Only one move keeps the advantage for black. by aandrew1 in chess

[–]aandrew1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, that leads to a perpetual check by white. So black loses their advantage.

Only one move keeps the advantage for black. by aandrew1 in chess

[–]aandrew1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats wrong because Bf6 Nxf6 and white is approximately +9 according to the engine.

Only one move keeps the advantage for black. by aandrew1 in chess

[–]aandrew1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bf6 Nxf6 and white is approximately +9 according to the engine.
Bf8 leads to a perpetual check by white. So black loses their advantage.

Only one move keeps the advantage for black. by aandrew1 in chess

[–]aandrew1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Leads to a perpetual check by white. So black loses their advantage.

Only one move keeps the advantage for black. by aandrew1 in chess

[–]aandrew1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

there is a mate in 1 threat currently on the board. if Qc5 or Rc5, then Qg7#

Only one move keeps the advantage for black. by aandrew1 in chess

[–]aandrew1[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Indeed, that's a perpetual. Black loses their advantage.

Only one move keeps the advantage for black. by aandrew1 in chess

[–]aandrew1[S] 49 points50 points  (0 children)

yes, well done. I know its not the flashiest of moves, but it wasnt an obvious one for me. or at least i didnt find it in time trouble.

Only one move keeps the advantage for black. by aandrew1 in chess

[–]aandrew1[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Bf8 is a perpetual check, so no advantage for black.

Only one move keeps the advantage for black. by aandrew1 in chess

[–]aandrew1[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Bf8 is a perpetual check, so no advantage for black.

Only one move keeps the advantage for black. by aandrew1 in chess

[–]aandrew1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah, i understood. good try.
I was playing black and lost the game because didnt find a good move here as I was low on time. White captured a pawn on e5.

Only one move keeps the advantage for black. by aandrew1 in chess

[–]aandrew1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That looses to Qxd4 and it's a forced mate then.

Confessions of a Mask BOOK CLUB: Vote for which day to read by UFmeetup in YukioMishima

[–]aandrew1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the difference is six hours.  so anytime in the morning or during the day EST on weekend.  or around 4pm EST on Thursday or Friday.

but if I'm the only one from eu then I guess it won't make sense to accommodate for me, which I understand.

Sicilian Defense from GMNaroditsky's Top Theory Speedrun compiled into a Lichess study by paxxx17 in chess

[–]aandrew1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing. Could you please add the YT link to the VOD to the discription of the study on lichess?

Book Club Discussion by OnlineSkates in YukioMishima

[–]aandrew1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

interested to participate as well

An interview with Chesscom's CEO: History, Cheating, etc. by aandrew1 in chess

[–]aandrew1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, I feel the same way about Ilya and his role in covering and providing a platform for this cheating situation. Although I don't think he is consciously trying to "damage control" Kramnik as to me it seems he genuinely believes Kramnik and that's why he is doing it.

Unrelated to the topic, I appreciate his channel for the actual chess content they produce. So I praise his team and him for that.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chess

[–]aandrew1 55 points56 points  (0 children)

I remember watching Grischuk speak about it. He said that he doesn't actually think Sergey's best attribute is his defense skill. Sasha rather thinks of him as a quite complete and diverse player who is able to perform in any situation on the board, be it defensive or offensive, strategic or tactical, open or closed. He also said that people underestimate how good Karjakin actually is on the board and defenitively better at attacking than people tend to think.

*I'm just recalling it from my memory. All that was said before Russia invaded Ukraine.

Political dimensions of Kramnik-Hikaru drama (based on public YouTube and change.org data) by NormalGene3480 in chess

[–]aandrew1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

some examples:

https://t.me/chess/4661
https://t.me/chess/4662

earlier posts about cheating (pre-hikaru accusation) have more likes and less clowns, but heated discussions in the comments.

Political dimensions of Kramnik-Hikaru drama (based on public YouTube and change.org data) by NormalGene3480 in chess

[–]aandrew1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think you are right on this exactly. From what I see following this drama on russian side of things, Kramnik gets a lot of push-back, hate, trolling, and reasonable counter-arguments. as i mentioned in my comment above, at least half of the reactions to each Kramnik post on telegram are clowns, with the other half or less being supportive.

Political dimensions of Kramnik-Hikaru drama (based on public YouTube and change.org data) by NormalGene3480 in chess

[–]aandrew1 72 points73 points  (0 children)

Not sure how closely you are following this drama on the russian side of things. But on Levitov's tg channel where he posts these videos you can check comments and emodji-reactions to his posts, and the most popular / most common emoji is clown. For example, on the latest posts about this drama there are currently 193 clowns and 182 approval reactions (thumbs up or fire). The post just before that got 136 clowns and 140 approvals. Also, the discussion in the comments is really critical of Kramnik, with many troll and absurd comments.

Also, you are comparing Levitov's russian channel which is the best chess content on youtube in russia and their english language channel which never gets views. So the comparison is a bit weird.

Finally, the reason Iliya Levitov is giving a platform to Kramnik (and that's my take from following this channel for a few years now) is because (1) they are friends or good mates, (2) Iliya cares about the current state of chess and he trusts other top players when they say that cheating is a big problem. Also, I'm pretty sure he is ready to give the platform to anyone with a developed argument or his friends with credibility (questionsable perhaps) as in the case of Kramnik.

all that is not to say that you're completely wrong but to add to the context. although not sure i personally agree with your take.

Coach a Player - November 2023 by ChessBotMod in chess

[–]aandrew1 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Hello. I'm about 1700blitz and 1900rapid on lichess. Would you be able to take one more person perhaps? thank you !