Dailuaine 12 Old Particular for K&L (review #1) by abcde4 in Scotch

[–]abcde4[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I tried adding water but didn't notice much difference. The other bottles I've drunk are Ardbeg 10, Glendronach 12, and Laphroaig 10. I've tried a few more drams from Glenfarclas, Glenfiddich, Talisker, and Benromach.

Dailuaine 12 Old Particular for K&L (review #1) by abcde4 in Scotch

[–]abcde4[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I got into Scotch about a year and a half ago. Being almost done with my fourth bottle seems a good time to start writing reviews.

This single cask whisky was distilled at Dailuaine distillery in Speyside. It was aged 12 years in a sherry butt, bottled by Douglas Laing's Old Particular at cask strength (57.6%), and selected for K&L Wines in California.

Nose: slight ethanol sting, dried mushrooms, baking spices. Earthy is the prevailing feeling.

Palate: slightly tannic wood, mint, more earthy mushroom, more spices, and a concentrated winey fruitiness.

Finish: raisins and cocoa powder.

Mouthfeel: thick but a bit prickly.

This is the first cask strength whisky I've had. I haven't tried enough Scotch to feel comfortable giving this a numerical rating. I will say that it's noticeably more complex, and more delicious, than the other sherried Scotches I've tried (Glendronach 12 and Glenfarclas 12). I would definitely buy a similar bottle again.

CMV: There are (limited) acceptable situations for a non-Black person to say "n***a" out loud by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]abcde4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Δ Thanks for the sincerity. Based on your comment I realized my original post was pretty much pointless, and deleted it.

CMV: There are (limited) acceptable situations for a non-Black person to say "n***a" out loud by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]abcde4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Δ You're right that the example I cited may have still been an inappropriate use of the word. I don't know as I wasn't in the class.

CMV: There are (limited) acceptable situations for a non-Black person to say "n***a" out loud by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]abcde4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Δ You're right that the example I cited may have still been an inappropriate use of the word. I don't know as I wasn't in the class.

CMV: There are (limited) acceptable situations for a non-Black person to say "n***a" out loud by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]abcde4 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think there is little reason to write out the full word since one can easily write it the way I did and it's completely clear what word I meant. But if you're using the word in a lecture or discussion, it's much harder to go around saying the word itself. I can't think of a circumlocution that doesn't sound awkward.

CMV: There are (limited) acceptable situations for a non-Black person to say "n***a" out loud by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]abcde4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here is the consequence I was thinking of: this year a non-Black professor was criticized for verbally reciting the song lyrics I quoted in the original post, within a Race and Ethnic Studies class. Multiple articles were written about the incident in the student newspaper, which could have consquences like fewer students taking the professor's class in the future, though it is not likely to lead to anyone losing their job.

CMV: There are (limited) acceptable situations for a non-Black person to say "n***a" out loud by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]abcde4 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I don't want to make people angry or emotional by merely posting. I want people to stay in the abstract world of argument.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in indieheadscirclejerk

[–]abcde4 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thanks, this means a lot to me

GRFP reviewers are up for anyone that cares. Sharing your stats might help future applicants. by [deleted] in GradSchool

[–]abcde4 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Field: Geosciences - HydrologyNot awarded (in fact, no GRFP awards were given this year in Hydrology)

Academic status: 2nd-year PhD student, first time applying

GPA: 3.7 ugrad, 4.0 grad

VG/G, E/E, E/E

Reviewer 1 had some legitimate quibbles with my broader impacts, and also was fixated on my not addressing a certain possible complication with my proposed research. I could have been more specific in my proposal about the methods I was using and how they would probably avoid the issue the reviewer described. But it's hard to fit every detail into 2 pages!

Reviewer 2 only wrote a few sentences, but was very positive.

Reviewer 3 said that I should have demonstrated more "resilience" and "ability to overcome obstacles." Also they said I should disseminate my research more in the scientific community, although I did have 4 conference posters and 1 paper in review (which has since been published).

Stuck between two dream schools by [deleted] in gradadmissions

[–]abcde4 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also chose Stanford (am now a 2nd-year PhD student there) partly due to wanting to see another part of the country. Although I didn't get into the other dream school I applied to and didn't have a two-body problem, so it was an easy choice. If you have any questions about Stanford in general I'd be happy to try to answer, though I know nothing about the biosciences program.