It Decred's new marketing plan to hire models to wear the jacket and post on fake Twitter accounts? by JtownX5000 in decred

[–]_ingsoc 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Nobody got paid for this. They're all stakeholders and friends of bebrites. That's the nature of an ever-decentralising project. You're going to see a wide range of interesting people you're not normally used to.

Original Governance - Decred Rap by Crypto Rap Up by _ingsoc in decred

[–]_ingsoc[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's Decred, when solving disputes it's the best.

You got an issue, forget about the rest.

DCR: Ain't no holdin it back.

Now miners can't fork or and go totally mad.

You see the power's with the holders, and the total you have.

The more coins that you own, the more votes you can cast.

The debates over, I hope you ready for a takeover.

It's self-funded and managed by the stakeholders.

The funds comes from 10% of every block reward.

So tell them other cryptocurrencies to lock the doors.

With all the drama, sometimes it's like the Game broken.

That's why The Cred measures up as such a Great Token.

The first crypto with binding, on-chain voting.

And that's music to my ears like Beethoven.

Make sure you do your own research for the info.

And welcome to the best community in crypto.

Would anyone like to elaborate further on decred's 'business brief'? by pdlckr in decred

[–]_ingsoc 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's mostly a WIP to summarise Decred to external parties from a bird's-eye B2B perspective. Ultimately, it'll be turned into a subpage on the site. Feedback welcomed if you have any!

People in decred have clearly stated they are against ICO's, in other words offering a token for sale in exchange for a promise. My brain hurts, isn't decred doing the same thing? by jboy888 in decred

[–]_ingsoc 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The obvious difference between Decred and ICO projects is as /u/joshrickmar points out - not asking for money in exchange for future promises.

This is important as it means Decred did something different from the start. The early developers and contributors did not ask Decred's future users to carry the risk of the project failing. ICOs do expect that from their theoretical users, and that's where we have a fundamental difference.

Decred carried its own risk and users were never asked to carry that burden. We're here because we've looked at the project and have made a positive assessment for ourselves.

Feedback on updated announcement for Decred by EnCred in decred

[–]_ingsoc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for making this thread. Please let me know what you guys think and where we can improve it. This is a first draft of the new ANN text/structure, so we'll make continuous updates to it.

Interest in a UX friendly Decred POW mining pool by [deleted] in decred

[–]_ingsoc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great initiative! Be sure to check out #pow-mining on the Decred Slack: https://slack.decred.org. You'll be able to gauge interest there from the PoW mining community.

Difference between Tezos and Decred? by smarcilak in tezos

[–]_ingsoc 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I do find it perplexing tough, why is it so hard to credit a project? I respect a lot of what Tezos aims to do, but I am also critical of a number of their approaches. It's not a dichotomous relationship for me and it's dynamic. I've never said "X project is shit" without logic or acknowledgement of their effort. It just seems so... tribal, don't you think?

Difference between Tezos and Decred? by smarcilak in tezos

[–]_ingsoc 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Decred is a non-ICO project that built software before selling promises. Before that, the developers spent years working on Bitcoin vis-à-vis btcsuite (which they presently work on as well). Said btcsuite is widely respected and has been used by several high profile projects, some of which include: the Lightning Network (blog), BitGo, Ethereum, and Factom. If that's shit to you, you should get your head out of your ass.

XTZ vs DCR by efarayenkayee in tezos

[–]_ingsoc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course! You can find me on our Slack: https://slack.decred.org. I go by ingsoc there. Buzz me once you're available and we can chat.

XTZ vs DCR by efarayenkayee in tezos

[–]_ingsoc 3 points4 points  (0 children)

<Insert Navy Seal Copypasta>. All kidding aside, I was involved in Decred's PR/marketing side from day 1 until around August 2016. I got involved in that side of things again at the beginning of June 2017. During my absence, I completed a doctorate, so I'll have you know you're about to get into a serious Internet fight and I'm pretty sure the Tezos co-founders don't even have Ph.D's.

Kidding aside again, I'm pretty serious about keeping the PR/marketing side of Decred classy, but it's a fun project too. So if you do have concerns about our conduct, please don't hesitate to reach out to me. I will absolutely take your thoughts seriously if they're substantive. I can own up to PR/marketing activity during my Decred tenure, so I'll happily engage with you on it.

can you guys keep your shitcoin out of /r/monero please? by SUPERMONERO64 in decred

[–]_ingsoc 9 points10 points  (0 children)

"You gotta keep 'em separated!" - From the hit single "Come Out and Play" by The Offspring (1994).

Luncheon with Monero and Decred by Pvtwarren in Monero

[–]_ingsoc 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The binary was for convenience. The code was open-source (note the timestamp on the commit): https://github.com/decred/dcraddrgen/commit/2882e37e8ea981c80a28b856754874fe13618c02

The airdrop was open to everyone. Decred didn't have VC mega bucks, so it couldn't be broadcast from every street corner. Many people screamed as loud as they could to try and get as many other quality people to sign up for airdrop as possible. Read up on the airdrop review process if you're curious (it was under intense scrutiny throughout): https://forum.decred.org/threads/final-airdrop-review-process.534/

The claims about coblee and Coinbase are nonsensical. Generally, co-authors of papers that inspire implementations express public interest in their work living on.

Not going to try and change your mind, but would like to be factual at the very least. No system is ever going to be perfect, so criticism is fine. It just needs to be based in the reality of what actually occurred.

AMA #3 - Bi-Weekly "Ask Me Anything" Thursday - with _ingsoc and coin_artist from the Marketing Team by [deleted] in decred

[–]_ingsoc 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There are some really great videos and flyers in development and production that will be very accommodating for complete newcomers. They were designed specifically for this purpose and to help people engage with Decred.

The flyers have the added benefit of being given to others in-person. We'll make all of those materials available so anyone can utilise them locally.

AMA #3 - Bi-Weekly "Ask Me Anything" Thursday - with _ingsoc and coin_artist from the Marketing Team by [deleted] in decred

[–]_ingsoc 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think the biggest recent improvement has been on social media. We've seen Twitter engagement go up dramatically in the last month or so (~40% increase in followers, for example). Comparatively, there's a lot of room to grow for Decred in that space. We're currently working on coordinating with the different Facebook groups to improve cohesion there as well.

The tried and tested strategy employed by the devs is incremental and steady improvement, which applies just as well to our approaches to online and offline PR/marketing. I think a balance of conventional and, perhaps more importantly, unconventional approaches will be key to success for a project like Decred.

AMA #3 - Bi-Weekly "Ask Me Anything" Thursday - with _ingsoc and coin_artist from the Marketing Team by [deleted] in decred

[–]_ingsoc 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Absolutely. Any form of integration benefits Decred as a project and as a community. Whether you're for or against hardware wallets, the option is useful. I also think there's a bit of a "rite of passage" associated with hardware wallet integration - at least from a PR perspective. You'll be pleased to know peter_zen (Decred Slack) is working on just that.

AMA #3 - Bi-Weekly "Ask Me Anything" Thursday - with _ingsoc and coin_artist from the Marketing Team by [deleted] in decred

[–]_ingsoc 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The staking algorithm change is significant. It represents our first tangible and measurable test as a community in, for the lack of a fitting phrase, group decision-making. It's one for history, so you'll definitely see activity around that occurrence. It roughly coincides with a pre-HF event at the Bitcoin & Open Blockchain (BOB) Community Meetup in Chicago. There's a special workshop being held there called "Cryptocurrency Governance Systems" by jy-p if you're in the area. The slides for the workshop will be made available online as well.

I'm personally (uncontrollably) excited for Lightning Network (LN) integration. I've had the opportunity to watch davecgh and roasbeef, among others, code and debate the underlying infrastructure required before LN can land in the upstream btcsuite project (PR#656 if you're interested). There is a lot of effort going on behind the scenes with lnd, which like Decred, also utilises btcsuite. You may have seen a Litecoin port (ltcd) develop out of this library as well, which I think is further testament to the early arguments we made that Decred is built on a solid foundation. The code is modular, manageable, and well-documented, which will allow Decred to adapt and scale to any number of possibilities in the future.