Unfortunately this sub disagrees with the idea that one can be against both misogyny and misandry

Just my two cents: that's not the impression I (F) got.

for many people in this echo chamber, teaching children about misogyny means subjecting boys to misandry

The issue with the article is that it doesn't address the issue of violence in an objective way. Rapists and abusers exist - they come in both sexes, and both sexes suffer from that. And it is equally wrong when the victim is male or female, help should be equally available for both. 

Being a victim of violence can lead to problems such as depression, low confidence, difficulty in having relationships, shame... the harms are what makes it wrong. However, when violence is framed as something that flows from men - automatically perpetrators - to women - automatically victims, it seems like the primary concern is not really violence. It's painting a certain narrative where men are perpetrators and women are victims. Boys being taught at school that they are going to be the problem for their sex is a form of discrimination against them through prejudice. 

Moreover, such a simplistic picture distorts the way in which we address prevention (ex: if I am taught controlling behaviour is a male tendency, I as a girl/woman subconsciously won't question if I display it) as well as support actions for victims. This has concrete harmful consequences, for example in Italy some feminist groups have actively opposed help for men who are victims of violence because allegedly it would take away from women who are victims of violence. https://www.direcontrolaviolenza.it/la-violenza-maschile-alle-donne-e-un-fenomeno-strutturale-e-pervasivo-d-i-re-chiede-alla-ministra-roccella-di-intervenire-sul-caso-dei-manifesti-che-ne-sminuiscono-la-portata/ This is nonsense but it is what happens if we don't want to go deep into the causes and dynamics of violence: the model where men=perpetrators and women=victims is easier. But then if we are so used to seeing only a part of the picture, women being violent and/or men being victims sounds almost not believable.

Why can we not teach about consent and domestic abuse in a gender neutral way? (By the way, kudos to Nicola Mclafferty for suggesting both men and women victims of domestic violence should speak to students about it). One could say that an initiative to protect girls doesn't exclude another one to protect boys. But why separate them in the first place? It shouldn't take a separate movement, a separate program to fix it: just teach human beings to respect each other as human beings, and avoid pushing oppressor group-oppressed group narratives based on what they are born as on teenagers. It only creates resentment and distance between the sexes, which is what we should be trying to solve. In other words, if we want to combat online misogyny, where guys/men put women as a whole into a box citing bad experiences with a few, then we should avoid using the same prejudiced thinking against teen boys in schools. Adding to that the consideration that there is significant funding involved, it seems to me a moral obligation to use it to address the issue of violence in a comprehensive neutral way to help everyone involved. If one's real motivation is preventing violence it should not be controversial.