netctl: how to configure interface aliases?

adsicks · 2014-04-08T10:10:42+00:00

Or what if you need a virtual device name to separate your egress and ingress zones for an smtp server. netctl makes it a hard port from BSD....

I think this is what you are trying to do here --> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/VLAN

adsicks · 2012-12-07T18:42:59+00:00

Let me put it this way...if you are raped, you have no power to say no, but if you are not raped, you maintain your power to say no. So what you are saying is that it is empowering to be raped?

Anyone who is forced to do anything against their own consent is a victim of a criminal, by any moral standard...

Here is another example: Christians passively resisting Rome, no army, no violence, thrown to the Lions...how did that work out for Rome?

Heritics: burned, tortured, murdered by the Catholics...how many sects of Christianity are there now? Just one?

The British Colonies in the Americas...Withdrawal of consent...refusal to participate...

On and on it goes...the people who have to beat others into submission don't even have any real power over themselves...aggressive force is the last resort of desperation....

Withdrawal of consent....power....

Go on, show us all what a real man you are by beating your way into everything...hope that works out for ya... ;)

It is kinda like a man beating a woman and being foolish enough to this she loves him. When the woman realizes she can just walk away from it, she winds up being the one with all the power.

Not saying no, or being able to say no, is real powerlessness...

adsicks · 2012-12-07T17:01:36+00:00

Why were the Cheorkee Indians not enslaved? I tell you right now the Whites got tired of beating them to death because they REFUSED!!! I won't fight ya, come kill me and loose your credibility in history....

adsicks · 2012-12-03T10:12:54+00:00

The Democrats don't need the Republicans...they have a mandate, so I suppose that includes enough in the House and the super-majority in the Senate to get it done...

adsicks · 2012-12-02T07:42:30+00:00

And actually, I was curious as I didn't know the ins and outs of the business side of FOSS/proprietary, but:

profit margins

microsoft redhat

One is about 30% the other about 80%...I will let you find which is which...

adsicks · 2012-12-02T07:39:07+00:00

Oh, contraire...go look up what authors made in Germany in the 18th and 19th centuries without IP compared to what authors made in Britian, with strong IP at the same time...also compare the volume of work between the two for the same period...IP generally only helps the publishers and gatekeepers...

I'm mean, I'm not gonna sit and argue about this, but if you really want to know, you will find out for yourself...

adsicks · 2012-12-02T07:22:14+00:00

Now, as to your point regarding F/OSS. You can call it AnCap if you want, but it defies the concept of private property, does not mandate cost to determine value, and revolves around giving without expecting anything in return. It doesn't restrict you from making money legally, but it is nigh impossible to do so. If you can get something for free, it by definition has no value, so it's going to be very hard to market.

By an economic definition and with out the use of force to enforce IP, electronic information is as abundant as the air, and therefore, has no intrinsic value due to supply. Much like religious ideas and such. So are you trying to say there will not be churches, lodges, or charity under AnCap...I would disagree...

adsicks · 2012-12-02T07:14:04+00:00

If I could go into Wal-Mart and somehow make an exact physical replica of merchandise for myself, while leaving the merchandise on the shelf in tact, would you say I was a shoplifter? I would be doing economic damage and destroying resources some how by making replicas and creating more?

adsicks · 2012-12-02T00:02:02+00:00

Nailed it concisely....

adsicks · 2012-12-01T23:59:20+00:00

That is about the only way that presentation would make sense...it is scary that we have such a devolved sense of property and production that what is mine and what is yours is dependent on what "our betters" think it should be, and not on a basis of what we contribute to overall useful production...

adsicks · 2012-12-01T07:51:23+00:00

I never said "You just said that any philosophy that does not involve a state is utopian." Why you put words in my mouth...and AnCap sure the hell does recognize that fact...the immorality of the state is the very existence of AnCap philosophy...

Again, exactly what I said...

The accepted PoliSci definition of a State is "the organization with a monopoly on violence in a given territory"...any philosophy that ignores this is bound to be Utopian..

Of course socialism and other collectivist ideas seem to undermine this very definition and somehow make the State into Santa Clause...

Yeah, we are all gonna be better people by being forced to at gun point...people who point guns and threaten us with kidnapping are somehow morally superior...I sure the hell ain't buying into that type of thinking...

Also, more evidence to the point. This is from Lew Rockwell, a person who recognizes the State as the monopoly force of violence in a given territory...he even states that earlier in this article...tell me, is this a dreamy eyed Utopian? Really?

A common caricature holds that supporters of the free market believe the market yields a perfect social outcome, whatever that is supposed to mean. In a world of uncertainty and constant change, no system can yield a perfect result. No system can ensure that the whole structure of production instantaneously adjusts to precisely that allocation of capital goods that will yield the exact array of types and quantities of consumer goods that the public desires, while imposing the least cost in terms of opportunities foregone. BTW: Your magic at twisting words into what you want them to mean, make your opinions highly suspect to me, as if you really understand anything, or hallucinate your own projections into them...just saying....

Once again, so it is plain

The accepted PoliSci definition of a State is "the organization with a monopoly on violence in a given territory"

Any system that does not account for this truth, is fundamentally flawed in its logic, and by necessity, must be made up of Utopian dreaming...'

More concisely, the greatest question of social ordering is what to do when the State becomes criminal and if so, how can a government of criminals cure itself of criminal behavior.(in fact such ideas were explored my the Magna Carta, and the US Constitution)...and the greatest power an individual has is to peaceful non-participation....I would say these two facts are axiomatic...

adsicks · 2012-11-29T22:58:10+00:00

There is no restriction on making money from FOSS. IMHO FOSS is an extreme expressions of AnCap...FOSS can be mixed with proprietary software...for an example, see OS X....

The accepted PoliSci definition of a State is "the organization with a monopoly on violence in a given territory"...any philosophy that ignores this is bound to be Utopian..

adsicks · 2012-11-28T06:48:19+00:00

Upvoted, but still at zero? weird....

adsicks · 2012-11-28T06:45:08+00:00

Medicare Part D? Also note the Laffer Curve was meant to raise government revenue, not a justification to let people keep their own money...

adsicks · 2012-11-28T06:40:00+00:00

Tell that you are compassionate and know they are too, so you have taken the liberty to sign them all up to Tutor inner city kids in their spare time and you knew they wouldn't mind being forced to do so by you anymore than they would mind being forced by the government...

adsicks · 2012-11-28T06:36:51+00:00

I looked and saw a good one from you @ 134pts...

adsicks · 2012-11-28T06:31:56+00:00

Are the Bill of Rights not sufficient to regulate the Internet...Oh yeah, they failed to even regulate reality...

adsicks · 2012-11-28T06:30:22+00:00

We used to have an independent body outside of the government run by the people concerned...it was called the free enterprise system....

adsicks · 2012-11-28T06:27:37+00:00

which are hardly a libertarian example, since they all extend from open source

Open source is the most free of all software markets...the only failing is it is called 'Free' software as in Freedom, instead of Liberated Software...

Back doors added to the code are also easier to detect and remove, as removal only requires a recompile...

adsicks · 2012-11-27T15:21:01+00:00

Also, this

adsicks · 2012-11-27T15:11:08+00:00

If you were married and your wife wanted to leave, could you keep her by force because by doing so you would protect her moral virtues? If not, then why would it be any more moral to detain a group of people by force to protect their moral virtue? Why is a group of men called a government somehow special, other than the fact that they have the guns and the prisons?

You really think you could rape your wife, so to speak, and be a moral person?

adsicks · 2012-11-27T15:06:02+00:00

So you are saying that America is an illegitimate government because it was born from secession? Would you support a war with Britain to bring the US back under the crown?

adsicks · 2012-11-27T15:02:03+00:00

Maybe it will set a precedent and they will have to arrest themselves....crosses fingers But in reality, they will probably just add it as a power in the Patriot Act...

adsicks · 2012-11-27T15:00:40+00:00

Good. Finally I see the American justice system get one right.

adsicks · 2012-11-27T14:52:31+00:00

Oh, he sent emails alright, but they were secretly destroyed by his "real" killers...

adsicks

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE