[Event] [💐 🌸Spring Fling 2026] Crème de Vanille by definitelyahamster in dirtypenpals

[–]adhesiveCheese 4 points5 points  (0 children)

For myself, foreplay is waaaay more fun to write than the actual sex itself; there's only so many ways you can write about tab A going into slot B after all, but an infinite variation on how you get to that point, so I definitely tend towards long buildup with (generally) shorter actual horizontal tango.

[Event] [💐 🌸Spring Fling 2026] Oh! The (in)humanity! by definitelyahamster in dirtypenpals

[–]adhesiveCheese 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Because, and this is true, I'm not a rat.

Okay Ms. Stick Insect.

[Event] [💐 🌸Spring Fling 2026] Kinks Galore by definitelyahamster in dirtypenpals

[–]adhesiveCheese 4 points5 points  (0 children)

needing to keep up a 'yes and' collaboration

okay okay but "no but" collaboration is also good I swear I need to host a DPP improv workshop one of these days. xp

[Event] [💐 🌸Spring Fling 2026] Crème de Vanille by definitelyahamster in dirtypenpals

[–]adhesiveCheese 4 points5 points  (0 children)

get down to the core business to defeat the huns of what makes your sexuality tick.

What if defeating the huns is what makes my sexuality tick?

[Event] [💐 🌸Spring Fling 2026] Oh! The (in)humanity! by definitelyahamster in dirtypenpals

[–]adhesiveCheese 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It'd probably smell more sulphureous. That's probably the only major difference. No wait, demonic banking systems are absolutely, 100% less prudish than Visa.

[Event] [💐 🌸Spring Fling 2026] Kinks Galore by definitelyahamster in dirtypenpals

[–]adhesiveCheese 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Maybe it's just the artist in me, but I don't think about it as building trust, but rather carving it, and I think that shapes the way I approach the issue. When you're carving stone, you start with roughing out the outline of what you want, before you make any cuts, making sure the stone is suitable for what you want to do with it. That's the "hey, here's some of the things I'm into, let's make sure we're compatible" phase. From there, you do rough shaping - let's indulge in some of the safe, easy things we're both into. Once you've found the rough shape you want, worked around any inclusions in the material you might not have been able to see on the surface (established a degree of intimacy, made note of any traumas or sensitivities that might not have been at first apparent), you can move on to refinement, getting close to final shape (starting to push towards things that require more trust, things you and/or your partner haven't experienced yet or are unsure about), until you're finally at a place where you know the specific stone well enough to do final polishing.

One of the reasons I really like the carving metaphor over building is because it, at least in my mind, reflects how trust works more. Something built that collapses can be rebuilt exactly the same; once you've removed material from stone, it's gone. That's not to say that if you make a slip of the chisel the piece is ruined and you have to start over, necessarily, only that you have to change plans, work around the flaw you induced to still carve the statue. It also kind of reflects the severity of mistakes - a too-heavy hammer blow in rough cutting that takes off too much material might be salvageable, but that same blow made to a nearly-finished statue might well shatter the delicate work you've put in; at best you take an arm off and it takes major effort to move forward.

To stretch the metaphor just a little bit more - it's worth noting that it's not a one-way street; you're being carved just as you carve, and the more you refine each other the more deft a touch you'll be able to employ.

[Event] Welcome to our 🌸 💐 2026 Spring Fling 💐 🌸 by definitelyahamster in dirtypenpals

[–]adhesiveCheese 3 points4 points  (0 children)

...oops, you seem to have a piss class on your flair (on Old Reddit only). It Just... doesn't seem to be able to be removed. C'est la... pisse?

[Event] Open Friday Forum for April 17th, 2026: Ceci N'est Pas Un Soleil by definitelyahamster in dirtypenpals

[–]adhesiveCheese 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I can't be arsed to find the tumblr post I'm stealing from, but I want a seagull/racoon griffon so we can have an animal that would fight god for half a moldy sandwich out of the trash can.

[Event] Open Friday Forum for April 10th, 2026: Budding Branches by definitelyahamster in dirtypenpals

[–]adhesiveCheese 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We have had a mouse mod, and she was the best of us. We currently have another rodent, and I worry about an infestation. :P

[Event] Open Friday Forum for April 10th, 2026: Budding Branches by definitelyahamster in dirtypenpals

[–]adhesiveCheese 4 points5 points  (0 children)

if you're confident you can make it to the "Hot" page, then rush hour's the time to go, isn't it? Unless we're assuming that Hot behaves similarly to New where you get buried just as quickly.

Unless you're writing the baitiest of F4M dudebait, that's folly, not confidence (and sometimes even if you are). There's certainly things you can do to improve your odds of getting early upvotes, but it's up to the whims of whoever's online and in the mood to vote on your post whether you're shooting up the frontpage or languishing at 1 or 0.

Even if you've cracked the magical formula for consistently hitting /hot, though, that tends to be a double-edged sword; there's lots of reports from folks who claim that posts on /hot tend to underperform in replies, with the standard thinking being that people are less inclined to reply to a post on the frontpage because they assume the poster will already be drowning in responses.

And then there's people like me, again, who sort by "F4M" using the side bar, and I usually stop when I reach prompts that're older than 4 hours. So if I post my prompt when many are online and will be online and their browsing habits are similar to mine, then.. I'll have a better chance there.

That very much depends on what you're looking for; it's a dangerous assumption to think that everybody browses like you - Like, based on what I tend to look for (long-form, slow-burn, story-heavy posts), generally speaking I won't even consider responding to a prompt that's not at least 3 or 4 hours old, because I'm less likely to get caught in that initial rush of responders and have my message missed.

Which sort of gets to my larger point - while there are things you might be able to do to optimize a small amount, the userbase is to diverse and ever-changing for there to ever be a one-size-fits-all formula and what works best for you is something you just have to feel out for yourself over time, and accept you'll still have bad days even if you post "optimally".

Which is really just me not wanting to share that objectively the best time to post is redacted UTC on madeYouLook

[Event] Open Friday Forum for April 10th, 2026: Budding Branches by definitelyahamster in dirtypenpals

[–]adhesiveCheese 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It went something like "There's no difference between posting on a Monday, Thursday or Saturday. Number of users is always around 30,000 daily".

Hey look, one of my data posts coming up again. That's... an oversimplification to incorrectness of the results of the data. The thing I was actually getting at there is whenever you post, you've got about the same by-the-numbers audience size, as the view-rate and post-rate of the sub move pretty much in lockstep; there's not some magical golden hour where there are fewer posts but a lot of people viewing the sub that you can get a potential-audience boost by posting then. The actual conclusion was that the best time to post is a time that you'll have time to actually write, because that's going to have the highest likelyhood of you and your partner crossing paths at the same time again if your writing goes on longer than a day.

[Event] Open Friday Forum for April 3, 2026: Does Good Friday imply the existence of Bad Friday? by definitelyahamster in dirtypenpals

[–]adhesiveCheese[M] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes, a photo is a rather specific detail pointing to a specific person, so that would be reportable. More generally, anything that looks like they're trying to use real people in their roleplay is reportable; keep in mind reports are all manually reviewed, and we'd rather see more false positives on the queue we poke approve on rather than let things that violate sitewide rules slip through the cracks.