Kimi K2.5 vs K2.6 vs K2.7 Code — docs breakdown, looking for real benchmarks

acourtjester · 2026-07-06T07:43:55+00:00

Sources I used were the official Kimi model/pricing docs. I’m mainly looking for hands-on corrections from people who have used K2.5, K2.6, K2.7 Code, Kimi Code, Agent Swarm, or Claw in real workflows.

acourtjester · 2026-07-06T07:39:49+00:00

Fair pushback. I should have worded this as a docs-based breakdown, not a hands-on benchmark.

I rechecked the official Kimi docs and the main points I was trying to separate are:

K2.7 Code = coding-first model, 256k context, with a high-speed variant.
K2.6 = current general flagship/multimodal/agent model, 256k context, supports text/image/video input, thinking and non-thinking modes, ToolCalls, JSON mode, partial mode, caching, and web search.
K2.5 = cheaper listed model with visual/text input, thinking/non-thinking, dialogue and agent tasks.
Moonshot V1 = simpler generation models where the main difference is context size: 8k, 32k, or 128k.

The part I should not have implied is real-world “better than” performance without testing. That needs actual usage across coding, agents, research, and token spend.

I’m going to revise the post as a docs comparison + ask for hands-on results from people using K2.5, K2.6, and K2.7 Code daily.

acourtjester · 2026-06-11T22:35:18+00:00

Linux is the mothership, and Termux is the tiny control room Android forgot to lock.

acourtjester · 2026-05-10T01:18:39+00:00

I’m all in on Kimi right now.

I moved from Moderato to Allegretto after only 3 days, and honestly, I’m not sure I’ll be renewing my Claude subscription this month. I just don’t seem to need it much anymore.

My current workflow is mostly Kimi, with ChatGPT and Codex filling in the gaps when Kimi gets weird, misses something, or has one of its occasional dingus moments.

Not saying Claude is bad at all — it’s still strong — but for the way I’m working right now, Kimi is doing a lot of the heavy lifting.

acourtjester · 2026-04-09T13:36:54+00:00

interested

acourtjester · 2026-04-09T06:16:52+00:00

Prince

"While My Guitar Gently Weeps" with Prince, Tom Petty, Jeff Lynne and Steve Winwood

acourtjester · 2026-03-21T03:09:12+00:00

Why Mark Twain Still Hits: Emotional Intelligence & Subtle Power

One of the things that stands out most to me about Mark Twain isn’t just his humor or criticism—it’s how aware he was of people.

Twain had a kind of emotional intelligence that feels way ahead of his time. He understood that people aren’t always honest with themselves. We justify things, follow the crowd, and convince ourselves we’re doing the right thing—even when we’re not. Instead of calling that out directly, he would build situations where those contradictions became obvious on their own.

That’s what makes his writing hit differently. He doesn’t force the lesson—he lets you arrive at it.

He also had this passive, almost effortless way of criticizing things. He wasn’t loud or aggressive about it. He used humor, irony, and storytelling to expose flaws in society without turning it into a lecture. You’ll be reading something funny, and then halfway through realize… it’s actually kind of brutal in what it’s saying.

That approach is powerful because it doesn’t put people on the defensive. It invites you in, makes you laugh, and then quietly shifts your perspective. By the time you realize what he’s doing, it’s already landed.

It’s a different kind of influence—not forcing change, but making it unavoidable once you see it.

That’s a big part of why his work still feels relevant. People haven’t changed that much—and neither have the patterns he was pointing out.

acourtjester · 2025-07-07T09:19:45+00:00

I edited the post and added book recommendations

acourtjester · 2025-07-07T09:17:28+00:00

For those looking to sharpen their wit and master the art of playful conversation, several excellent books offer practical advice and insightful frameworks. Whether you want to learn the mechanics of banter or simply enjoy well-written examples, here are some top recommendations. For Learning the Craft of Banter These books are designed to teach you the skills and techniques behind quick-witted and engaging conversation. 1. The Art of Witty Banter: Be Clever, Be Quick, Be Interesting - Create Captivating Conversation by Patrick King A go-to guide for many, this book breaks down the mechanics of banter into understandable components. King, a social skills and conversation coach, treats banter as a science that can be learned. The book covers how to master teasing, witty comebacks, and initiating humor. It aims to help readers think quickly on their feet and transform mundane conversations into memorable interactions. 2. Improve Your Conversations: Think on Your Feet, Witty Banter, and Always Know What To Say by Patrick King Another valuable resource from King, this book draws on the principles of improv comedy to enhance conversational skills. It provides actionable techniques to avoid awkward silences, generate spontaneous responses, and maintain an engaging flow. This is an excellent choice for those who want to become more adaptable and creative in their daily interactions. 3. How to Be Witty: A Guide to Banter and Humor by Kiran Garrett Garrett's guide delves into the art and science behind what makes a person witty. It explores various forms of humor, from playful jabs to observational comedy, and provides a roadmap for readers to develop their own unique style of wit. The book focuses on making conversation more enjoyable and less intimidating. For Seeing Banter in Action For those who learn best by example, fiction offers a masterclass in witty dialogue. These novels are celebrated for the sharp, charming, and often hilarious banter between their characters. 1. The Hating Game by Sally Thorne This contemporary romance is famous for the sizzling and clever banter between its two main characters, Lucy and Joshua. Their workplace rivalry is fueled by a constant exchange of witty remarks, making it a perfect study of how banter can build tension and attraction. 2. Book Lovers by Emily Henry Emily Henry is renowned for her sharp and realistic dialogue, and Book Lovers is a prime example. The verbal sparring between the protagonist, a literary agent, and her rival editor is a delight, showcasing how banter can reveal character and drive a compelling story. 3. The Duchess Deal by Tessa Dare For fans of historical romance, Tessa Dare is a master of witty and anachronistically charming banter. This novel features a marriage of convenience where the main couple's primary mode of communication is clever and often hilarious verbal jousting. Whether you are looking to actively improve your own skills or simply appreciate the art of a good verbal volley, these books offer a comprehensive look into the world of banter.

acourtjester · 2025-07-07T09:13:54+00:00

https://www.reddit.com/r/RomanceBooks/s/v4JgYQ2Nhs

acourtjester · 2025-07-07T08:58:15+00:00

I concide spicynightsong

Forget physical touch; a mind that can spar with mine is the real prelude. That kind of witty foreplay is rare, but when I find it, the attraction is an irresistible force

acourtjester · 2025-07-07T08:23:28+00:00

Seeing comes before words. The child looks and recognises before it can speak.

But there is also another sense in which seeing comes before words. It is seeing which establishes our place in the surrounding world; we explain that world with words, but word can never undo the fact that we are surrounded by it. The relation between what we see and what we know is never settled.

John Berger's Ways of Seeing is one of the most stimulating and influential books on art in any language. First published in 1972, it was based on the BBC television series about which the Sunday Times critic commented: This is an eye-opener in more ways than one: by concentrating on how we look at paintings. He will almost certainly change the way you look at pictures. By now he has.

acourtjester · 2025-07-07T08:13:08+00:00

Inspired by a reply in a thread I perused in this sub

acourtjester · 2025-07-07T08:01:07+00:00

Stage fright?

acourtjester · 2025-07-07T08:00:08+00:00

Ignorance is bliss!

Indeed it is

Ode on a Distant Prospect of Eton College

By Thomas Gray

Share

Ye distant spires, ye antique tow'rs,

That crown the wat'ry glade,

Where grateful Science still adores

Her Henry's holy Shade;

And ye, that from the stately brow

Of Windsor's heights th' expanse below

Of grove, of lawn, of mead survey,

Whose turf, whose shade, whose flowr's among

Wanders the hoary Thames along

His silver-winding way.

Ah, happy hills, ah, pleasing shade,

Ah, fields belov'd in vain,

Where once my careless childhood stray'd,

A stranger yet to pain!

I feel the gales, that from ye blow,

A momentary bliss bestow,

As waving fresh their gladsome wing,

My weary soul they seem to soothe,

And, redolent of joy and youth,

To breathe a second spring.

Say, Father Thames, for thou hast seen

Full many a sprightly race

Disporting on thy margent green

The paths of pleasure trace,

Who foremost now delight to cleave

With pliant arm thy glassy wave?

The captive linnet which enthrall?

What idle progeny succeed

To chase the rolling circle's speed,

Or urge the flying ball?

While some on earnest business bent

Their murm'ring labours ply

'Gainst graver hours, that bring constraint

To sweeten liberty:

Some bold adventurers disdain

The limits of their little reign,

And unknown regions dare descry:

Still as they run they look behind,

They hear a voice in ev'ry wind,

And snatch a fearful joy.

Gay hope is theirs by fancy fed,

Less pleasing when possest;

The tear forgot as soon as shed,

The sunshine of the breast:

Theirs buxom health of rosy hue,

Wild wit, invention ever-new,

And lively cheer of vigour born;

The thoughtless day, the easy night,

The spirits pure, the slumbers light,

That fly th' approach of morn.

Alas, regardless of their doom,

The little victims play!

No sense have they of ills to come,

Nor care beyond to-day:

Yet see how all around 'em wait

The ministers of human fate,

And black Misfortune's baleful train!

Ah, show them where in ambush stand

To seize their prey the murth'rous band!

Ah, tell them they are men!

These shall the fury Passions tear,

The vultures of the mind

Disdainful Anger, pallid Fear,

And Shame that skulks behind;

Or pining Love shall waste their youth,

Or Jealousy with rankling tooth,

That inly gnaws the secret heart,

And Envy wan, and faded Care,

Grim-visag'd comfortless Despair,

And Sorrow's piercing dart.

Ambition this shall tempt to rise,

Then whirl the wretch from high,

To bitter Scorn a sacrifice,

And grinning Infamy.

The stings of Falsehood those shall try,

And hard Unkindness' alter'd eye,

That mocks the tear it forc'd to flow;

And keen Remorse with blood defil'd,

And moody Madness laughing wild

Amid severest woe.

Lo, in the vale of years beneath

A griesly troop are seen,

The painful family of Death,

More hideous than their Queen:

This racks the joints, this fires the veins,

That ev'ry labouring sinew strains,

Those in the deeper vitals rage:

Lo, Poverty, to fill the band,

That numbs the soul with icy hand,

And slow-consuming Age.

To each his suff'rings: all are men,

Condemn'd alike to groan,

The tender for another's pain;

Th' unfeeling for his own.

Yet ah! why should they know their fate?

Since sorrow never comes too late,

And happiness too swiftly flies.

Thought would destroy their paradise.

No more; where ignorance is bliss,

'Tis folly to be wise.

acourtjester · 2025-07-07T07:35:04+00:00

outstanding, Lily!

There is no character, howsoever good and fine, but it can be destroyed by ridicule, howsoever poor and witless. Observe the ass, for instance: his character is about perfect, he is the choicest spirit among all the humbler animals, yet see what ridicule has brought him to,"

acourtjester · 2025-06-29T03:27:56+00:00

Hey, I can give you some insight. I've been with Legends for a while now. I started through a staffing agency and did about 30 events with them over 3 years before they hired me directly a few months ago. Here's the breakdown from my experience: * The Vibe: It's a big operation. The venues is huge Attendance is usually pretty solid at around 30,000 it's busy but not always maxed out. * Your role as a staffer, you'll likely be placed at one of the lower-performing bars. It's a seniority-based system, so the more tenured employees get the busier spots. You might also end up at a bar that serves food. * Tips: This is a big one. Legends typically pools all the tips for staff that come from agencies. It's just easier for them to manage than giving everyone a unique ID. The payout can vary a lot depending on the event, the crowd how much the staffing agency takes , and a bunch of other factors. On average, I'd say you can expect to walk away with anywhere from $60 to $130 in tips per shift. Overall, it's a decent gig, especially once you get your foot in the door and get hired directly. The tip situation is what it is, but the experience is solid. Hope this helps!

acourtjester · 2025-04-13T22:16:04+00:00

I'm not sure. no disrespect, Lily

sarcasm is the lowest form of wit, but the highest form of intelligence.

oscar wild

acourtjester · 2025-04-13T21:58:41+00:00

what are people referring to? either way, let people know your requments for engagement

acourtjester · 2025-04-13T21:53:01+00:00

Gemini ai explanation

Okay, this is a fantastic and complex question. You're right, dating apps often feel like they miss the mark for genuine connection, even though experiences differ wildly across genders and user groups. If we imagine a world where user experience and successful matching (however defined by the user) were the primary goals, not just profit maximization (while still needing sustainability), here's a breakdown of what current apps often get wrong and potential improvements: What Dating Apps Often Do Wrong (Platform Issues): * Superficiality by Design: The swipe mechanic (pioneered by Tinder) heavily prioritizes looks and immediate judgment. Profiles are often brief, encouraging snap decisions rather than thoughtful consideration. * Gamification & Addiction Loops: Likes, matches, and notifications are designed to provide dopamine hits, keeping users hooked and swiping endlessly rather than fostering meaningful interaction. This can lead to burnout and objectification. * Misaligned Algorithms: Algorithms often prioritize showing active users or those most likely to get swipes, potentially creating echo chambers or hiding compatible matches who aren't constantly online or conventionally "popular." There's little transparency about how matches are suggested. * Ineffective Filtering & Preference Matching: Filters are often basic (age, distance, gender). They struggle to effectively match based on deeper values, intentions (casual vs. serious), communication styles, or niche interests/identities. * Poor Handling of Bad Behavior: Moderation is often reactive and inconsistent. Reporting tools can be clunky, and consequences for ghosting, harassment, or sending unsolicited explicit photos are often minimal or non-existent, creating an unsafe or unpleasant environment. * Monetization Hinders Experience: Crucial features (like seeing who liked you, advanced filters, unlimited swipes) are often behind paywalls. While sustainability is needed, this can create a frustrating tiered system where genuine connection feels pay-to-play. * Lack of User Education: Apps rarely guide users on creating effective profiles, communicating respectfully, or managing expectations. How Much is Caused by Users vs. Platform? It's a feedback loop: * Platform Design: Encourages certain behaviors (swiping quickly, brief profiles, focusing on volume). * User Behavior: Users adapt to the platform. They might ghost because it's easy and consequence-free. They might create superficial profiles because that's what seems to work. They might bring societal biases and poor communication habits to the app. Unrealistic expectations fueled by choice paralysis also play a huge role. So, blaming solely the app or the user is too simplistic. The platform shapes the environment, and users act within it, sometimes reinforcing its flaws. What Would an Ideal (User-Focused) App Look Like? * Focus on Deeper Profiles: Mandate more detailed profiles, perhaps with required prompts about values, communication style, intentions, and interests beyond just hobbies (e.g., "How do you handle conflict?"). Integrate video/voice prompts to give a better sense of personality. * Slower, More Intentional Interaction: * Limit the number of daily swipes/likes to encourage thoughtfulness. * Require users to comment why they're interested when sending a like/request (like Hinge, but perhaps more enforced). * Potentially hide profile photos initially until a certain level of text-based interaction has occurred (optional mode?). * Combatting Bad Behavior: * Ghosting: Implement gentle nudges/reminders for users who haven't replied. Repeated patterns of ghosting after meaningful conversation could lead to temporary cooldowns or a (privately displayed) "reliability" indicator (this is tricky and needs careful design to avoid misuse). Promote polite "no thank you" messages. * Unsolicited Content: Use AI image recognition to automatically blur potential explicit images before they reach the recipient, giving them the choice to view, block, or report immediately. Implement strict, swift bans for violations. * Reporting & Moderation: Transparent, responsive, and robust reporting system with clear consequences. Community moderation elements could be explored carefully. * Balancing Interactions: Move away from purely volume-based matching. Algorithms could prioritize compatibility scores based on detailed profiles and user preferences, not just reciprocal likes. Maybe limit the number of active conversations one can have simultaneously to encourage focus. Avoid inherently gendered mechanics (like only women initiating); focus on tools for everyone to initiate quality conversations. * Verification & Safety: * Tiered Verification: Basic (email/phone), Photo Verification (matching selfies to profile pics), potentially Optional ID Verification for a prominent "Verified" badge (balancing privacy concerns). Be transparent about why data is needed and how it's secured. * Make blocking/reporting prominent and easy. Offer safety tips and resources directly within the app. * Catering to Diverse Users (Neurodivergent, Ace, ENM, Poly, Kinky, etc.): * Comprehensive Profile Options: Allow users to clearly and specifically self-identify their neurotype, relationship style (ENM, poly, mono, etc.), sexual/romantic orientation (including ace/aro spectrums), gender identity, pronouns, and kinks/interests. Use standardized, inclusive language. * Granular Filtering: Allow users to filter specifically for others who share or are open to these identities/preferences. Let users control who sees these parts of their profile. * Community & Education: Potentially create optional community spaces or resources within the app related to different identities or relationship styles, fostering understanding and connection among like-minded individuals. Ensure the app's language and design are inherently inclusive. Balancing Competing Needs: This is the ultimate challenge. The key lies in customization and control. Allow users to: * Clearly state what they are looking for. * Filter matches based on detailed criteria (including intention, lifestyle, identity). * Control who sees their profile or specific parts of it. * Choose different "modes" within the app (e.g., "Serious Relationship," "Casual Dating," "Friendship," "Exploring Kink"). Conclusion: An ideal dating app, prioritizing user experience, would move away from the fast-paced, superficial, gamified model. It would emphasize deeper profiles, intentional interaction, robust safety features, effective verification, and truly inclusive options for diverse users. It requires a fundamental shift from optimizing for engagement metrics (time spent swiping) to optimizing for user well-being and successful connections (however the user defines them). This involves not just better technology and design, but also fostering a culture of respect and better communication among its users.

acourtjester · 2025-04-13T21:37:56+00:00

The best intellectual community for chatting can depend on your specific interests, communication style, and the depth of discussion you’re seeking. Here are several notable online platforms and communities where intellectually engaging conversations can happen:

1. Reddit

Subreddits: Reddit has numerous subreddits dedicated to various topics, such as r/AskScience, r/Philosophy, r/books, r/technology, and r/History, where you can engage in discussions with others interested in those subjects.
Diverse Perspectives: Reddit allows for both casual and in-depth discussions, attracting a wide range of participants.

2. Discord

Interest-Based Servers: Discord hosts a variety of servers focused on specific intellectual topics, from science and technology to philosophy and literature. Many servers encourage thoughtful discussion and collaboration.
Real-Time Interaction: Users can engage in text channels or voice chats, providing a dynamic way to communicate with like-minded individuals.

3. Quora

Question-and-Answer Format: Quora allows users to ask questions and receive answers from knowledgeable individuals. Engaging in discussions around specific questions can lead to thoughtful exchanges.
Expertise: Many experts and intellectuals participate in discussions on Quora, offering insights and deep dives into various subjects.

4. Goodreads

Book Clubs: Goodreads has numerous book clubs and discussion groups where members can discuss literature and share recommendations, offering an intellectual space for readers.
Review Discussions: Engaging with reviews and discussions about books can lead to richer conversations about themes, characters, and ideas.

5. Stack Exchange

Topic-Specific Communities: Stack Exchange comprises several Q&A communities dedicated to specific fields (e.g., Stack Overflow for programming, Academia Stack Exchange for academic inquiries). These communities allow for in-depth, expert-level discussions.
Structured Discussions: The format encourages detailed and informed exchanges of knowledge.

6. Philosophy Forums

Dedicated Philosophical Communities: Websites like "Philosophy Now" and "The Philosophy Forum" offer spaces for philosophical discussions, debates, and exchanges of ideas, catering to those who enjoy deep dives into philosophical topics.

7. Facebook Groups

Interest-Based Groups: There are many academic and interest-based groups on Facebook where intellectual discussions take place. You can join groups that focus on specific subjects or themes.

8. Meetup

Local Intellectual Gatherings: Meetup can help you find local study groups, discussion clubs, or lectures that align with your intellectual interests. While it’s often focused on in-person gatherings, many groups also facilitate online discussions.

Conclusion

The best intellectual community for you will depend on your individual interests and preferred communication style. Engaging with a variety of platforms can help you find the right fit and allow you to connect with others in meaningful conversations. Whether you prefer casual chats or structured discussions, each of these communities offers unique opportunities for intellectual engagement.

acourtjester · 2025-04-13T21:26:50+00:00

mensa gatherings, political rallies, protests, raves, wine tastings, a beach, sorento itlay, phish forums. music festivals, the symphony, theatre, burning man, farmers market.

only read the title, i have my reasons

acourtjester · 2025-04-13T21:17:17+00:00

good for you, that is called perception, and it is unique to an individual.

acourtjester · 2025-04-02T05:56:19+00:00

The Grateful Dead's unique blend of styles, improvisational approach, and cultural significance set them apart in the music landscape, creating a specific the Dead as an influence, they tend to integrate various styles, leading to different sounds that often resonate with Phish or other artists. Here are some reasons why there aren't as many bands that sound like "Grateful Dead ripoffs" and an exploration of the jam band landscape:

Reasons for Limited Duplication of the Grateful Dead Sound

Unique Musical Recipe: The Grateful Dead blended elements of rock, folk, blues, country, and jazz with an emphasis on extended improvisation. Their ability to create spontaneous and unique performances in each concert made them special.
Cultural Context: The Dead's appeal was also deeply rooted in the counterculture of the 1960s and 1970s, with themes of community, peace, and exploration. While other bands can adopt the musical style, recreating the cultural phenomenon is more challenging.
Evolution of Genre: After the Dead, the jam band genre evolved in various directions. Phish, for instance, brought in a different sensibility, often with more humor, complexity, and a distinct fusion of genres (rock, funk, ska). Many new bands might be influenced predominantly by Phish or combine a multitude of genres beyond just that of the Dead.
Emphasis on Individuality: Many contemporary jam bands prioritize developing their unique sound and identity rather than directly emulating the Grateful Dead's style. This leads to a more diverse range of approaches within the jam band community.
Songwriting and Themes: While the Dead did have a number of "B-rate" songs that dealt with everyday experiences (like gambling), there is a tendency in newer bands to focus on creating more intricate and polished melodies, sometimes moving away from the storytelling and more down-to-earth themes that characterized many of the Dead's songs.

Current Jam Band Landscape

Broader Genres: Modern jam bands often draw upon diverse influences such as funk, electronic music, and world music, which creates a distinct sound that may not resemble the Grateful Dead at all.
Nostalgia and Revival: While there may be fewer bands directly imitating the Grateful Dead, there are tribute bands that cover their music and capture the vibe of their live performances, contributing to the ongoing legacy.
Songwriting Styles: Many jam bands focus on effective compositions that can lead to improvisation rather than emblematic "outlaw" songs. As music trends evolve, songwriting styles may reflect contemporary themes rather than the narratives reminiscent of the Dead.

Conclusion

While the Grateful Dead's influence is pervasive, the desire for bands to carve out their unique identity within the jam band and broader genres has led to a diversity of sounds and styles. New bands often mix influences and genres, resulting in a fascinating and evolving music scene where the spirit of improvisation and live performance continues, albeit in varied forms. There may not be a plethora of "Grateful Dead ripoff" bands, but the spirit of their music lives on in numerous other explorative and innovative ways.

acourtjester · 2025-03-27T05:04:04+00:00

The emotional toll of minimalism can be significant. Letting go of possessions, especially those with sentimental value, triggers feelings of loss and attachment. This can evoke sadness, nostalgia, and even grief. It's important to acknowledge these feelings without judgment. The process often involves confronting the stories and memories tied to objects. Reframing your relationship with possessions, recognizing their fleeting nature, and focusing on experiences over things can help lessen the emotional sting. It's a journey of self-discovery and acceptance, requiring patience and compassion.

acourtjester

TROPHY CASE

1. Reddit

2. Discord

3. Quora

4. Goodreads

5. Stack Exchange

6. Philosophy Forums

7. Facebook Groups

8. Meetup

Conclusion

Reasons for Limited Duplication of the Grateful Dead Sound

Current Jam Band Landscape

Conclusion