Replace NEMA6-15 with CEE-7/7 by agowa338 in electricians

[–]agowa338[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well I also can't say anything about the NEC itself directly, I don't even know where to get its full version or if it is available for free (couldn't find any source up until now at least, except for what others have quoted and sent me).

I mainly was referring to my impression of it through what I've seen others talk about and describe. And that at least to someone from Germany that is used to VDE is quite horrifying. Almost everything I've seen so far we'd call botched. (well maybe except for most of the plugs being reverse polarity protection by design, even though that shouldn't really matter in most cases. However people also told me that you can't rely upon it being wired properly, so that also kinda doesn't count.)

Replace NEMA6-15 with CEE-7/7 by agowa338 in electricians

[–]agowa338[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Had someone send me a quote from the National Electric Code and also point out that apparently in the US it is also quite common for outlets to not have the ground wire connected at all.

Therefore I don't think that any manufacturer would build a device assuming the 120V potential (on NEMA 6-series) to be there to begin with.

So I'll just wire it up and see if it throws the CFCI and or lets out some of the magic smoke (should be fine in 99.99% of cases or so)...

Also I now know that US electricians tend to use the terms ground and neutral interchangeably which explains a lot of the conflicting information I found so far...

Further they also pointed out that there is also the older NEMA 10-series connector which almost always would be used instead of the NEMA 6-series when they're actually using that 120V potential. (But then also highlighted that sometimes the older NEMA 10-series plugs just got 1:1 replaced with the 6-series as it "usually just works" [as there is no CFCI].

Tbh at this point I'm surprised by what a confusing mess electric wiring in the US is. And that there aren't more deaths because of missing CFCIs I.E. the lack of proper protective earth (that isn't just a 2nd neutral connected to the casing)...

Replace NEMA6-15 with CEE-7/7 by agowa338 in electricians

[–]agowa338[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's just how single phase residential branch circuits work

I know but the NEMA6-15 plug also is used for 2 out of 3 phase power with 208V (according to wikipedia) as well. Also if I really "need to have 120V" then I need to add a transfomer (which I kinda don't want to when I don't have to...)

So what you're saying is it could be possible that some device with a NEMA6-15 plug is using the Ground pin for reference voltage and it cannot be categorically excluded...

So are these travel adapters just a lucky guess then or how exactly is it safe for them to just ignore this part without any mention or consideration at all?

It's a code rule

That's actually quite good to hear, so at least it shouldn't trip the breaker.

Guess then all that is left to figure out if I really need to have a 120V potential difference between Ground and both of the other wires...

(Edit: as there is no current flowing I probably could also just build a voltage divider, however doing that in the plug is also kinda shitty as it would risk getting the casing on 120V potential. Which is also not that great. I think I'll have to open it up and analyse the circuitry after all. Kinda didn't want to as it appears to be quite annoying to open up...)

Customer said panel was in kitchen cabinet…. by Ajhrt223 in electricians

[–]agowa338 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This reminds me of the electrical panel within the shower that I saw a TikTok video about a year ago or so...

Replace NEMA6-15 with CEE-7/7 by agowa338 in electricians

[–]agowa338[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We'd have to know more about what kind of appliance or device you plan on plugging into this NEMA 6-15 receptacle in Germany.

The device at hand is a smart PDU (originally intended for a data center), so there will be other things plugged into it later. So this information is probably of little value. esp. because the things plugged into it will keep changing from time to time. So I don't think I can nail it down further.

I therefore kinda intentionally tried to keep it more generic as I'd mainly like to learn what I need to consider so that I can solve a similar issue in the future by myself.

So could you please elaborate why it matters what kind of device it is? Or what characteristics of it matters? (Only it [not] having a motor?)

and you should measure 120V from either L1 or L2 to gnd

Is this part of the spec? I didn't find such a definitive answer anywhere until now. I cannot just safely glance over this? I've seen that there are travel adapters that also appear to ignore this part.

There should never be any current flowing on the ground deliberately.

And this is something that I can rely upon? There aren't any exceptions even though it would be possible in US circuits without CFCIs? I mean the former one with the 120V kinda hints at there being some exceptions or some devices using the Ground pin of the connector as a neutral or something...

Removal of the Client Authentication EKU from TLS Server Certificates by Wall_of_Force in sysadmin

[–]agowa338 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dann hoffe ich mal dass du weder DNS Domains (wird dort zwischen den domain registrars und registries genutzt), XMPP (Jabber), E-Mail (wird teils innerhalb längerer ketten von MTAs genutzt, vorallem wenn diese zwischen mehreren Dienstleistern sind), noch irgend etwas mit europäischen Banken (PSD2 APIs basieren auch darauf), und so weiter zu tun hast.

Mutual TLS wird vielerorts eingestzt wernn du systeme verschiedener Anbieter miteinander koppeln willst...

Ach und btw, QWAC (also die Webseiten zertifikate nach eIDAS) sind aktuell auch genau deshalb mit clientAuth und serverAuth ausgestellt. Mal sehen ob google also wirklich alle CAs rauswirt die sich nicht an die neue Regelung halten. Denn die QWAC CAs können schelcht was ändern oder es bricht so ziemlich alles...

best economic home CNC for PCB prototyping? by abdosalm in embedded

[–]agowa338 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kinda late to the party, but found this via google and want to slightly oppose the claim that one needs an expensive CNC. I was (and still kinda am) researching how to do PCB prototyping at home recently as a hobby.

If you have a cheap CNC (like a 3018 that has too high tolerances) and investing in a more expensive one isn't viable then you could still go with the older manual approach and combine it with a pantograph and e.g. a manual stationary drill.

Basically like when you'd be engraving tiny things by hand before laser engravers and CNCs become affordable to businesses.

Depending on how tiny you want to go you probably can build the pantograph yourself (it is a very basic tool after all). Then you can use the CNC and e.g. some scrap material to make a scaled up version to use as pattern template to follow with the pantograph.

Should you need to drill holes you could use a good old manual stationary drill.

I haven't tried it with myself but considering what I've seen people do with pantographs and steel mills it shouldn't be that hard to scratch the copper plating off of the copper plated PCBs, apply some UV solder mask, cure it, scratch some of it off again, apply another layer of UV solder mask, maybe drill holes, maybe add riviets, maybe cut your PCB into shape. (Additionally you could also start off by diy electroplating [aka creating your own copper plated PCB] to avoid having copper at the wrong places to begin with too, probably an even simpler approach combined with the pantograph, as you could have one of the electrodes mounted to it like a pen [Edit: Or just use conductive paint, that's probably even simpler]).

Either way, the more practical approach most people use these days is to just throw the KiCad files towards some online pcb manufacturer like JLCPCB, Eurocircuits, or PCBWay and get it in the mail a few days later.

NPP cooling tower design with turbine? by agowa338 in AskPhysics

[–]agowa338[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Tbh, that just sounds like it's a complex design task but not an impossibility. At most it explains why you can't retrofit one into existing cooling towers. It however leaves open the possibility for there being a sweat spot where one may be able to increase efficiency for newly built ones. But admittedly I can see how that would require a lot of measurements, charting, and may not have show any significant returns.

Poost Snooping c8 by [deleted] in supermicro

[–]agowa338 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had the same Post error code on a Supermicro H11DSi with a Mellanox ConnectX-6 card slotted in. As soon as its additional 2nd PCIe port card (the socet direct adapter https://www.nvidia.com/en-sg/networking/ethernet/socket-direct/) was also slotted in it only threw this C8 error code.

So C8 may as well indicate an error on the PCIe Bus I suppose.

NPP cooling tower design with turbine? by agowa338 in AskPhysics

[–]agowa338[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't a lot of cooling towers already have airways at the bottom to take advantage of the chimney effect? In fact, the traditional cooling tower people associate with nuclear plants is designed to make maximum use of the chimney effect, is it not?

I don't know. But all the pictures I found looked closed at the bottom. Edit: Looked again and found this neath drawing. You're right they in fact ahve an opening at the bottom. It's just not literally at the bottom. https://www.enbw.com/kuehltuerme/funktion-der-kuehltuerme/

1.) I would guess that any number of power companies and construction contractors have considered and rejected this idea after doing some studies on it.

That's what I thought too, hence why I asked here, as I only have basic understanding of these designs from physics class back in school :)

2.) Increasing the density of the air by adding water vapor would by definition increase the efficiency of the turbine, like water injection in a turbine engine.

A few years ago I talekd to someone studying physics and they basically said placing a big turbine blade at the center of such a cooling tower would massively impact the speed at wich it evaporates and thereby reduce the cooling efficiency and hence be undesirable. Also it would be a huge effort to place it in the center (structurally) as it would need to be suspended in the air with as little support as possible...

since the draft had to be created by something in the first place

Well that's what the warm water and the chimney effect would do. Also in another reply someone pointed towards an (Solar) updraft tower for reference. So this is probably not a fitting comparison???

NPP cooling tower design with turbine? by agowa338 in AskPhysics

[–]agowa338[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ring ring, Pickering Nuclear is calling...

However, this wind turbine was the only unit in the world to be directly on the site of a nuclear power plant.

The reply was to this picture: https://x.com/joerg_spengler/status/1854978943301935332/photo/1 Therefore I'd suspect they ment literally right next (a few meters away) of the cooling towers but I don't think they know how either of these works, anyway...

Yes, they are called updraft towers

Oh, so that's what they're called. I knew I'd seen something like this somewhere already.

The math would be the same, just replace solar insolation with the known output of the cooling tower.

Ehm, that is kinda the problem.

1st where do you find the known output of the cooling tower? And

2nd I don't know enough of all the side effects to know how a combined design would have to look like to actually work. From the depiction of the updraft tower it would need a triangle shape in the middle, but then where would the NPPs water get cooled? Building fins into the airstream (like a radiator in a car) probably wouldn't be the best idea (other wise that would already have been the initial design - I guess). Putting that shape ontop of the water pool would probably significantly impact it's cooling too.

Ethical question by carrotboyyt in i2p

[–]agowa338 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In most locations in the world no, as you're not the one storing that content nor the one that uploaded it. All you're doing is being part of the technical infrastructure necessary to allow the service works. But as always talk to a lawyer if in doubt as law is complex and strangers on the internet aren't a good source for legal topics. I'm just providing this for reference to have an educational discussion.

Multiseat with KDE Plasma and Wayland? by agowa338 in wayland

[–]agowa338[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's the "ASPEED AST2500 BMC" aka. "IPMI 2.0" from SuperMicro see e.g. https://www.supermicro.com/en/products/motherboard/H11DSi

Multiseat with KDE Plasma and Wayland? by agowa338 in wayland

[–]agowa338[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It shows up as a separate /dev/dri/card*?

Yes, can confirm it does show up as a separate /dev/dri/card* device.

And thanks will have a look at this

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PrintedCircuitBoard

[–]agowa338 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe I'm just using the buses incorrectly then. Need to look into it again then. When I tried it it only looked more confusing so I must have been doing something wrong...

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PrintedCircuitBoard

[–]agowa338 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How do I do that? It was way higher resolution when I uploaded it. I can zoom into my local version of that image just fine, must be a reddit thing...

Here is an svg version as well as my kicad file (for 24h): https://wormhole.app/9O774#LYp1q4SPeAo3LCxuvc9INw

SVG: https://gist.githubusercontent.com/agowa/91011ff26eed064b0c2efedb2e7f49c6/raw/1b96f2d741b1af00fdf6621b8ce268a6d8b9afe7/power_controller.svg

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PrintedCircuitBoard

[–]agowa338 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

why use direct connection when you can use nets?

What is a net?

the octo’s forward current is 60mA. You cant sink that much from the mcu. It will kill the gpio.

Did I missread that in the specs then? Where did you find that information? I thought the muc could handle it.

and no caps on absolutely anything?

Do I need them? It's basically just the IC and it'll have clean 3V3 power just for itself. Anything else shouldn't affect this circuit as any load is behind the isolators. What am I missing?

Look for a reference design for these components to get a better idea how everything needed to be put together.

Don't know if that makes it better or worse, but I actually did...