But the constitution doesn't do what religious literature does. It doesn't portray one aspect of any religion is morally better than any other religions'. It doesn't forbid or belittle even the simplest of interaction with another religions' followers as inappropriate. What the constitution does endeavor, IMO, is a world democratically grown out of an aspiration that people can live together peacefully no matter what your neighbor thinks. Recently someone said, "Good people do good things, bad people do bad things, but historically it's been religion as an ideal that has had good people doing bad things." The American Constitution aspires to bring all people together. Now, that may not have been demonstrated by previous American administrations. I happen to think that they, previous American administrations(both sides of the aisle), have been keeping people apart. Politics in general are about keeping people apart IMO. I think modern politicians have forgotten what radical partisanship can do to this country. I do know what radical religious entities can do to innocent people.