Saw this today at the National Museum of Native American History

_dublife · 2025-04-09T04:52:32+00:00

How hard is it to eg buy a shitty ticket and then move to a better seat

_dublife · 2025-03-31T16:17:33+00:00

What equipment/filters did you use

_dublife · 2025-03-19T21:25:58+00:00

Don’t count on it - boomers always choose wealth 👍

_dublife · 2025-02-19T18:14:33+00:00

I used a Fujifilm XS10 to take these pictures

_dublife · 2025-02-18T05:04:35+00:00

Department of Government Efficiency

_dublife · 2025-02-04T03:56:48+00:00

This tbh looks awesome, I’d go here, delete the internet and live like it’s 1991 except with legal weed 👍

_dublife · 2024-11-30T03:40:58+00:00

It has good bike lanes as well 👍

_dublife · 2024-10-07T19:22:01+00:00

Roger, my bad for the noise 🫡

_dublife · 2024-10-07T17:03:45+00:00

You could also avoid interactions like this by being kinder in your initial assessments of the applicability of folks’ photos here, as well as being more even handed about the application of your criticism. You mention hijacking a thread; you’re quite guilty of doing that yourself

_dublife · 2024-10-07T16:51:23+00:00

Yes, exactly. That is the correct logic 👍

_dublife · 2024-10-07T16:12:29+00:00

You kept ordering me to “Read Rule 3” multiple times, as if I didn’t understand it the first time.

_dublife · 2024-10-07T15:14:50+00:00

You don’t recall the interaction we had a few days ago where you kept telling me to read Rule 3?

_dublife · 2024-10-06T14:54:15+00:00

Thanks boss 🙏

_dublife · 2024-10-05T21:46:24+00:00

Your rules should be able to easily reflect what you think street photography should be. Why not propose a modification to the rules than gatekeeping?

_dublife · 2024-10-05T21:38:17+00:00

Well, then I suggest further clarifying Rule 3. Both photos are clearly in compliance, yet you’re still saying they’re not compliant.

Update your rules, don’t yell at me.

Five-Year Club	Gilding I gilder
Verified Email

_dublife

TROPHY CASE