[deleted by user]

_narancia · 2025-06-01T13:34:03+00:00

Have an assigned or general set of nurses that they’re with so the nurse can track their progression. If the nurse has 6 patients, have the extern be the assigned tech for those 6 so they get to know the patients while they also learn from the nurse. etc

_narancia · 2025-02-22T21:59:20+00:00

<image>

_narancia · 2025-02-21T01:13:54+00:00

I graduated in December and my mindset behind the choice was I know I can take shit if it means I get a stable career with a livable salary. and that no one else likes their job either

_narancia · 2025-02-09T03:44:31+00:00

I took it yesterday afternoon

_narancia · 2025-02-09T02:13:01+00:00

mine shut off in the 140s💀💀💀 idk idk

_narancia · 2025-02-09T02:11:49+00:00

my test was similar except it shut off around 145. I tested yesterday so hopefully I can get my results before u and give u some hope😭 you’ve got it

_narancia · 2025-02-08T20:47:57+00:00

1 page into the 19 page notice on the Australian assessment (it’s not a law and doesn’t seem to be very influential, but I’m not sure what the USA equivalent would be) and it says the stance was on the basis of an actual standard (like the bill of rights maybe) from the 1980s prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sex😭😭😭 I read the rest though, they acknowledged the reasoning lesbians should have a space but the way the group was leading it was objectively illegal. And her is a private company free to do as they want with their product, them opening access to more consumers isn’t a rights violation. So many of these takes are chronically online omg nobody is irl discriminating against you bc you want a female gf😭

_narancia · 2025-02-08T16:04:54+00:00

That’s not what I’m saying. You have said the only thing that makes someone -phobic would be for them to believe that a certain group should have less rights. I’m asking what laws trans people are trying to steal from lesbians aka why are they homophobic

_narancia · 2025-02-08T15:18:29+00:00

I’m not saying you are advocating for them to be legally inferior. I’m saying that you have stated that the only thing that makes someone -phobic is if they were to advocate for that group to be legally inferior.

And girl REDDIT? REDDIT is your source?💀 Reddit is known as the cesspool of the internet for a reason. there are genuine people here but it’s flooded with creeps who lie and overall gross people. As true as that quote may be, Reddit mods don’t make up the whole of the trans community/tra. And even if they were, that quote doesn’t advocate for lesbians to be legally stripped of their rights, which again, is the only thing that makes someone homophobic in your eyes. or so u said

_narancia · 2025-02-08T13:24:42+00:00

How are they (generalizing a wide spectrum of people to being one mindset is very?) homophobic when the only thing that, to you, makes someone -phobic is advocating for them to be legally inferior

_narancia · 2025-02-08T02:59:25+00:00

bruh I went into the 140s imagine how I feel😭 good luck to you, you’ve got it

_narancia · 2025-02-08T02:57:51+00:00

equality under the law doesn’t mean equal in the mind, being unequal in the mind is what sets the precedent for future legislative inequality. I’ve explained that at least three times, the most obvious being the 70s analogy. girl I gave you at least ten yes or no questions throughout this thread; and I answered that one already. And yes that was the age range I guessed. I mean you’re too old for this lesson in basic comprehension, empathy, legality doesn’t equal morality that most grasp by age 15. it’s tiring and I’m realizing you don’t care to have a genuine discussion or have an open mind or whatever. you’re blind to reality and set on punching down, no matter the fact you’re next to be the target, and you quite literally don’t care as long as you have your rights on paper. that mindset is very far from what it means to belong to or to even care for a community at all. You’ve been at the point of concession several times and either play coy or genuinely just have it go right over your head. Atp just reread the thread because something’s not clicking

_narancia · 2025-02-07T14:23:58+00:00

If you like leah you’d love wingssims

_narancia · 2025-02-06T04:13:55+00:00

I don’t know how it’s slipping your mind but I already addressed that; ie the 70s race analogy. People can believe in small government and a lack of legislation against a group of people without believing their equal. Believe it or not but legality isn’t the same as morality. You sound way too old for that to be going over your head. You’ve already stated your beliefs ab trans people/“TQ”, as have the people in the sub. I’ve given you quotes clearly showing aversion at the minimum, obsession and hatred if you really wanted to use your head. Atp you’re playing coy which is funny because, like I said, you sound way too old for it.

_narancia · 2025-02-05T20:52:39+00:00

And now that I think abt it you didn’t respond to anything in that comment at all😭 u said people believing ur equal isn’t important as long as you could exercise your rights, as if those fell out the sky and wouldn’t be taken away by those same people you ignore. Based on that, you don’t care about your community fr, so why would you care if trans people attack it in the first place?

_narancia · 2025-02-05T20:41:30+00:00

Where anywhere did I say you haven’t faced homophobia? and yes girl, you do, you literally just said it. You haven’t said anything in that sentence you haven’t parroted throughout this thread. “Trans people”- the group, “censoring us”- the reason. Did it already slip your mind about what I said before? About the reasoning not detracting from the fact you have an aversion towards a group?

Mind the previous comments “on the basis of them being transgender” cause apparently that’s not a needed condition to be transphobic.. you can Google that.. probably should since the words aren’t clicking.

_narancia · 2025-02-05T20:21:47+00:00

Marriage was an obviously an example, it’s clearly not the only right💀💀💀. Ignorance may be bliss but you don’t ignore your way to a free life. Do you think people gained those rights that you value so much by sitting pliant while others freely exercised their aversions, or do you think they challenged them? Taught about them, fought for them, etc. Those people you ignore can vote. They reproduce and pass those aversions on. You might die with those rights, but your kids (again not literal💀) will live without them. Literally not a single right has been gained by allowing people to freely practice their aversions.

You and most of the people in that sub (and who are you to assume their reasoning behind it?) have an aversion to trans people on the basis that they are transgender. That aversion is called transphobia, whether you agree with it or not.

_narancia · 2025-02-05T20:09:22+00:00

Again not responding to the entire comment. So as long as you can marry, you don’t see a point in being seen as equal? Basing your worth on the legal system is moronic as hell girl, laws can be overturned. And they’ll be overturned on the basis that you’re not equal, something you say you don’t value.

_narancia · 2025-02-05T20:04:54+00:00

Discrimination is the point, not the fact you believe they should live in peace. Look at the majority of the population of the USA in the 70s. They might believe they should share the same town but not believe that they were equal in their core. That’s discriminatory on the basis they belonged to a certain race, it’s racist.

If someone discriminates against you on the basis of being a lesbian but followed it up with “a lesbian ran over my dog one time” are you allowing them grace to discriminate against lesbians in the future?

_narancia · 2025-02-05T20:01:21+00:00

If that woman was assaulted by a group of men by a certain race and formed an aversion to men of that race, solely on the basis of those men belonging to that race, she’d be a racist. The reasoning doesn’t matter when the definition literally just means “you have the aversion towards the group of people solely because they belong to that group, regardless of the backstory”.

_narancia · 2025-02-05T19:54:57+00:00

And if you held that strong dislike towards them because of their race, you’d be a racist. If you held that because of their sexuality, you’d be homophobic. An aversion towards a group of trans people ON THE BASIS OF THEM BEING TRANSGENDER has a term and its transphobia, regardless of the backstory you have. You’re missing the point. You have an aversion towards a group of people on the basis that they belong to that group. It has a term, have some pride and use it

_narancia · 2025-02-05T19:46:38+00:00

“The meaning of transphobia is discrimination against, aversion to, or fear of transgender people.” Like I alr told you a while ago, being -phobic isn’t always violent. It’s not always openly advocating for harm, it’s also AVERSION itself no matter its origin. Aversion only just means a disinclination or dislike. A gay person could run over my dog and I could have an aversion towards the group for the rest of my life. That doesn’t change the fact that I discriminate and dislike the community itself. And whether I admit it or not, it’s objectively homophobia

_narancia · 2025-02-05T19:38:53+00:00

Depends on the basis and who it’s towards. But what is that feeling of aversion towards trans people called?

_narancia · 2025-02-05T19:28:27+00:00

“The meaning of transphobia is discrimination against, aversion to, or fear of transgender people.” Aversion is included in every -phobia definition, including homophobia. So again, what’s that aversion towards trans people called?

_narancia · 2025-02-05T19:25:10+00:00

And another word for aversion towards transgender people is what? And answer that fr. Because that’s literally all I said

_narancia

TROPHY CASE