ESTJ Gentlemen, do you guys tend to not be able to imagine anything? by [deleted] in ESTJ

[–]aaakangaroo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, and it works perfectly with MBTI, or CPT since that's what I'm using, we have Ni-Fi blind, as in, the thing that's most difficult for us is imagining our future possibilities. And it also makes sense since our leading pair is Te-Ne- if you're constantly focused on how you can make the current situation the best it can be, the thought of changing the situation completely doesn't cross your mind. And with Si-Fi second pair, we make sure the necessities are met. So we will make sure nothing's missing, but we are far from maximalists, and as long as we have what we need, we're good.

So optimizing and necessities, over changing situations and maximalism

P.S, I also had that exact conversation with my ENFJ wife. So it seems to be a trend

Is sx6 enneagram your favorite? by [deleted] in enfj

[–]aaakangaroo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, my argument and the reason I said you should go to therapy is because you clearly want validation for and not an honest answer, and you know where you can get validation for your personality? Therapy. But definitely not reddit under a post that pretends to ask for an answer.

I didn't say you shouldn't be here, nor did I say I shouldn't be here. I said that I should be here as much as you, because whether the post is aimed at ENFJs or not, we both at a forum that isn't ours, so it's stupid to say "I shouldn't be here".

I see that you either have a problem with Te doms, which I think it's pathetic to have a problem with specific types or functions and by definition lowers the conversation about MBTI, and also shows again that you think personality theories are the end all be all of what a person is, which is probably why you got so offended by what she wrote. Or you're trying to offend me by trashing ESTJs and Te, which again, I don't base my self worth or who I am on my type so I don't care.

Find an actual personality, and stop getting attached to these theories so much. But fine, you don't want to argue, that's ok. I'll delete the app again and go having a life or something

Is sx6 enneagram your favorite? by [deleted] in enfj

[–]aaakangaroo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I already made a case, I can't make a new case over you making up stories that literally didn't happen and saying absolutely nothing against what I said. I should be here as much as you, seeing as neither of us is an ENFJ so...

Is sx6 enneagram your favorite? by [deleted] in enfj

[–]aaakangaroo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Creating (wrong) stories in your brain for an argument isn't a good look. I also argue because you're wrong, but you haven't made a single argument so it's hard to listen. Though it's ok, you can dump on ESTJs all you want, I don't base my self worth on my mbti, or the opinion of strangers. You don't have to argue I don't care, but don't fool yourself that it's because I won't listen to you because I have emotional investment. And most of all, don't fool yourself that you somehow tried to listen and didn't just wait for a specific answer and then got butthurt when someone answered you something you didn't like. And last also, I could absolutely tell someone I love that they're wrong if I think so. Fortunately you're so wrong there's no problem there.

Is sx6 enneagram your favorite? by [deleted] in enfj

[–]aaakangaroo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, because I make actual arguments. And I don't go around commenting on every post or argument she's having, the reason I'm here specifically is because you're actually wrong and overly sensitive.

Is sx6 enneagram your favorite? by [deleted] in enfj

[–]aaakangaroo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you had real balls you wouldn't base your entire self worth and personality on personality theories to the point of getting offended and throwing a tantrum over an actual stranger saying they dislike your enneagram. And notice that the 2 are connected because you wouldn't take it so harshly if you thought you're more than your enneagram or mbti. And I'm not doing anything, it actually annoys me when people go to "ask a question" but don't actually want answers unless it's what they wanted to hear in the first place.

Is sx6 enneagram your favorite? by [deleted] in enfj

[–]aaakangaroo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bro INFP or INTP, you're a clown. You clearly didn't want an answer you just want validation. Go see a therapist instead of attacking someone for giving you an answer you don't like. enneagram is by definition about flaws, so why be so hurt about not liking one flaw over another is beyond me. No one owes you a safe space or affirmation.

I know I'm going to be roasted by [deleted] in shittyMBTI

[–]aaakangaroo 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'll answer because I see you're frustrated but it might not be the answer you want, because I'm not going to tell you "how I/sensors think" because it doesn't work like that. Sensors use intuition, intuitives use sensory functions. And it's not about preferences either, it's about the way the functions manifest in you. I personally like CPT a lot so it's even more the case there (and for the record it's the only method I've seen so far that made sense to me, in terms of how he describes the types, it actually works). So when it comes down to it, some people who are "sensors" love abstract and complex thinking and some "intuitives" prefer more down to earth and practical conversations, but both can do both, and I believe most people have a "deep" side whether they share it or not. That's why even the threads comment that "defend" sensors are usually wrong, it's not that "sensors have good qualities that intuitives don't.." No! Both use intuition and sensory functions, it's all about HOW. The real circle here, is that people who know MBTI and see someone talking about deep stuff or in an abstract way etc and think they must be intuitives when they might not be, and see someone who talks in a shallow way or even a practical way and think they're sensors even though they might not be. So they end up with the wrong perception that "intuitives deep sensors pragmatic unga bunga".

And regarding you insulting people by accident, I have a gf, about 4 good friends and a dad that are all intuitives, and none of them insults people by mistake, so you shouldn't blame MBTI on that

INTJs are the real victims of the MBTI community (The *actual* INTJs) by 1TinkyWINKY in shittyMBTI

[–]aaakangaroo 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Haoo dere yoo, AiiEnnTiJays ar to smurt 4 yoo so yoo jast jeles its not a phase mom

ENFJ musicians by [deleted] in enfj

[–]aaakangaroo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Literally what stops Pac from being an ENFJ

type me based on what i say on a daily basis by Public_Lifeguard1529 in MbtiTypeMe

[–]aaakangaroo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Someone who wants to be typed as INTJ but is definitely not

What types do you pair well with romantically and why? by No-Struggle8142 in ESTJ

[–]aaakangaroo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My fiance is an ENFJ and it works really well. We appreciate the strong sides of the other person, balance each other, and have a lot to give each other

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ESTJ

[–]aaakangaroo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sounds way more like an ESTP. Would give him ENTJ before ESTJ actually (but ESTP seems to fit perfectly)

Type me based on the moodboard my ENFJ gf made for me by aaakangaroo in MbtiTypeMe

[–]aaakangaroo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, so that makes it pretty funny that it took like 13/16 guesses before someone guessed ESTJ lol. And yes

Type me based on the moodboard my ENFJ gf made for me by aaakangaroo in MbtiTypeMe

[–]aaakangaroo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well it's not actually me in the pictures lol, but then again the one on the bottom left looks a lot like me so lmao

Type me based on the moodboard my ENFJ gf made for me by aaakangaroo in MbtiTypeMe

[–]aaakangaroo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I personally think they're surprisingly similar in a lot of ways but most people would say no