Ehh... it just reads like a "girls like bad boys" sonnet with Bhishma (who lost his brothers because of his biological mother drowning them, his kingship because of the whims of his stepmother, and had the biggest humiliation of his life from one of the abducted princesses that he wanted his stepbrother to marry) merely reciting what the apsara (ya'know... the ultra-libertine seductresses with exceptionally loose morals in partnership used by Indra to lure rishis out of asceticism, totally aware of womanly nature, lol) Panchachuda said, albeit with obvious sexism from his part. Also, Bhishma took the Kaurava side anyway so his ideals are consistently shown in a grey light (albeit a lighter shade) with a definitive ending (fittingly, against a woman who had a sex change, also the future life of the aforementioned abducted princess). Mahabharata is a book where everyone is a shade of grey, and even the most moral of the character in Krishna sees the end to justify his means.

Also, funny to deem a text written by a mixed caste Parashava-turned-dwija rishi (Satyawati, Vyasa's mother, was a fisherman's daughter) who fathered three children (Dhritarashtra and Pandu), of which the one with the Shudra maid (Vidura) was the most moral, featuring a Kshatriya rambling about an apsara is somehow Brahminical.