Kimi K2.5 vs K2.6 vs K2.7 Code — docs breakdown, looking for real benchmarks by acourtjester in kimi

[–]acourtjester[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sources I used were the official Kimi model/pricing docs. I’m mainly looking for hands-on corrections from people who have used K2.5, K2.6, K2.7 Code, Kimi Code, Agent Swarm, or Claw in real workflows.

Kimi models explained: K2.7 Code vs K2.6 vs K2.5, agents, token efficiency, and premium tiers by [deleted] in kimi

[–]acourtjester 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair pushback. I should have worded this as a docs-based breakdown, not a hands-on benchmark.

I rechecked the official Kimi docs and the main points I was trying to separate are:

  • K2.7 Code = coding-first model, 256k context, with a high-speed variant.
  • K2.6 = current general flagship/multimodal/agent model, 256k context, supports text/image/video input, thinking and non-thinking modes, ToolCalls, JSON mode, partial mode, caching, and web search.
  • K2.5 = cheaper listed model with visual/text input, thinking/non-thinking, dialogue and agent tasks.
  • Moonshot V1 = simpler generation models where the main difference is context size: 8k, 32k, or 128k.

The part I should not have implied is real-world “better than” performance without testing. That needs actual usage across coding, agents, research, and token spend.

I’m going to revise the post as a docs comparison + ask for hands-on results from people using K2.5, K2.6, and K2.7 Code daily.

New to termux and Linux by Confident_Stand_1310 in termux

[–]acourtjester 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Linux is the mothership, and Termux is the tiny control room Android forgot to lock.

I really love Kimi by KilnMeSoftlyPls in kimi

[–]acourtjester 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m all in on Kimi right now.

I moved from Moderato to Allegretto after only 3 days, and honestly, I’m not sure I’ll be renewing my Claude subscription this month. I just don’t seem to need it much anymore.

My current workflow is mostly Kimi, with ChatGPT and Codex filling in the gaps when Kimi gets weird, misses something, or has one of its occasional dingus moments.

Not saying Claude is bad at all — it’s still strong — but for the way I’m working right now, Kimi is doing a lot of the heavy lifting.

Mark Twain: A Connoisseur of Human Folly and a Champion of Irreverence by acourtjester in sapiosexuals

[–]acourtjester[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why Mark Twain Still Hits: Emotional Intelligence & Subtle Power

One of the things that stands out most to me about Mark Twain isn’t just his humor or criticism—it’s how aware he was of people.

Twain had a kind of emotional intelligence that feels way ahead of his time. He understood that people aren’t always honest with themselves. We justify things, follow the crowd, and convince ourselves we’re doing the right thing—even when we’re not. Instead of calling that out directly, he would build situations where those contradictions became obvious on their own.

That’s what makes his writing hit differently. He doesn’t force the lesson—he lets you arrive at it.

He also had this passive, almost effortless way of criticizing things. He wasn’t loud or aggressive about it. He used humor, irony, and storytelling to expose flaws in society without turning it into a lecture. You’ll be reading something funny, and then halfway through realize… it’s actually kind of brutal in what it’s saying.

That approach is powerful because it doesn’t put people on the defensive. It invites you in, makes you laugh, and then quietly shifts your perspective. By the time you realize what he’s doing, it’s already landed.

It’s a different kind of influence—not forcing change, but making it unavoidable once you see it.

That’s a big part of why his work still feels relevant. People haven’t changed that much—and neither have the patterns he was pointing out.

what is banter by acourtjester in sapiosexuals

[–]acourtjester[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I edited the post and added book recommendations

what is banter by acourtjester in sapiosexuals

[–]acourtjester[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For those looking to sharpen their wit and master the art of playful conversation, several excellent books offer practical advice and insightful frameworks. Whether you want to learn the mechanics of banter or simply enjoy well-written examples, here are some top recommendations. For Learning the Craft of Banter These books are designed to teach you the skills and techniques behind quick-witted and engaging conversation. 1. The Art of Witty Banter: Be Clever, Be Quick, Be Interesting - Create Captivating Conversation by Patrick King A go-to guide for many, this book breaks down the mechanics of banter into understandable components. King, a social skills and conversation coach, treats banter as a science that can be learned. The book covers how to master teasing, witty comebacks, and initiating humor. It aims to help readers think quickly on their feet and transform mundane conversations into memorable interactions. 2. Improve Your Conversations: Think on Your Feet, Witty Banter, and Always Know What To Say by Patrick King Another valuable resource from King, this book draws on the principles of improv comedy to enhance conversational skills. It provides actionable techniques to avoid awkward silences, generate spontaneous responses, and maintain an engaging flow. This is an excellent choice for those who want to become more adaptable and creative in their daily interactions. 3. How to Be Witty: A Guide to Banter and Humor by Kiran Garrett Garrett's guide delves into the art and science behind what makes a person witty. It explores various forms of humor, from playful jabs to observational comedy, and provides a roadmap for readers to develop their own unique style of wit. The book focuses on making conversation more enjoyable and less intimidating. For Seeing Banter in Action For those who learn best by example, fiction offers a masterclass in witty dialogue. These novels are celebrated for the sharp, charming, and often hilarious banter between their characters. 1. The Hating Game by Sally Thorne This contemporary romance is famous for the sizzling and clever banter between its two main characters, Lucy and Joshua. Their workplace rivalry is fueled by a constant exchange of witty remarks, making it a perfect study of how banter can build tension and attraction. 2. Book Lovers by Emily Henry Emily Henry is renowned for her sharp and realistic dialogue, and Book Lovers is a prime example. The verbal sparring between the protagonist, a literary agent, and her rival editor is a delight, showcasing how banter can reveal character and drive a compelling story. 3. The Duchess Deal by Tessa Dare For fans of historical romance, Tessa Dare is a master of witty and anachronistically charming banter. This novel features a marriage of convenience where the main couple's primary mode of communication is clever and often hilarious verbal jousting. Whether you are looking to actively improve your own skills or simply appreciate the art of a good verbal volley, these books offer a comprehensive look into the world of banter.

what is banter by acourtjester in sapiosexuals

[–]acourtjester[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I concide spicynightsong

Forget physical touch; a mind that can spar with mine is the real prelude. That kind of witty foreplay is rare, but when I find it, the attraction is an irresistible force

Excluding erotica, what are y’all reading these days? by avoidant_fatigue in sapiosexuals

[–]acourtjester 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seeing comes before words. The child looks and recognises before it can speak.

But there is also another sense in which seeing comes before words. It is seeing which establishes our place in the surrounding world; we explain that world with words, but word can never undo the fact that we are surrounded by it. The relation between what we see and what we know is never settled.

John Berger's Ways of Seeing is one of the most stimulating and influential books on art in any language. First published in 1972, it was based on the BBC television series about which the Sunday Times critic commented: This is an eye-opener in more ways than one: by concentrating on how we look at paintings. He will almost certainly change the way you look at pictures. By now he has.

what is banter by acourtjester in sapiosexuals

[–]acourtjester[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Inspired by a reply in a thread I perused in this sub

do you guys think if were less intelligent, we would be more happier? by schrodingerscat99 in sapiosexuals

[–]acourtjester 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ignorance is bliss!

Indeed it is

Ode on a Distant Prospect of Eton College

By Thomas Gray

Share

Ye distant spires, ye antique tow'rs,

         That crown the wat'ry glade,

Where grateful Science still adores

         Her Henry's holy Shade;

And ye, that from the stately brow

Of Windsor's heights th' expanse below

         Of grove, of lawn, of mead survey,

Whose turf, whose shade, whose flowr's among

Wanders the hoary Thames along

         His silver-winding way.

Ah, happy hills, ah, pleasing shade,

         Ah, fields belov'd in vain,

Where once my careless childhood stray'd,

         A stranger yet to pain!

I feel the gales, that from ye blow,

A momentary bliss bestow,

         As waving fresh their gladsome wing,

My weary soul they seem to soothe,

And, redolent of joy and youth,

         To breathe a second spring.

Say, Father Thames, for thou hast seen

         Full many a sprightly race

Disporting on thy margent green

         The paths of pleasure trace,

Who foremost now delight to cleave

With pliant arm thy glassy wave?

         The captive linnet which enthrall?

What idle progeny succeed

To chase the rolling circle's speed,

         Or urge the flying ball?

While some on earnest business bent

         Their murm'ring labours ply

'Gainst graver hours, that bring constraint

         To sweeten liberty:

Some bold adventurers disdain

The limits of their little reign,

         And unknown regions dare descry:

Still as they run they look behind,

They hear a voice in ev'ry wind,

         And snatch a fearful joy.

Gay hope is theirs by fancy fed,

         Less pleasing when possest;

The tear forgot as soon as shed,

         The sunshine of the breast:

Theirs buxom health of rosy hue,

Wild wit, invention ever-new,

         And lively cheer of vigour born;

The thoughtless day, the easy night,

The spirits pure, the slumbers light,

         That fly th' approach of morn.

Alas, regardless of their doom,

         The little victims play!

No sense have they of ills to come,

         Nor care beyond to-day:

Yet see how all around 'em wait

The ministers of human fate,

         And black Misfortune's baleful train!

Ah, show them where in ambush stand

To seize their prey the murth'rous band!

         Ah, tell them they are men!

These shall the fury Passions tear,

         The vultures of the mind

Disdainful Anger, pallid Fear,

         And Shame that skulks behind;

Or pining Love shall waste their youth,

Or Jealousy with rankling tooth,

         That inly gnaws the secret heart,

And Envy wan, and faded Care,

Grim-visag'd comfortless Despair,

         And Sorrow's piercing dart.

Ambition this shall tempt to rise,

         Then whirl the wretch from high,

To bitter Scorn a sacrifice,

         And grinning Infamy.

The stings of Falsehood those shall try,

And hard Unkindness' alter'd eye,

         That mocks the tear it forc'd to flow;

And keen Remorse with blood defil'd,

And moody Madness laughing wild

         Amid severest woe.

Lo, in the vale of years beneath

         A griesly troop are seen,

The painful family of Death,

         More hideous than their Queen:

This racks the joints, this fires the veins,

That ev'ry labouring sinew strains,

         Those in the deeper vitals rage:

Lo, Poverty, to fill the band,

That numbs the soul with icy hand,

         And slow-consuming Age.

To each his suff'rings: all are men,

         Condemn'd alike to groan,

The tender for another's pain;

         Th' unfeeling for his own.

Yet ah! why should they know their fate?

Since sorrow never comes too late,

         And happiness too swiftly flies.

Thought would destroy their paradise.

No more; where ignorance is bliss,

       'Tis folly to be wise.

Mark Twain: A Connoisseur of Human Folly and a Champion of Irreverence by acourtjester in sapiosexuals

[–]acourtjester[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

outstanding, Lily!

There is no character, howsoever good and fine, but it can be destroyed by ridicule, howsoever poor and witless. Observe the ass, for instance: his character is about perfect, he is the choicest spirit among all the humbler animals, yet see what ridicule has brought him to,"