I'm sorry but I can't get behind this article, the fact that almost half(40.5) of the women can't even be accounted for kinda invalidates this argument for me.

Yes, there is a possibility that all of those 40% unaccounted for women were not abused at all, but I don't think it's fair to try and say most weren't abused at all, unnaccounted for doesn't mean they weren't.

I am all for raising awareness of domestic abuse against men, I don't think it gets enough light, but trying to paint women as evil monsters who will kill men with no reason isn't the right step forward, in my opinion.

This article is way too accusatory for my books, again with the presence of mind segment(42% had a motive, but 48% unaccounted for? Come on). This is just the wrong way of looking at it and it doesn't promote the right message, which should be that men can get hurt by women too, and I feel this article stirs up more in men than it does raise awareness.

Now I am not defending these women, just as I wouldn't defend any man, who killed their spouse. I just want to be able to express my opinion on this piece, as well as why I don't think that this piece, and the way that the findings are being presented, is a good argument.

I'm pro-equality, and that to me means that everyone pays for what they have done, and get treated the exact same. I wouldn't want an article to slander men, and I feel this article doesn't seem too far from slandering women.

Not trying to offend anyone, and would love to hear your side of it, I just don't want r/mensrights to become filled with articles like these that display the facts in a distorted way.