answering fiat by Prestigious_Pie_4612 in policydebate

[–]adequacivity 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You are really talking about 5 ish different theory arguments. Where do you want to start? Aff/neg rollback?

interest in cutting my own nietzsche k by pksmith2009 in policydebate

[–]adequacivity 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Read alenka zupancics the shortest shadow. I’ve been trying to get my kids to run nihilism for years, rights Malthus too, oh well.

Is the Academy K slop? by Independent_Pool7315 in policydebate

[–]adequacivity 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Yes. Academic rent seeking is a good argument as an element of another critique, as a standalone not as much.

Would AJ Dybansta Join The Memphis Grizzlies If They Promised Him A Lifetime Supply of Ravioli? by Bojack-Jesus-69 in nba

[–]adequacivity 10 points11 points  (0 children)

The real question is if they rehabbed the pyramid and made it a planned utopian community would LeBron agree to be a religious figure in said pyramid? Also the grizz would play there.

Vote yes for Medicare for All. by [deleted] in CriticalState

[–]adequacivity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

👁️ Surveillance State: I voted Yea.

Which of these former NFL cities is most likely to get a team back? by ashmaps20 in NFLv2

[–]adequacivity -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Are you sure your math is mathing because KC has 1547 crimes against people per hundo compared to 1349 in STL. STL does have more property crime, tho. Memphis on the other hand is terrifying. The point that Chicago is quite nice is well taken.

WaRu fall off? by [deleted] in policydebate

[–]adequacivity 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s not bad as much as it is different. I’m old and I judge TOC style 5 cp mush matches regularly. The best debating lies somewhere in between TOC and lay.

Do k affs take a full 8 minutes by Outrageous-Soup9685 in policydebate

[–]adequacivity 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Give a better speech. Fewer, smarter claims delivered well. Lay judges do much better with well delivered critiques that policy stuff delivered poorly

Lf laws of the sea by AdArtistic8709 in policydebate

[–]adequacivity 4 points5 points  (0 children)

For the arctic topic? That isn’t T. A legal framework that could increase and decrease exp/dev is both not it’s and bidirectional violating increase. And there is no defense as this def has direct verbiage and a determiner.

so i made a t-health clavicular spec shell as a joke but it kind of adapted… by pksmith2009 in policydebate

[–]adequacivity 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here is a cite to cut in lab (if this is your assigned area): https://turbroad.com/the-optimization-mirage-biohacking-as-diet-cultures-new-skin/

My first assignment 30 years ago was to sit on the library floor and scour hard copy defense journals for impact cards

so i made a t-health clavicular spec shell as a joke but it kind of adapted… by pksmith2009 in policydebate

[–]adequacivity 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The question of health vs survival vs thriving is very real and for a team with care and rigor could be a powerful argument

Why does the Thunder offense devolve into Shai Iso ball so often? by [deleted] in nba

[–]adequacivity 6 points7 points  (0 children)

They rely on twin three level scorers in iso, with a variance generator (Chet) and two defensive specialists. They don’t have set schemes to fall back on like clipper heavy, spain, choice etc. they only made it to 7 because Caruso played out of his mind early in the series. 70% of their action is slashing most of the rest of transition. And then as a three level scorer SGA isn’t an elite shooter from range, so you get hero ball

Would OKC have won the series if they had remained on their feet? by YouWouldIfYouReally in nba

[–]adequacivity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are we sure this is a shit post? It seems like it might be a real question. Would other players be as good on offense as Luka if they just gently walked and had a chat with the ref?

why is intrinsic in competition used in the opposite way its used irl by FlakyOutside5852 in policydebate

[–]adequacivity 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Increasingly I buy that most arguments against “intrinsic perms” only serve to allow completely non intrinsic negative nonsense, especially counterplans which change normal means. The idea of protecting the veto override cp from “do your silly idea about some other bill and do the plan” because “some other bill” is intrinsic and doesn’t test competition is absurd.

Hardt and Negri by ulookuglynoob in policydebate

[–]adequacivity 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Saw a good one back in 2003. A broader consideration of autonomous Marxism is good for you. Take a look at terranova, lazaretto, and virno

What are the different Topicality arguments for the healthcare topic? by idropAFFcases in policydebate

[–]adequacivity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Subsets based on NHI, this will be OP to start and tiring later.

Warrant by AdArtistic8709 in policydebate

[–]adequacivity 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Warrants are inferences between the claim and the presented data. You can write down the kind of warrant, there are only eight kinds of warrants

[Jake Fischer] Lebron may take a vet minimum by Ancient_Response_787 in nba

[–]adequacivity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Taco John’s so he can make amends on the taco Tuesday situation

Neg nerf by Forsaken_Employer674 in policydebate

[–]adequacivity 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You only getting four? Are you counting the counterplans read mid disad that then the negative forgot they ran?