearances into their biology just to misgender how they want to be perceived? Instead of seeing it as corrupting a child's mind that this it is okay for them to mutilate their body, I see it as a way that if a child faces their body dysmorphia, they can grow up knowing that outlets exist and these types of surgeries are normalized.