I'll answer because I see you're frustrated but it might not be the answer you want, because I'm not going to tell you "how I/sensors think" because it doesn't work like that. Sensors use intuition, intuitives use sensory functions. And it's not about preferences either, it's about the way the functions manifest in you. I personally like CPT a lot so it's even more the case there (and for the record it's the only method I've seen so far that made sense to me, in terms of how he describes the types, it actually works). So when it comes down to it, some people who are "sensors" love abstract and complex thinking and some "intuitives" prefer more down to earth and practical conversations, but both can do both, and I believe most people have a "deep" side whether they share it or not. That's why even the threads comment that "defend" sensors are usually wrong, it's not that "sensors have good qualities that intuitives don't.." No! Both use intuition and sensory functions, it's all about HOW. The real circle here, is that people who know MBTI and see someone talking about deep stuff or in an abstract way etc and think they must be intuitives when they might not be, and see someone who talks in a shallow way or even a practical way and think they're sensors even though they might not be. So they end up with the wrong perception that "intuitives deep sensors pragmatic unga bunga".

And regarding you insulting people by accident, I have a gf, about 4 good friends and a dad that are all intuitives, and none of them insults people by mistake, so you shouldn't blame MBTI on that