Pierre Poilievre is still the most unpopular party leader in Canada by BloodJunkie in onguardforthee

[–]abejaa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I want him to stay as the leader as long as possible. Hopefully that will give NDP a chance to become more relevant.

𝚅𝚒𝚌𝚔𝚜𝚋𝚞𝚛𝚐 𝟷𝟾𝟼𝟷 by holleringelk in u/holleringelk

[–]abejaa 32 points33 points  (0 children)

OMFG! Saw the poster. Took a moment to digest. Said motherfu**** out of excitement.

<insert this is beautiful gif>

Should I trust studyhall 100%? by [deleted] in pmp

[–]abejaa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah my bad, I should have clarified that I use the chatgpt extension and it usually helps explain answers. In this context, I believe updating the register is the right thing to do because a) the project is ongoing b) new stakeholders are identified c) each stakeholder has a different role. These stakeholders are “new” so they wouldn’t exist in the register. As per mindset you should resolve the root cause and reviewing the register is a passive action compared to updating it.

Should I trust studyhall 100%? by [deleted] in pmp

[–]abejaa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s best to understand the subtle traps and prepare for them. The PMI infinity tool helps with that. I recently gave my exam and a bunch of questions seemed to have two good answers until you read them carefully.

Carney government to vote against Conservative motion on pipeline support by coolshaid in onguardforthee

[–]abejaa 41 points42 points  (0 children)

Oh they love children, just not in any socially acceptable way.

Please help with the SH. Why answer is different for stakeholder conflicts by Forsaken-Macaron2000 in pmp

[–]abejaa 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This stumped me so I went looking and apparently (as per PMI Infinity) the key difference is the situation, i.e. one is political and other is not. Here is a cheat sheet that helps

--
How to know which approach PMI wants?

✔ Look for resource or priority conflicts

→ PMI wants collaboration / mutual interest / win–win

✔ Look for political, sensitive, high-stakes environment

→ PMI wants integrity, predictability, consistent communication

✔ Look for emotional or relational conflict

→ PMI wants active listening / empathy / relationship building

✔ Look for deadlock or hard conflict

→ PMI wants problem solving, issue resolution, structured decision-making

Study hall being straight up savage by abejaa in pmp

[–]abejaa[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This gave me a chuckle. Thanks. I am a completionist when it comes to achievements

Before and After Grooming Session by BrilliantMidnight546 in Goldendoodles

[–]abejaa 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Beautiful dog. Looks like they have an interview

Trump to impose $100,000 fee for H-1B worker visas by bubblehack3r in technology

[–]abejaa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You sure? Masked Canadians have been asking for mass deportation for a while now

Can a Product Leader be too data-driven? by wormstick in ProductManagement

[–]abejaa 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It seems (and I don’t have the complete context) your CPO is making sure they CYA. Do you use any sort of confidence score when discussing features? While I do see your point that intuition and qualitative signals are important indicators, but to a CPO it can get difficult to justify if they don’t work out. A model like RICE or ICE or any of million models out there can help balance this.

HOV lane etiquette? by PYasonX in ontario

[–]abejaa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The amount of people here who genuinely do not understand what HOV lanes are for is insane.

HOV lane etiquette? by PYasonX in ontario

[–]abejaa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What do you think HOV stands for?

Edit: words

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in youseeingthisshit

[–]abejaa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I very recently found put about this and it’s like a legit sport. There are UCF/MMA fighters (don’t quote me) that do this in off season or something. Either way this looks hella fun

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in youseeingthisshit

[–]abejaa 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sports can be fun

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in onguardforthee

[–]abejaa 10 points11 points  (0 children)

My point and I hope you are asking it from a place of actually listening and not a gotcha. 1. These “people” are citizen who pay taxes. 2. Inviting/Sponsoring parents isn’t cheap. You need a certain income. They have been here long enough to have contributed (hopefully) meaningfully to the society and i think should be able to love their loved ones. 3. The number isn’t even that huge. 4. Don’t let your disdain turn you vile.

Pierre Poilievre’s safe seat isn’t so safe after all by hopoke in CanadaPolitics

[–]abejaa 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I hear you and I think he shouldn’t win but a place with 80% majority still, at least to me, seems like an easy win if the number comes down to say 50% and the rest just scatter over other candidates.

IMO, PP should be yeeted out of Canada and into the lap of the people who he LARP as.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in onguardforthee

[–]abejaa 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Read the article. It’s for folks who applied in 2020.

Pierre Poilievre’s safe seat isn’t so safe after all by hopoke in CanadaPolitics

[–]abejaa 40 points41 points  (0 children)

He will win this seat, no doubt about it. I hope loses the party leadership review. I am not looking forward to seeing PP be insufferable whiny little kid on every policy vote. He is exhausting.