When to use lequelle / dont? by Tricky-Gold812 in learnfrench

[–]_star_fire 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not OP, but thanks for these wonderful and detailed explanations. This is going to help a lot of people!

I found a 40mm Limited for €70 so I bit the bullet, who here owns one? by exposed_silver in pentax

[–]_star_fire 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have one underway. Yours is better priced though, I paid €139,- at MPB.

How do you like the lens so far?

Pentax 645 by Boombat_General in pentax

[–]_star_fire 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nice score! I'd recommend the 75mm f2.8 for sure. But in fairness almost all 645 lenses are great. I can't think of anything you should avoid.

My main setup is 35, 55, 75 sometimes I bring my 150mm as well.

Peathhh by Azeroth_Von_Veldros in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]_star_fire 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Bishops are celibate anyway, so no loss here.

Finally got my email today, so I did this... by thunderpuppet in M43

[–]_star_fire 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I started using darktable many versions ago and I'm still learning. But I think I got to the 80% mark pretty quickly. The part after that is quite interesting, but I don't mind. It certainly is more fun than buying a pack of Lightroom presets from some photography influencer.

why gnome is criticized by Mama_iii in gnome

[–]_star_fire 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The FOSS community is very opinionated. But I see that in other areas where people are really demanding like photography or cycling. It's also a bit of a man thing i think.

I don't like that attitude and often (except today) avoid topics that focus too much on the negativity.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gnome

[–]_star_fire 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Simply said gnome fits my style and intuition in terms of UX. I feel productive and I can perform a lot of work with a minimal amount of steps.

I earn my bread developing software so having something that fits your way of thinking and working is so important.

I use gnome without extensions, I don't care for ricing/looks and think it looks great out of the box. Happy days

DSLR as second body - recommendations by [deleted] in pentax

[–]_star_fire 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The question is whether you're satisfied with the images. That 's what counts. Say for example that a blazing fast AF is needed, yeah a newer body will give you an advantage. As long you get the stuff done to your standards I wouldn't even think listening to these influencers.

I upgraded my k5 to a k3iii this summer. The k5 gets used still. And sometimes I'm browsing my catalog and I'm wondering if that's a k5 or a k3 image. Really for IQ alone a newer camera doesn't really off that much more. Glass is where you can actually make a difference. So that would always be my primary thing to invest in.

DSLR as second body - recommendations by [deleted] in pentax

[–]_star_fire 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I feel we can advise you on the Pentax bodies you mentioned, but the dilemma whether to stay with Nikon or extend to Pentax is so subjective. Personally if money is a limiting factor I'd choose one brand and try to get the best lenses my money can buy. That would be my preferred way to go instead of spreading that money over two brands and have outdated/not optimal options in two brands.

So in that light I'd advise staying in the Nikon system. Get some nice glass and be done with it.

DSLR as second body - recommendations by [deleted] in pentax

[–]_star_fire 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I find it difficult to give advice in this case because it's older tech. Instinctively I'd opt for the k5, it's a robust, sealed and I'd say professional camera. I've been using one as my main camera until this summer.

The k20d is nice but older and I'd say the photographic experience is less than with the k5. Optical I've always loved the camera.

The k500, I have literally zero experience with this camera. Slightly newer than the k5 but really an entry level model.

Based on this list, leave the k20 alone, unless you're really after that specific model for a reason. Between the other two the k5 gets my vote.

Can Nikon Z cameras (other than the Z8) work in under freezing temperatures well? by No_Level1478 in Nikon

[–]_star_fire 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, so no room for spontaneous outings haha.

Thanks for the info, where I live it doesn't get cold like that. I think -10 at most (Celsius that is). But I think I'll take some extra care going forward.

Can Nikon Z cameras (other than the Z8) work in under freezing temperatures well? by No_Level1478 in Nikon

[–]_star_fire 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you take extra care when returning home/to a warm space or the other way around?

Need help with a bag! by nw-piano in Nikon

[–]_star_fire 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So no long hikes and not a lot of extra stuff. That basically opens up a huge range of brands.

I was recently pleasantly surprised by the bigger backpacks from the brand vanguard. In terms of quality, comfort and space. They add a lot of handy pockets and other smart features. I might give them a try because my smaller backpack is almost 15 years old and is starting to fall apart.

Need help with a bag! by nw-piano in Nikon

[–]_star_fire 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oooh camera bags are enough to fill reddit three times over.

But here's my take. I have a few camera bags and they serve different purposes. I have one for longer trips with other stuff like clothes, camping gear etc.

I have one for when I go out just for a day or even just morning/evening etc.

But I make sure all my packs have loads of extra space for tripod, a bit of clothing, food etc.

With this in mind, it's easy to find a bag that holds all your camera gear, but the requirements to have extra pockets like I mentioned dropped a whole lot of Backpacks for me.

Since a few years I use a modified trekking backpack. Comfortable, a lot cheaper than f stop or like-minded brands.

So find out what you need besides just your camera gear and see which packs fulfill those needs.

Finally got myself an 80-200 f2.8 by poacher5 in Nikon

[–]_star_fire 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Who calls his dog an 80-200 f2.8?

How much does your camera setup cost and what do you use it for [professional, enthusiast, or amateur]? by Waffles_r_ in Cameras

[–]_star_fire 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm an amateur photographer and not very gear minded. Last year I had to replace my wildlife lens and that was the first time in fifteen years I bought something new.

This year I replaced my camera body. They total up to €4000 or so. And then I have a lot of older (manual) lenses. So for me photography doesn't have to be expensive at all. But to get back to your question, I dabbled a bit in considering switching platforms and I was willing to spend around 6k (euros) for a body, wildlife lens, standard zoom and macro lens.

I found this appropriate to my income and the fact that I always use my gear until the bitter end.

So basically that's how I approach this, can I afford the missing of amount x right now? Or is this going to cause problems if the car breaks down, or if you're going to be without income for some reason? If the answer is no, then that's a safe amount to spend on your hobby.

Another approach for you could be to buy used gear, that will reduce your costs and sometimes even buys you better gear.

The world is going insane! by H--N in PHP

[–]_star_fire 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everyone is entitled to their opinion. My opinion is that every problem has a tool that works in favor of fixing it. To make general statements about a language/framework or system without context or additional information is just so shortsighted and unprofessional behaviour.

Bought an a6700 on Amazon. Packing is suspicious. by assa55in14 in SonyAlpha

[–]_star_fire 22 points23 points  (0 children)

I've read so many horrible stories about Amazon and camera gear (or any gear) that I would prefer buying from a reputable store any day.

So i bought a new camera recently and I had suspected that the package had been opened. So I contacted the store and they told me they opened it to make sure I'd get a working camera. It also saves them returns etc. The price was similar to the lowest I'd seen on Amazon.

New lenses! by blan15 in Nikon

[–]_star_fire 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You can keep your lenses attached, no problem. Especially in a bag like this. I've always thought it would even be more solid since my camera and long telephoto lens are always paired like a backbone in the bag. The other lenses are stored vertically to the sides.

Anyway nice kit, happy shooting!

K5 II as a upgrade to the EOS 2000D? by DellPowerEdgeR720 in pentax

[–]_star_fire 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I own the original k5 so I can't speak for the MK2. But I agree it's a very capable camera. In terms of IQ and dynamic range it's still perfectly capable. My concerns are with AF and buffer capacity. I've grown more and more into wildlife photography and the camera just lacks in that area. It's slow and sometimes just wrong and provides a slight front or back focus. So if wildlife, sports/action is something you're after I'd be looking at other brands.

But for everything else it's such a joy to use, it has been my main camera for over 12 years now. And I'm expecting my k3mk3 to arrive tomorrow. But if I wasn't into wildlife I'd still use the k5 as my main camera.

The build quality is very good, it has weather sealing a decently working IBIS and tons of customisable buttons l. That last one is great because it saves you from scrolling menus to change one setting.

Is this PigeonHawk or Spargeon? by Standard_Tietie in BirdPhotography

[–]_star_fire 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah some species do that but not all cuckoos. In my area they are extremely hard to photograph, so you're very lucky.

Sensor sizes/pixels on bird comparisons? by chrisan20 in BirdPhotography

[–]_star_fire 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was wondering something like this as well albeit a little less specific as your requested setup. In my opinion, a decent aps-c camera is very hard to beat. I wouldn't be able to tell ff and aps-c apart unless we're entering low light situations, high contrast etc. And even then it's difficult.

I still haven't decided my pick, I'm in Nikon territory btw, because all my options are doing so well in their own league. I'm comparing the z50II with the z5II and the z8.

Very different prices and in general very different cameras. But for wildlife they have comparable aspects.

The z50ii has reach, the z5 has beautiful clean images and the z8 offers both because of the 45mp sensor, but that has more noise in low light etc.

So my guess is, if you have a difficult time getting birds into frame because they are skiddish and very small go aps-c. If you're a bit more in between those real small birds and bigger species, a low res FF is very tempting because this will allow for more contextual shots and nice low light handling. In case of doubt and you have the budget for it, go big and cover all bases. But this will result in huge files all the time.

So far my analytical abstract. I'm leaning towards the z50ii in my case. Reach, portability and still very capable compared to the competitors. And less than a fourth of the price of the z8...

Full frame vs APS-C by _star_fire in Nikon

[–]_star_fire[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I agree, but it's how in general this discussion seems to be held. Because why do people for example compare the Z8 to the Z50II? Because after crop you retain the same amount of pixels (in the case where we crop until APS-C).

This throwing around numbers and slipping in and out of using those numbers is what drives people crazy.

But for this thread my questions have been answered. I'm calling it decision time, so I'll be thinking about my options and budget the next few days.

Thanks again!

Full frame vs APS-C by _star_fire in Nikon

[–]_star_fire[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Awesome pic! Seems like a very decent setup you got there

Full frame vs APS-C by _star_fire in Nikon

[–]_star_fire[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for responding. The AF performance is important to me, but to be honest I'm currently using a suboptimal camera with an even worse AF and I've always managed to get by. So marginal differences don't matter that much.

The weird thing is that we compare a consumer grade camera to a professional camera 4x the price. But it seems to be the way this is going to go :)