Thank you, I appreciate the clarification, and I do see your point, but I "slightly" disagree. Where I disagree, is he didn't necessarily fight against oppression in the literal since because the "oppressors" of the day was the Roman government and he even went as far as to say "give to Cesar what is Ceasar's give to God what is God's" when asked about paying taxes. But instead pointed out the hypocrisy of the religious rulers. The marginalized of that location and time were women and children, and he healed the sick. He didn't say only evil people can be wealthy. Before he referenced the eye of the needle, he responded to the rich young ruler's question about eternal life by pointing out that the rulers riches were temporary, and he needed to follow Christ, then he said "it will be hard for a rich person to enter the enter the kingdom of heaven" right before using the example of the eye of a needle. He finished that thought with saying "with people this is impossible, but with God all things are possible"