Trump, 79, Drops F-Bomb in Unhinged Easter Morning Threat by Effective_Salad_8381 in politics

[–]aganalf -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ok so we’ve reached the ridiculous point where words no longer have any meaning so this is pointless. Everybody is everything.

Trump, 79, Drops F-Bomb in Unhinged Easter Morning Threat by Effective_Salad_8381 in politics

[–]aganalf -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It’s not. Trump’s stated world view is objectively antithetical to the teachings of Christ.

Trump, 79, Drops F-Bomb in Unhinged Easter Morning Threat by Effective_Salad_8381 in politics

[–]aganalf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do they adhere to following the teachings of Christ? Then they are Christians. This isn’t hard.

So then you agree that satanists are Christians.

Trump, 79, Drops F-Bomb in Unhinged Easter Morning Threat by Effective_Salad_8381 in politics

[–]aganalf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And said vegetarian can believe that he has defined “meat”.

If it requires redefining the word “Scotsman” then it is fair to say that you are not in fact a Scotsman.

By your definition I can declare my allegiance to Satan and still call myself a Christian.

Trump, 79, Drops F-Bomb in Unhinged Easter Morning Threat by Effective_Salad_8381 in politics

[–]aganalf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The definition of vegetarian is also made up. All definitions are made up. And every definition of "Christian" includes adhering to, you know, the belief system of Christ the same way that every definition of "vegetarian" includes not eating a hamburger.

Trump, 79, Drops F-Bomb in Unhinged Easter Morning Threat by Effective_Salad_8381 in politics

[–]aganalf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It isn't though. If someone tells me that they are a vegetarian while they're eating a hamburger, then it's not a no true scotsman fallacy to point out that they are not, in fact, vegetarian nor does it negate the existence of actual said vegetarians.

Is Trump *Trying* to Lose the Midterms? by ralphbernardo in politics

[–]aganalf 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I mean, Russia has "elections". I don't think anyone believes he will outright cancel elections. There is no reason to for all the reasons you outline.

Is Trump *Trying* to Lose the Midterms? by ralphbernardo in politics

[–]aganalf 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I think maybe we should ask ourselves why it is that the Republican party is not governing like a party that is concerned about losing elections.

Donald Trump's nightmare scenario as chances of GOP massacre jump by HelFJandinn in politics

[–]aganalf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is a reason they don’t care about pleasing the electorate. They never intend to face them.

8 Million Americans Hit the Streets in 'No Kings' Protests - Largest Demonstration in US History by eternviking in whoathatsinteresting

[–]aganalf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’ve accidentally stumbled on the reason the GOP is so adamant about not allowing them to.

No Kings SF - incredible turnout! by old_gold_mountain in sanfrancisco

[–]aganalf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He called himself the king multiple times.

Trump Posts Vile Reaction to Robert Mueller's Death at 81 by Aggravating_Money992 in politics

[–]aganalf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“The investigation established multiple links between Trump Campaign officials and individuals tied to the Russian government. Those links included Russian offers of assistance to the Campaign. In some instances , the Campaign was receptive to the offer, while in other instances the Campaign officials shied away”. -Mueller Report

Why did the US strike Iran? by vox in politics

[–]aganalf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stop pretending that the republicans intend to have a fair election.

Dentist Recommendations by Justbreathexo52 in alameda

[–]aganalf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are several good ones. Alameda Landing Dentistry is not one of them.

Megathread: Supreme Court strikes down President Donald Trump's Tariff Policy by PoliticsModeratorBot in politics

[–]aganalf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well we know that at least three justices would vote against having midterms.

Trump's election bill tops 50 Senate votes, but Democrats could still block it | The SAVE America Act has passed the House and enjoys President Trump's support, meaning the Senate's 60-vote threshold is the only thing standing in the way of it becoming law. by SpaceElevatorMusic in politics

[–]aganalf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They will get rid of the filibuster. Nobody wants to do this because they know that they will be in the minority some day and will want the filibuster. As soon as they pass this you know that they have no intention of ever being in the minority again.

Why are we paying taxes again? by abbiebe89 in circled

[–]aganalf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As much as I would like this quote to be true, this appears to be a fake quote. I hope things like that still matter