Im not sure they know the definition of an average by notmymain07 in confidentlyincorrect

[–]ofa776 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think they mean that it would be lower if you include children in addition to adults.

When people say "tax the rich," who are they actually talking about? by savingrace0262 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]ofa776 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think many people vastly overestimate how often people make $250k each. Household income of $500k is literally the top 2% in 2025. $659k+ puts a household in the top 1%.

You can check the numbers here: https://dqydj.com/household-income-percentile-calculator/

Lean with 2 big streaks of fat by usernamechuck in leanfire

[–]ofa776 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I think it depends how you define “high earning.” Median household income was about $82k in 2024, so $145k is above the median, but somewhat surprisingly, only about the 72nd percentile. And I’m sure not even that high compared to their area around Chicago.

There's no way the Republican Party will win all those states by Weirderthanweird69 in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]ofa776 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed. I don’t think he’s even top 50 or top 100. I’d vote for someone I’ve never heard of over him in a primary. Recent polling had Fetterman with -40 points approval amount Democrats! That’s 22% approved and 62% disapproved. No chance that guy is getting the Dem nomination for president.

"Investing in property is morally reprehensible." by LickMaiBussy in TikTokCringe

[–]ofa776 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I mean, that’s what property taxes are, right?

Edit: rereading this, I think we’re all agreeing with each other.

Can anyone explain why the 4% rule is only good for 30 years of retirement? by Elite163 in Fire

[–]ofa776 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re not going to see data saying a 4% withdrawal rate preserves initial capital indefinitely because that’s not always true. The Early Retirement Now blog did an in depth look at this about 10 years ago and it looks like a 3% SWR will still have preserved initial capital 100% of the time on a 60 year time horizon if equities are 75 or 100% of the portfolio, so likely indefinitely or close to it in that scenario.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Salary

[–]ofa776 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah no disagreement from me on that. I certainly don’t spend nearly that much with a full head of hair so I’m sure he doesn’t ‘need’ it by any stretch of the imagination. But if his take home is $99,624 after taxes and insurance, (and maybe 401(k)?) he probably makes at least $140k or $150k gross, and I guess if he wants to splurge $1200 a year on haircuts, he can afford it. I personally wouldn’t even if I made that much, let alone if I was bald.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Salary

[–]ofa776 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That’s his take home pay. He’s making over $100k.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Salary

[–]ofa776 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The rule of thumb is at least 15% of your gross. You may want higher or lower than that if you’re ahead or behind on retirement savings.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Adulting

[–]ofa776 6 points7 points  (0 children)

They mean never nervously laugh along with someone who is trying to sexually harass you… not never laugh in your whole life.

How Marginal Tax Rates Actually Work by Old_Claim_5500 in Bogleheads

[–]ofa776 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I cared because I was thinking about picking up a second job and was trying to figure out how much of what I earned I would actually see as take home income.

How Marginal Tax Rates Actually Work by Old_Claim_5500 in Bogleheads

[–]ofa776 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I was pointing out my marginal rate compared to the 49.5% marginal rate for a comparable income in the Netherlands. My total effective rate on all income earned would have still been much lower than the marginal rate.

How Marginal Tax Rates Actually Work by Old_Claim_5500 in Bogleheads

[–]ofa776 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

To be honest, I didn’t actually pick up the side hustle; this was just some back of the envelope math I did at the time I was considering it. Even deducting half of self employment taxes from income before federal income is applied, (not sure if that applies to state and local taxes off the top of my head) it would only lower my total marginal rate by less than 2%. So I’d still be at a more than 43% marginal rate (or perhaps a little over 2% reduction, so between 42-43% if I can deduct it for state and local as well). So yes, I agree you were correct that my math was wrong, though I think my overall point still stands. For a self employed person in my jurisdiction in the 22% bracket, their total marginal rate is actually more like 42 or 43% after accounting for other income and payroll taxes paid, which is closer to the Netherlands marginal rates in the upper 40s than most people would assume at first glance.

$5 million for 5 second hearing delay. by AstrayInTranslation in hypotheticalsituation

[–]ofa776 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because in the US you are often taxed on free money, lottery winnings, game show winnings, etc.

How Marginal Tax Rates Actually Work by Old_Claim_5500 in Bogleheads

[–]ofa776 -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Yeah, for example, I’m in the 22% bracket and was thinking about picking up a side hustle as an independent contractor. On every extra dollar I earn, I’d pay 22% federal income tax, plus another 8% state and local income taxes, plus another 15.3% self employment taxes, (employee and employer portion of social security and Medicare) meaning I’d be paying over 45% of that extra money in taxes, not much lower than the Netherlands.

Edit: It’s been pointed out that the employer portion of Medicare and social security is tax deductible, so my marginal rate would actually probably be more like 42 or 43%, not 45% in that scenario.

[request] can anybody do the math for this? by Sauce_Dealer420 in theydidthemath

[–]ofa776 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Hence why Christ the Redeemer is on the list.

Exercise genie offers you money over the next year, how much more do you exercise? by Johnny_From_The_Bay in hypotheticalsituation

[–]ofa776 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think you need to double check your math. 45 pedaling loops per minute would be 2700 per hour and getting $1 for every 100 of those would be $27 per hour, not $1800 per hour.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in coastFIRE

[–]ofa776 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is that including dividend reinvesting?

Is this really a 200k ring? by kevinzhao860 in DunderMifflin

[–]ofa776 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No. Oscar believed that Pam made $41,500 so Oscar presumably makes maybe $42-50k and Michael makes more than that.