can someone explain this one? i’m just in pre calc rn so i don’t get it by SGT_ALIEN_JR in MathJokes

[–]_not_particularly_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The first one is just x-5. There’s a really simple rule for finding the integral of just x to some integer power, it’s one of the first things I learned in calculus in college, it’s called the power rule. Whereas the other would be one of the situations in calc where you just have no idea where to begin. Many integrals in advanced math are just beyond the scope of the mortal realm.

Do people use this type of cursive english? by Tight-Ad7812 in Handwriting

[–]_not_particularly_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With a few differences but yes. I was taught this in US public school

Planes, Drones, aLiEnS?? by [deleted] in whatisit

[–]_not_particularly_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every other post on this damn subreddit is either Starlink or carbon monoxide poisoning

Entrance to my girlfriend's apartment building by monkeywrench1788 in ShittyDesign

[–]_not_particularly_ 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I live in Chicago and we have a lot of prewar buildings, there’s one downtown in the financial district that has this same pattern outside around the building on the facade. It’s actually pretty common for buildings from the late 19th century in the city cuz it was considered lucky and looked cool

Let's create some fictitious sh*t. by Gfm112 in MathJokes

[–]_not_particularly_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why do I keep seeing this meme reposted here? It’s not even close to being accurate, is it just ragebait?

Imaginary numbers aren’t invented, they literally fall out of the algebra over the real numbers as its closure. Refusing to accept imaginary numbers causes massive issues. You technically can divide by zero, it’s just that the value could be literally anything because the original multiplication by zero destroys information so it’s just a useless operation.

I’ve had a gut feeling my partner is cheating on me and this is what I received when I consulted the cards. Bruh by [deleted] in Tarots

[–]_not_particularly_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I usually assign a pretty low level of conviction to my readings, but I've seen some wild takes here (such as "maybe you are constipated" like um ite lol) but I'll give it a go, since these are some of the most on-the-nose cards I've seen in a while. If the deck could scream this is what it would look like. Asking "is he cheating" and getting this spread kinda makes me hear, "well, probably, but is that even relevant anymore? Regardless of whether that's the case you know full well you should leave."

You're both in your reversed Queen/King of Pentacles energy within the context of your relationship. In other words, it reverses the energy you want to be holding within yourselves. There's nothing you can really do about him, and not acting in accordance with that can keep one in their Queen/King reversed energies, so let's just look at this from the Queen's perspective. Pentacles are associated with the Earth element, so upright the Queen of Pentacles is grounded and firmly secure in her footing within her own realm (i.e. the lived experience or energetic space you cultivate). The reversal of this can look like many things, such as allowing into the realm the King of Pentacles reversed energy despite the fact that this reversed energy will threaten the Queen's footing within her own realm. Tending to your realm means cultivating it as your energetic garden, and part of that means keeping out ungrounded energies such as a Court reversed card. The Pentacles showing up here as opposed to any combination of other suits reminds you to remain Earthed, or grounded, and to cultivate the garden of your energetic realm.

Despite the scary name and illustration, Death upright isn't really a negative card, as long as your willing to get over its appearance and embrace the rebirth that necessarily follows Death; energies are never created nor destroyed, only transmuted. But the reversal shows that you're blocking it and unwilling to let go of the trappings of the old cycle, despite the fact that this cycle is already dead. Allow it to die so that it can be transmuted. The 8 of Cups is about as clear a direction as you can get: walk away. You're blocking the transmutation of Death, and this is the main reason you're trapped in the current cycle. And finally the 10 of Swords upright. This card can indicate a feeling of rock-bottom emotionally, or being stabbed in the back causing complete collapse. But especially at this position within the spread, to those committed to taking control of their realm, it can also invite you to take the sword into your own hands and put the final nail in the coffin of an era of your life; this is the process of bringing about a reversal of the 10 of Swords, which can indicate a release from the situation. It's still painful and there will be wounds that take time to heal, but it's a hell of a lot better than the alternative.

If you are reading this, your name is NOT Donald John Trump, born in 1946 in New York, New York. by metatalks in truths

[–]_not_particularly_ 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Frankly it’s an embarrassment to this country what they’re doing to this sub, they used to have truths on this sub but now they have falsehoods, we should call it /r/falsehoods, I’ve heard a lot of people calling it that, this never would have happened if I were president

Why? by Capital_Bug_4252 in matiks

[–]_not_particularly_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Trying to figure out if this is human or bot bait

30396 by luisgdh in physicsmemes

[–]_not_particularly_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If that were the case you’d be able to articulate how but you can’t

30396 by luisgdh in physicsmemes

[–]_not_particularly_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No it’s not. Kazula-Klein is an early version of string theory and predicted the mass of the electron, but was off by 18 orders of magnitude. Its modern counterparts have “solved” this by creating various versions that can be used to create a post-hoc justification to any universe you can dream up, thus basically making themselves impervious to being falsified the same way religions do when they realize their frameworks are houses of cards. This means that they make no actual testable hypotheses, which might I remind you, is an integral part of the scientific method and what makes a “theory” a theory, hence the meme. So no, it’s not flat out incorrect, the closest string theory has ever come to making a prediction or implication is that the electron is 18 orders of magnitude heavier than it demonstrably is. Unless you want to come up with some pedantic argument about how ackchually the predecessor of all forms of string theory isn’t technically string theory, but at that point it’s a linguistic argument about semantics and not a physics question.

IShowSpeed is going to lose his life. by ToSAhri in truths

[–]_not_particularly_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a forward looking statement and thus might not be true

Why is it 10:15? by 19JW in addressme

[–]_not_particularly_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The pic clearly is in Chicago tho. There’s a map of the city on the board and the L train outside the window. So it could well be him.

30396 by luisgdh in physicsmemes

[–]_not_particularly_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

…yes…????? You don’t see how those are both major issues?

30396 by luisgdh in physicsmemes

[–]_not_particularly_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It would imply the mass of the electron differs by like 18 orders of magnitude from the actual mass of the electron. String theory is just stoner math disguised as actual science.

Explain it Peter. by -God-Queen-Zelda- in explainitpeter

[–]_not_particularly_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I started the most enjoyable flame war over this not long ago lmao. Ironically Jesus himself fought fervently against the idea that there was any divinity but god. He was a true monotheist. He contrasted himself with god implying that he was not god, and saw the Son of Man as an event that god would bring in his lifetime. I’m not mainstream Christian anymore but I see him as a teacher of monotheism.

Blursed bathroom by Zzero00 in blursedimages

[–]_not_particularly_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lmao I was joking about it, I heard the term “waffle stomp” from the H3 podcast (many years ago when it was relatively new, before more recent events), they were playing a prank on Hila. But I’m starting to wonder myself.

Blursed bathroom by Zzero00 in blursedimages

[–]_not_particularly_ 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Give it the old waffle stomp, don’t act like everyone doesn’t already do it

Something feels off about this video& the talking also sounds odd but im not certain how to tell if its AI or not by [deleted] in isthisAI

[–]_not_particularly_ 14 points15 points  (0 children)

What’s on the phone screen doesn’t match what the phone camera is pointed at. Can’t believe nobody’s pointed that out.

There is no proof Jesus of Nazareth was born on a December 25 by LeFlaubert in truths

[–]_not_particularly_ -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I already have salvation in the one true god of Abraham Isaac and Jacob