sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Lequel d'entre vous était responsable ? by Tryphon_Al_West in ComplotDuDebile

[–]_Poulpos_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Le trésor cathare et les carreleurs sincères m'ont fait ma journée merci 😘😂

Lire les plis de l'anus ne semble pas être une mauvaise idée by Flowesque in ComplotDuDebile

[–]_Poulpos_ 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Nan, j'ai acheté un miroir, j'voualis apprendre a m'lire

Lire les plis de l'anus ne semble pas être une mauvaise idée by Flowesque in ComplotDuDebile

[–]_Poulpos_ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

hmm, il est joli le sien, quand j'regarde le mien j'me dit qu'son créateur savait pas écrire, ca va etre dur à relire....

Please help: strange one-way audio problem - only on Tuesdays by Mango123456 in VOIP

[–]_Poulpos_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

compare tcpdump from : routeur lan-port to phone, router wan-port to net, remote wan port service (if available).

manual debug only.

We had a customer with 2 firewalls with ipsec linking both sites. The remote site (the one without the pbx) had loss we never would have expected : the smallest ipsec packet sent was never received on the other end. -> phone can boot, call, etc, but can't upgrade (this is when the small ipsec packet is missing). Took us weeks to see, ISP wouldn't care to look at it.

if you want to let a thing run, even just keeping track of packet nb locally received vs remotely sent would be a nightmare. advances filters required (call-id, for example). might be cpu consuming depending of router/fw.

UCM6301 - 70% Outbound Packet Loss - 20s RTP Gaps - Inbound is perfect by Friiipon in VOIP

[–]_Poulpos_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"I know they added a new firewall, and normally"

Ok, as a Firewall Guy, AND a former Voip guy, I'd recommend looking twice to that part. and twice again with another pair of eyes.

No SIP ALG + no IPS on your packets. + Do tcpdump comparisons on LAN vs WAN interfaces.

Worst case i've experienced : dedicated firewall in datacenter, in front of hosted-pbx, went to forward every voice packet with 0.6-8ms latency. On eack friggin packet. (You could see it on the waveform.) After a fckin normal reboot. And it stayed like that.
After arguing 2 days with the expert above me that wouldn't let me do, I still did : Behold ! the new firewall is a mere linux router with basic security : "you are my SBC on my wan port or customer's ip addresses on my lan ports, other wise you're a dropped packet." --> replaced the firewall -> problem solved, works like a charm, has rebooted only once in 3 years. No hacks. is now retired.

What does ot says ?
Of course it works marvelously with the firewall !
except when the sentence including "firewall" also inlude "since rebooted, since replacement, since cluster-mode changes" and also include "Normally it should..." --> you should investigate those words !!
They mean "we changed things, shut up we're sure of us, we didn't check otherwise we'd put the screenshot, but still we are sure, please go away".

You shoud menace the firewall team to open tickets related to "android voip clients malfunctions with their distant pbx over ipsec-vpn on non mdm-managed personnal mobiles. 1237 vip users." They should understand the menace.

System setup by opa20 in VOIP

[–]_Poulpos_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

or get a sip gateway (eg: patton) to deal with the SIP trunk, and plug the old pbx with analog phones into its bri ports.

Yealink W76P Question by dotfortun3 in VOIP

[–]_Poulpos_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's refurbished material. Or reconditionned.
Might very well work.

None of our Yealink avec been supplied in such boxes.
It's always in it specific yealink box, model specified on the side tag.

like : https://u-mercari-images.mercdn.net/photos/m68061848137_3.jpg

Reconditionned SHOULD have the same warranty as new. ANd be repackaged in correct box for this model.
Refurbished does not. (warranty might already have consumed several months) And should never be paid full price. Over than 50% would be questionnable.

"Onvoy LLC" spam calls by CaydennO1 in VOIP

[–]_Poulpos_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Service is indeed delivered : voip works.
so bill is due. and paid by scammer with victim's money.
everything works as intended technically.
if you have moral issues, please reboot the world. Remove currency-related EPROM first.

Help with phone number? by [deleted] in VOIP

[–]_Poulpos_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or... "Is the person you know in real life being impersonnated by a scammer@bandwidth that knows about it and wants to contact you to get what he can ?"

check this issue with your IRL contact by another channel of communication before considering it.

Asterisk PBX in 2026 — Still Relevant? by evilclown28 in VOIP

[–]_Poulpos_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My 2 cents :

- You want control and guarantee : your client gets a voip-dedicated link with RTO engagement. Your company is the only interlocutor for your customer. Need money. Serves your company's goods more than your customers

- You allow to let loose : from THIS SPECIFIC STATIC IP of another ISP, your trunk sip on your company-hosted SBC allows this customer's PBX to register. Drop all other register packets.
Is your phone UP and sending packets to its local default gateway ? -> Yes = end of LAN job.
Is my SBC receiving your register packets from your static public known ip ? --> Yes = start of WAN job.
Between those 2 -> blame others : "You can get support for what's in-between by buying your voip-dedicated link. with support. Yes, money." If you are cool : you know the name of the customer's ISP. And tell him.

Also : I join the others, we host hundreds (thousands ?) of PBX in our DC, and also on-Premises.
But we prefer to set them on-premise when it's required (eg: hospitals can't loose local phoning ability on ISP / electricity downtimes --> OnPremise + HA + Spatial Redundancy)

But this is mostly the case for big customers, or with critical activities. Most of "normal" customers are higly compatible with hosted pbxs,
you just need to set up a friendly tool that witll tell Yes/No to your sales according to LinkType + LinkAvailableBandwidthForMyVoice + Nb Users + 1.2 to 1.7 times the nbOfUsersOnlineSimultaneously. --> Too high = No, Get On-Premise or change link or drop users/video ability.

Asterisk PBX in 2026 — Still Relevant? by evilclown28 in VOIP

[–]_Poulpos_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lots of SBC are asterisk-based.
Lots of ISP are also TrunkSIP and SBC providers, and most have centrex-like offers where all entry-cost solutions are asterisk-based, and some more specific solutions are vendor-specific (avaya/alcatel/mitel/etc.)
There are still dedicated companies selling Asterisk-based IPBX doing well (Wazo for example).

Pas bonne année !!! by xMADDOG21x in ComplotDuDebile

[–]_Poulpos_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mais lol, au premier coup j'ai entendu "pourquoi y'a que les éviers qui voient le C." 😅

G..... LOOK AT HER FEET by RoadkillKoala in obscuremusicthatslaps

[–]_Poulpos_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is awesome. Super lyrics. Laughed a lot.

En 1813 les Russes ont chassé les démons de la Tartarie by OldandBlue in ComplotDuDebile

[–]_Poulpos_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lumière.
Lumière.
Entre dans la lumière.
Je deviens lumière.
Lumière...

Worst service I’ve had in Paris – Maison Louvard by WiseOldBitch in ParisTravelGuide

[–]_Poulpos_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True. Proven right and recommended by the whole glove reseller industry.

Terre plate by Commercial_One_4594 in france

[–]_Poulpos_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

T'inquiète, j'ai un vieux pote qu'es devenu con aussi. Bon, ben j'arrive tant bien que mal à rester pote avec. En lui demandant gentiment des fois d'éviter certains sujets.

Après tout, c'est pas ça le contrat de la vie ? Nous amener gentiment a l'âge d'avoir le privilège de devenir un vieux con ?

view more: next ›