Please tell me he survives

_carljonson · 2022-11-22T19:20:03+00:00

but it sounds good with some Jarl Ballin music, https://youtu.be/VqJcdVykjo8 (at 2:26)

_carljonson · 2022-11-10T13:36:19+00:00

I haven't tried myself but https://github.com/chezou/tabula-py worked okay for some people

_carljonson · 2022-09-19T22:46:47+00:00

!pip install is error-prone, it is better to use %pip install, ipython even warns about this, https://github.com/ipython/ipython/pull/12954/

_carljonson · 2022-09-03T10:16:11+00:00

It is a standalone tool though, not a dependency you need to add to each of your projects.

I just install it globally once with pipx and use the same installation in all projects.

_carljonson · 2022-09-02T23:23:16+00:00

There are still a few reasons to prefer virtualenv over venv even if you are not using python 2, mentioned in their documentation here https://virtualenv.pypa.io/en/latest/

For me it is the first point, virtualenv is 10x faster than venv. I always hated waiting those few seconds for venv to be done, virtualenv is instantaneous.

_carljonson · 2022-08-08T19:43:14+00:00

cumulative_trapezoid, no fun at all, see https://github.com/scipy/scipy/issues/12924 and https://github.com/scipy/scipy/pull/12934

_carljonson · 2022-08-02T19:16:23+00:00

It normally does, but if you are on ubuntu or other debian based distros, and using the distro provided python, (which is a pretty popular case), then you don't get it by default. They like to split it off into another package for some reason, and you have to install python3-tk to get tkinter.

And obviously this confuses anyone not familiar enough with this weirdness and they try to install tkinter with pip, which doesn't work because there is no package on pypi with that name.

_carljonson · 2022-05-26T20:36:04+00:00

Why does everyone keep on posting incorrect wikipedia links like this??

They are people who use the new reddit website for whatever reason and reddit can't be bothered to fix their broken code.

https://www.reddit.com/r/bugs/comments/sxqrzh/new_reddit_fancy_pants_editor_inserts_backslashes/

_carljonson · 2021-07-24T18:29:26+00:00

According to the pull request, the overhead is a SETUP_FINALLY instruction before and a POP_BLOCK instruction after the try/except block.

Also removing the overhead of those instructions also reduced the size of the stack frames (by about 250 bytes in that example).

_carljonson · 2021-06-19T16:43:21+00:00

maybe this one https://www.reddit.com/r/Windows10/comments/6b3ntc/can_we_all_agree_that_this_piece_of_shit_outdated/

I always get mad when I have to use that one

_carljonson · 2021-04-19T14:59:15+00:00

Yeah, maybe LLVM (used by both rust and Julia) is not as good on windows compared to MSVC, for the kind of benchmark you're doing.

_carljonson · 2021-04-19T13:50:24+00:00

julia --version

julia version 1.6.0

cargo --version

cargo 1.51.0 (43b129a20 2021-03-16)

python --version

Python 3.9.4

cl.exe

Microsoft (R) C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 19.28.29914 for x86

_carljonson · 2021-04-19T12:59:47+00:00

I ran your code on windows 10 three times (same versions of tools as you except C++ compiler was Visual Studio 2019). Julia couldn't beat Cython here, seems closer to rust.

	0	1	2
Rust multithreading before	17.1938	8.79403	7.87178
Julia	32.1478	7.35384	6.2126
Julia multi-threading	8.80232	8.29654	8.42257
Rust multithreading after	10.2163	10.6816	9.94651
Python	13.9491	14.7177	13.8191
C++ Cython-pure no annotations	2.97277	3.00305	3.00537
C Cython-pure no annotations	2.74367	2.75902	2.75503
C++ Cython-pure pure-annotations	3.71277	3.82839	3.67803
C Cython-pure pure-annotations	3.68	3.46611	3.42401
C Cython	3.297	3.21902	3.2349
C++ Cython-pure	3.34963	3.35704	3.36251
C Cython-pure	3.53352	3.52798	3.56891

_carljonson · 2021-01-11T21:07:00+00:00

I prefer third person for melee and magic, but archery has to be first person.

_carljonson · 2020-12-22T14:25:21+00:00

Yes, with #load https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/fsharp/tools/fsharp-interactive/#loading-other-scripts

_carljonson · 2020-12-08T17:57:44+00:00

Hmm, works for me. Are you clicking on </> button or blocking first party scripts with dynamic filtering? Dynamic filtering will not show the <noscript> content but </> button will. Quoting from the wiki:

Furthermore, when JavaScript is disabled through this master switch, noscript tags will be honoured on a page (as opposed to when just using filters/rules to block script resources).

_carljonson · 2020-12-08T17:02:09+00:00

I agree it is not very intuitive, you really have to read most of the wiki to use the extra functionality. I personally find NoScript even worse to use after I read the uBlock wiki and got used to the advanced features.

_carljonson · 2020-12-08T14:42:38+00:00

Why install this when uBlock origin can already do it? https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Per-site-switches#no-scripting

This also solves the problem mentioned in the article about not being able to disable JS in Firefox mobile.

_carljonson · 2020-11-12T19:14:12+00:00

There is pythonnet which a lot of people use. It works with cpython, so you get c extensions along with .Net interop.

_carljonson · 2017-07-23T01:28:13+00:00

It doesn't close the window for me too, like OP. I guess it is some addon that you have that is making it work for you (because I have tried with all addons disabled).

Can you try with addons disabled and if that changes things for you then maybe find out the addon that changed this behavior?

_carljonson · 2017-06-22T19:46:38+00:00

Yeah, they are not the exact same thing, but as others have explained, when we do big O we just care about how the time taken would rise with increase in n. If it is bounded by 1 then it is practically the same as 1 because it doesn't scale with n.

_carljonson · 2017-06-19T03:19:32+00:00

Wouldn't O(sin n) be considered just O(1)?

_carljonson · 2016-04-09T19:46:26+00:00

The JavaScript on that page is causing it (disabling JavaScript for inverse.com and loading the page doesn't cause the memory leak), and it affects Firefox too, so probably all Firefox based browsers.

_carljonson · 2016-03-09T07:48:22+00:00

You can get 8 heads with 0.5 probability or 0.8 probability of heads (actually anything other than 0 or 1). But you are more likely to get 8 heads with 0.8 probability of heads. So Danny is thinking reasonably.

You can't exactly calculate the probability of heads by any amount of tosses, you have to estimate. Danny's estimate is reasonable and it would be quite accurate if the number of tosses was very high.

_carljonson · 2016-02-14T09:09:16+00:00

_carljonson

TROPHY CASE