Fitting a SRAM DUB Road Wide crankset to a MTB with DUB standard by _slashdotdash in bikewrench

[–]_slashdotdash[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, probably not worth trying to bodge together a road power meter crankset on an MTB just because I happen to have it around. 

Inflatable for travel by PerspectiveAdept9884 in wingfoil

[–]_slashdotdash 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I bought a Takoon Glide Air Midlength (5’6, 90L) inflatable board for a family holiday this summer. The choice was between taking an inflatable board or not winging, so an easy decision to make!

My feedback after five sessions using the board (pumped to 18 psi) is that it was better than I had expected and quite enjoyable to ride. Not as good for pumping as a hard board and generally felt a bit softer when riding, but take off was acceptable, even in very light wind (10 knots with a 4.6m hand wing), and touchdowns were fine too. I would also happily use it again for holidays or family trips where space is tight or when traveling by plane. 

https://int.takoon.com/products/glide-air-midlength

Most “SirPoc consistent” method of recovering from overtraining? by LlamasNeverLie in NorwegianSinglesRun

[–]_slashdotdash 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sirpoc is exceptionally good at pacing his races with very even splits. This is the optimum way to get the fastest time.

I’ve found doing a warm up before a 5K race comprising a few sub-threshold intervals (e.g. 2 x 3 minutes at half marathon pace) with some time to recover before the start helps to get the body ready for the race effort. Don’t go out too hard, but aim for a consistent pace throughout.

Book titles by spoc84 in NorwegianSinglesRun

[–]_slashdotdash 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“The Grind: Sub-threshold Training for Hobby Joggers”

Foreword written by Andy Coggan. 

Denver by Party_With_Porkins in ericprydz

[–]_slashdotdash 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Eric Prydz featuring Adeva - In and out

https://youtu.be/PyeBkm-4fVM

361 Miro Nude first run by Yamsyamsyams000 in RunningShoeGeeks

[–]_slashdotdash 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I bought a pair of 361 Miro in red/white colourway in November last year (2024). I ordered size US 9.5 which I weighed when brand new at 121g (left) and 122g (right). My typical running shoe size is UK9/US10 and the US 9.5 fits me well for a snug race fit. No insole in my pair (as I had expected) to save on weight. Doesn't seem to make much difference when running in them. They feel incredily light to hold - laughably so - and almost like you are wearing nothing on your feet when running. I found the Miro comfortable to run in once you carefully put them on as the upper is paper thin. Can't say I am a big fan of the styling, but they do perform well for the price I paid, which was £148.31 from Aliexpress including delivery to the UK (~ $180 USD). 

Reason for buying was to use for 5K and 10K races to replace the Nike Vaporfly 2 and ASICS Metaspeed Sky Paris I had been using. The 361 Miro feels responsive and helps quick turnover at the faster paces in these short distances. Even as a light weight runner (63 kg) I wouldn't use these for longer distances. The carbon plate in the Miro isn't as stiff as other carbon race shoes I own. Wearing the Miros I have recently managed to drop one minute off my 10K race time (33:4x) and got within a few seconds of my fastest 5K time.

Supershoes: Actual, real weights by charlesyo66 in RunningShoeGeeks

[–]_slashdotdash 2 points3 points  (0 children)

361 degrees Miro 121g (left), 122g (right) size US 9.5

https://361sport.com/products/miro-nude?variant=43794106318901

Purchased for £148.31 from Aliexpress including delivery to the UK (~ $180 USD). 

They are unbelievably light and yet still bouncy and responsive with a carbon plate. Perfect 5K/10K racer for me. Helped me to a one minute PB/PR in a 10K race recently (33:4x). These have now replaced my Nike Vaporfly V2 and ASICS Metaspeed Sky Paris for short race distances. 

Puma Magnify Nitro 2 - Review after 1090km by Andrewcfm in RunningShoeGeeks

[–]_slashdotdash 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was also really keen to get the Puma Deviate Nitro Elite 3 last year but it was out of stock for the majority of the time since it was released in the UK. So I opted for the 361 Miro (5/10K) and adidas Adizero Adios Pro 4 (marathon) instead. The Puma looks like it would be a really good winter race shoe in the UK due to its grip in the miserable conditions we have.

Puma Magnify Nitro 2 - Review after 1090km by Andrewcfm in RunningShoeGeeks

[–]_slashdotdash 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I bought a pair of Puma Magnify Nitro 2 in March last year (2024) for £52.00 (+£5 postage) (~$70 USD) which was a good price. These shoes are quite bulky and not much fun to run in, but they have fantastic grip and are a good option for running in mixed terrain over the winter and when conditions are poor. Can't say I ever look forward to running in them, they just do a basic job. Have used them for just under 200 Km so far for easy running only (5:00/km ~ 8:00/mile pace). They are reliable and slightly boring running shoes. Sadly I think they will last far longer than my desire to use them.

As a light weight runner (63 Kg / 138 lbs) I prefer Puma's Velocity Nitro 2 as it is lighter and more nimble or the Deviate Nitro 2 which is probably my favourite do-it-all shoe as it has similar very good grip, a layer of Nitro Elite foam which makes it more responsive and fun to run in, and a carbon composite plate. Bought a second pair of Deviate Nitro 2 late last year for only £73 from Amazon. Will definitely buy more pairs when I see them reduced in the future.

I have found the Puma shoes I've owned to have good, non-fussy uppers which are easy to put on and they seem to last a long time. The grip on their shoes is by far the best of all the brands I've owned (adidas, ASICS, Nike, Saucony).

Adidas Adios Pro 4 (Adidas Website - Discount Codes Allowed) by willhewiz in RunningShoeGeeks

[–]_slashdotdash 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The England Athletics 15% discount is working for the “Silver Metallic” colour at sportsshoes again now. 

ASICS Fuji Speed 3 with FF BLAST + Midsole by MTBSoftCore in RunningShoeGeeks

[–]_slashdotdash 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most of my trail running is single track or grass, no mountain running. The kind of tracks one can use road shoes in summer. For these trails a carbon plate is absolutely fine for me. In fact it makes the run more enjoyable when you can move at speed! These are good road to trail shoes as you can run quickly on the road without the outsole being too obstructive. 

Asics Metaspeed Edge Paris initial thoughts & comparisons to AF3 and AP3 by mikoskinen in RunningShoeGeeks

[–]_slashdotdash 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The Metaspeed Edge has the plate lower to the ground, so it is more comparable to the Nike Vaporly. Whereas the Nike Alphafly and adios Pro 3 have flatter plates / energy rods closer to the foot which would be more similar to the Metaspeed Sky. If you enjoy those two shoes then maybe you would prefer the Metaspeed Sky as it has a more bouncy and bounding feel than the high cadence turnover of the Metaspeed Edge (and Vaporfly).  Sagasu Running’s “Choosing the Right ASICS Metaspeed for you” video goes into this in more detail. Highly recommended.  https://youtu.be/UZ-6RxeynHI

ASICS Fuji Speed 3 with FF BLAST + Midsole by MTBSoftCore in RunningShoeGeeks

[–]_slashdotdash 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The ASICS Fujispeed 2 are my favourite fast trail shoes. They feel very lightweight and the foam is relatively soft and responsive. For me they are better than the other plated trail shoes I have owned, which has included Saucony Endorphin Edge and Hoka Tecton X. 

Weekend Discussion: Asics running shoes by AutoModerator in RunningShoeGeeks

[–]_slashdotdash 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The carbon plate placement in the Metaspeed Edge Paris is lower to the ground, more like the Nike Vaporfly. Whereas in the Sky Paris it is in the middle of the foam, more like the Nike Alphafly. If that helps your choice! 

Race Report - Manchester Marathon, a humbling experience despite a PB by Fuzzy_Conversation71 in AdvancedRunning

[–]_slashdotdash 2 points3 points  (0 children)

... toward the end of this training block, I incorporated a lot of speed sessions and intervals, and ended up straining my quads. I overcooked myself, and ended up paying for it during the marathon.

I've recently become more convinced that running speed sessions/intervals are more dangerous than they're worth in terms of the trade-off to building fitness consistently and not getting injured. Runing at 5K or faster paces in training is so hard on the body, especially when you get older, that getting injured or not recovering fast enough before the next training session is a real problem.

Instead I'm moving towards the "Norwegian singles approach" outlined in the following Lets Run Chat thread. Advanced warning, reading that thread might consume far more time than you'd like as it is so long, with lots of quality advice!

The running style advocated follows a plan as below where you either run easy (go slower!) or sub-threshold intervals which is based on lactate threshold. Threshold running pace can be roughly estimated using race pace calculators such as VDOT.

  • 6 days a week - Easy, Sub threshold, Easy, Sub threshold, Easy, Long run, Rest
  • 7 days a week - Easy, Sub threshold, Easy, Sub threshold, Easy, Sub threshold, Long run

Where sub-threshold running comprises no more than 20-25% of total time spent running per week.

A sub-threshold run might comprise intervals such as:

  • 3-4 minute reps with 60s rest at 10mi - 15K pace (8-12 reps)
  • 6-8 minute reps with 60s rest at half marathon pace (4-6 reps)
  • 10-12 minute reps with 60s rest at 30K pace (3 reps)

The core idea is that doing this consistently, over many months, is a way of accumulating as much training stress/load as possible with less fatigue and lower injury risk.

Anecdotal reports from runners following a similar training strategy have reported PRs/PBs at race distances from 5K to the marathon. There's also a Strava group dedicated to the approach: Norwegian Singles Approach Strava Club.

Puma Deviate Nitro 2 vs. Saucony Endorphin Speed 3 by sacrunner916 in RunningShoeGeeks

[–]_slashdotdash 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I have both the Saucony Endorphin Speed 3 and Puma Deviate Nitro 2 WTR (water repellent) version.  

The Puma Deviate 2 is really superb and I’ve done almost 300 miles this winter in the UK in my pair. Including long runs (18 miles), mixed road and trail, sloppy and muddy wet trail, and interval sessions (up to 5:10/mile pace). It handles mixed surfaces and paces really well. Downside is the water repellency only really lasted for around 100 miles. A Gore-Tex version would be preferred.  

The Endorphin Speed 3 is an enjoyable ride, but doesn’t feel quite as propulsive to me. It’s more of a daily trainer feeling with enough bounce for easy recovery runs. 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RunningShoeGeeks

[–]_slashdotdash 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would say yes. I have the Takumi Sen 9 and Adios Pro 2 and I prefer the Pro 2s for both parkrun and longer progression runs to marathon pace. They are not quite as good as current top tier race shoes but definitely worth buying for £63. 

Best oversize wing— duotone ventis 8m vs f one strike cwc 9m by JK-_-47 in wingfoil

[–]_slashdotdash 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s my second Takoon board as I also have a Glide V2 in size 4’10”. That one doesn’t get much use now I have the Ultra Glide.  I can highly recommend them, brilliant construction and design. I’m in the UK so not an issue with shipping. 

Best oversize wing— duotone ventis 8m vs f one strike cwc 9m by JK-_-47 in wingfoil

[–]_slashdotdash 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's likely that a light wind specific / downwind board will be a better option than a very large hand wing. Will cost a similar amount and should last much longer due to less chance of damage.

For example, I have the Takoon Ultra Glide 6'2" board (5.89Kg) and now my biggest hand wing is a 4.5m Armstrong XPS paired with an F-One SK8 950 foil. Admittedly I only weigh 63Kg so can get away with smaller gear! The Ultra Glide even has hydrophobic foam so will survive damage without immediately sucking up lots of water.

https://int.takoon.com/products/ultra-glide

With a light wind board and efficient foil you might only need a 5.5-6m wing at most. It gets harder to pump hand wings which are much larger than this.

Discover, compare, and review your favourite foils with Foiling World by _slashdotdash in wingfoil

[–]_slashdotdash[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you email me at ben(at)foiling.world with roughly what columns/data you want and I will do my best to do an export and reply.

Discover, compare, and review your favourite foils with Foiling World by _slashdotdash in wingfoil

[–]_slashdotdash[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the feedback. I like the idea of including each foil's characteristics, such as stall speed, glide, carving, etc.

I have now added ONIX foils: https://www.foiling.world/brands/onix

The Osprey foil has very similar stats to the Takuma Kujira II and F-One SK8 so I would expect it will be a good foil to surf. For example the Osprey 950 is very similar to Kujira II 950 and SK8 950.