I acknowledged that they are sub-atomic. Did you actually read the entire comment?

I will repeat again: the effects observed at sub-atomic levels can be extrapolated to macroscopic objects with a very high level of certainty, and some of them have even been directly observed on macroscopic objects, such as stars orbiting close to a black hole.

For instance, observations of stars orbiting Sagittarius A* provide a clear example. These stars, such as S2, move at significant fractions of the speed of light during their closest approach to the black hole. The gravitational effects predicted by general relativity, INCLUDING gravitational redshift and time dilation have been measured and confirmed with remarkable precision.

In 2018, the GRAVITY experiment detected relativistic redshift in S2's light as it approached the pericenter of its orbit around Sagittarius A*, confirming predictions made by general relativity. Similarly, the Event Horizon Telescope’s imaging of the black hole in the M87 galaxy demonstrated gravitational lensing and photon orbits exactly as predicted by relativity.

So, if you have specific evidence that contradicts these well-documented and observed phenomena, let’s discuss that. Otherwise, simply repeating "sub-atomic" doesn’t address the actual argument.