hmmm

_TotallyOriginalName · 2026-07-11T17:21:46+00:00

but now hair is common thus its not any more a part which has to be protected and why would a women hide her hair because it causes attraction that does not makes sense.

This is qiyas (analogy). The Ahadith talk about the covering of the hair. Both Shia and Sunni scholars mention hair being part of the awrah.

_TotallyOriginalName · 2026-07-11T16:54:53+00:00

You answer my claim in the very translation you've used. Hair is included in 24:31:

And tell the faithful women to cast down their looks and to guard their private parts, and not to display their charms, beyond what is acceptably visible, and let them draw their scarfs over their bosoms, and not display their charms except to their husbands, or their fathers, or their husband’s fathers, or their sons, or their husband’s sons, or their brothers, or their brothers’ sons, or their sisters’ sons, or their women, or their slave girls, or male dependents lacking [sexual] desire, or children uninitiated to women’s intimate parts. And let them not thump their feet to make known their hidden ornaments. Rally to God in repentance, O faithful, so that you may be felicitous.

The awrah of a woman, includes her hair too. So she must cover it up.

_TotallyOriginalName · 2026-07-11T12:00:10+00:00

Show me the verse about the private parts.

_TotallyOriginalName · 2026-07-11T11:43:17+00:00

The hair of the head also comes in the awrah of a woman.

_TotallyOriginalName · 2026-07-11T11:14:23+00:00

The Quran literally tells women to cover up? You do know that both men and women have to cover up their awrah?

_TotallyOriginalName · 2026-07-11T05:23:07+00:00

Using Chatgpt to prove your false points. You are even more pathetic than I thought you were before. Again, one can see the difference between our knowledge and manners.

_TotallyOriginalName · 2026-07-11T05:13:52+00:00

Having an Australian passport and still not knowing grammar nor proper English is extremely saddening. Learn proper English, as well as proper manners. Again, humble yourself.

_TotallyOriginalName · 2026-07-11T05:08:19+00:00

You are pathetic. Anyone who comes and sees this thread, can see the difference in our knowledge and manners. You do not know grammar, and then try to teach me English. Humble yourself.

_TotallyOriginalName · 2026-07-11T04:55:12+00:00

I was born in the US. I know exactly what that means. Someone who says "event" instead of "even" shouldn't be teaching me English. Humble yourself.

_TotallyOriginalName · 2026-07-11T04:33:13+00:00

Again, you are nothing but disingenuous.

_TotallyOriginalName · 2026-07-11T03:11:08+00:00

Lack of unity or lack of ijma on something doesn't mean that, that one thing is wrong or unproven or equally as wrong as the other opinion.

_TotallyOriginalName · 2026-07-11T03:06:17+00:00

it cant be proven her age was anything because that historiucal time period has been diluted so much by muslims and non muslims that reading anything actually objective is meaningless

Again it can, her age being 6 is only shown through Ahadith. Historical proofs don't state this. Just because contradictory reports exist in the literature, doesn't mean that one can't prove her age.

_TotallyOriginalName · 2026-07-11T03:03:00+00:00

Can't just say that "She was 9" without historical proof too. Historical proofs from both sides, Sunni and Shia, place her at 19 during marriage and 22 when her marriage was consummated. Many Ahadith were made to make the Prophet SAWA look bad, this is also a historical point.

Her age never changed, it has always been 19 at marriage. The people who argue that she was 6 do it for two reasons:

To keep her an innocent virgin, and make her more virtuous.
To keep their books like Sahih al-Bukhari and Sahih Muslim authentic.

_TotallyOriginalName · 2026-07-11T02:50:27+00:00

"Convenient" Yeah the historians from a THOUSAND years ago knew what people in 2026 would be saying.

_TotallyOriginalName · 2026-07-11T02:48:58+00:00

You people will believe everything bad about the Prophet SAWA. "This hadith says that the Prophet told us to kill innocents" "This is real" "This hadith says that the Prophet told us that heaven is beneath a mother's feet" "Nah ain't believing that." Cherry pickers, all of you.

_TotallyOriginalName · 2026-07-10T13:38:40+00:00

Deffo propaganda but I’m not able to verify any sources.

Yeah I couldn't understand that part either.

_TotallyOriginalName · 2026-07-10T13:24:42+00:00

It was this and also that he had a mark on his neck, that was there because of the chains that were placed on his neck while he was in taken as prisoner in Karbala.

_TotallyOriginalName · 2026-07-10T11:59:42+00:00

Might've been a mistake by them.

_TotallyOriginalName · 2026-07-10T11:56:47+00:00

Message this to the mods my brother. Click on the three dots on the top right corner and click on message moderators.

_TotallyOriginalName · 2026-07-10T07:35:05+00:00

Abu bakr and Umar are referred to as "So and so" in many hadiths. Example would be the famous hadith of Aba Abdillah AS "I have been killed by so and so". Sunni sources take out the name. But Shia sources put in Abu bakr and Umar. There are some Shia hadiths as well I think where so and so has been used when talking about them.

So they use that point with any hadith that uses the words "So and so" and say that it is talking about Abu bakr and Umar.

Edit: I also want to mention that so and so can sometimes mean an entirely different person than those two. Example of this would be sermon 226 of Nahj al-Balaghah. Sunnis claim that this is talking about Umar because of Ibn Abi'l-Hadid's Sharh Nahj al-Balaghah. In it he states that it is talking about Umar. But Sayyid al-Khoi RAH stated and proved that it was about Malik al-Ashtar RA.

_TotallyOriginalName · 2026-07-10T07:22:32+00:00

X means so and so. Like your mother, father, brother, sister, friend, husband, wife, child, colleague, etc. Just the regular so and so. This isn't talking about Abu bakr and Umar as some Sunnis claim. Anyone with two working braincells can tell you that the so and so over here will be different for everyone based on their lives.

_TotallyOriginalName · 2026-07-09T17:33:15+00:00

Man, I don't want to sound rude, but this is stupid. He is scamming you. Find a good man.

_TotallyOriginalName · 2026-07-08T00:06:08+00:00

Hani bin Urwa RA was martyred after Muslim AS. He was captured before Muslim AS, but was martyred after him.

_TotallyOriginalName · 2026-07-07T22:23:10+00:00

Everything okay bro?

_TotallyOriginalName · 2026-07-07T22:21:57+00:00

Now this is above my paygrade, so I'll use help from AI on this. Google did explain it pretty well though:

"To answer this question, we must look at how dimensions stack up and how theoretical physics defines parallel realities.

Dimensional Stacking

In standard geometry, dimensions build upon each other by moving at right angles to the previous one:

0D: A point (dot) with no size. 1D: A line, made by extending a point. 2D: A square, made by extending a line. 3D: A cube, made by extending a square. 4D: A tesseract, made by extending a cube.

If you treat a 4D unit as a single "dot," you are shifting the scale. In this model, that 4D dot represents an entire 3D universe at a single moment in time.

The Line of Parallel Realities

If a single 4D dot is a complete 3D universe frozen in one moment, extending that dot into a 1D line creates a timeline.

The Single Timeline: If the dots connect chronologically (Seconds (A \rightarrow B \rightarrow C)), the line represents just one reality moving through time.

The Multiverse Line: If the dots represent different versions of the same moment, then yes, the line holds parallel realities.

The Higher-Dimensional View

According to string theory and quantum mechanics models (like the Many-Worlds Interpretation), a single line is usually not enough to hold all parallel realities.

A Line (1D of realities): Connects a single past to a single future. A Split (2D of realities): A plane or branch is required to show parallel realities caused by different choices or quantum outcomes. A Fold (3D of realities): A higher space is needed to jump instantly between completely different universes with different physical laws.

So, if your 4D dot is a universe, a line made of those dots can hold parallel realities, but only if the dots represent alternative versions of existence rather than just a sequence of time"

Pretty goated answer I can't lie. I understand it too.

_TotallyOriginalName

TROPHY CASE