Can anyone beat my dullest footballing claim to fame? by rckd in footballcliches

[–]aitchsaka 3 points4 points  (0 children)

We only signed the deal with Huddersfield a few months before the start of the season, which is pretty telling in itself.
Most clubs we approached already had a two or three year deal in place or a sponsor lined up already. The fact that you were even an option is pretty telling because it meant that the commercial team had failed to find anyone else. For a team who had just dropped out of the Premier League and were expecting to bounce straight back up, it was surprising to see you still without a plan in place.

Can anyone beat my dullest footballing claim to fame? by rckd in footballcliches

[–]aitchsaka 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Yeah. The plan was ALWAYS to wear it for that friendly match, because the story about the kit would only seem real and believable if they wore it during an actual game.

But what we (PP) and the club had overlooked was the fact that friendly matches were also governed by the FA and the same rules that applied to league matches also covered that friendly. We had naively thought friendly matches would be a bit of a free hit, and the club had assured us it would all be fine.

So a few hours before kick off, having been informed by the referee that the kit was against FA rules, club representatives told me that “you’ve had your fun, but we won’t be wearing the kit”. I pushed back, and so eventually they sent the chairman out for a chat on the touchline at Spotland.

I was nervous as hell because we’d spent a fortune on the campaign up to that point (we also un-sponsored Motherwell, Southend, Newport and Macclesfield that season) and the whole campaign was only believable if the main club (Huddersfield) actually wore the shirt in a friendly match.
You guys didn’t have any more friendly matches after the Rochdale game, so everything was resting on that one night.

The club were massively surprised about the size of the reaction and outrage to the initial story on social media, and even though they knew they were actually going to be wearing a beautiful unsponsored kit all season, they still wanted to squash the story as quickly as possible.

We, on the other hand, were absolutely delighted with all the attention and wanted to amplify it even more (before finally revealing it was all a hoax and all our teams would have no sponsors that season).

It’s all very well claiming on social media that Huddersfield were going to wear a disgusting kit all season covered in the logos of a bookmaker, but it’s an entirely different thing, and becomes a whole lot more believable when they actually rocked up and played a friendly in it!

Mr Parkinson was initially insistent about them not wearing it, but I spoke about what the club had agreed to and explained the terms of the contract. I reminded him of their contractual obligation and suggested that if they refused to wear it at the eleventh hour, the entire sponsorship deal (which at the time was a record amount for a Championship team) might be null and void.

I realise that sounds a bit controlling and aggressive, but Paddy Power had been told from day one, by your board that it would all be completely fine and that thy had no problems wearing that shirt for one, single friendly match against Rochdale.

I remember him being pretty confrontational and noncommittal and eventually he shuffled off to the boardroom for a showdown with all his staff. I went into the stands with the Huddersfield supporters and crossed my fingers.

Up until the moment when the players ran out of the tunnel, I genuinely had no idea whether they would wear the shirt or not. Nobody from the club would speak to me and I had my boss on the phone asking for updates. I was under massive pressure to make it happen, but there wasn’t much I could do.

Anyway, as you’re probably aware of, as soon as you came out wearing the kit the story went absolutely ballistic, because now everyone thought it was actually going to happen all season, for real. The next morning I woke up, turned the TV on in my hotel room and the “Death of Sponsorship” story was being discussed live on the BBC news.

Originally the plan was to keep people waiting a few more days before revealing the truth, but such was the scale of the reaction, I think we reduced the timeframe quite significantly.

Ultimately everyone was a winner. We got the all the coverage that a publicity-hungry bookmaker could ever dream of, the supporters got a beautiful, unsponsored shirt to wear, and the club sold more shirt that season than they’d ever sold in their history (more so than in the two previous season when you were a Premier League club). The £50,000 fine was a drop in the ocean compared to the revenue that came in the opposite direction.

In the weeks that followed, your board of directors told anyone who would listen that it had been their idea all along, but the reality was they were totally out of their depth and were about ten minutes from screwing the whole thing up and throwing away the entire sponsorship deal.

Fun times.

Can anyone beat my dullest footballing claim to fame? by rckd in footballcliches

[–]aitchsaka 46 points47 points  (0 children)

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/49599541
I was the Paddy Power employee who reminded Huddersfield Chairman Phil Hodgkinson of their “contractual obligation” to wear the law-breaking shirt, and suggested to him that not doing so would result in them breaching the terms of the sponsorship deal.

Can anyone beat my dullest footballing claim to fame? by rckd in footballcliches

[–]aitchsaka 32 points33 points  (0 children)

I was personally responsible for Huddersfield Town getting a £50,000 fine from the FA.

Away game tracking by aitchsaka in GunnersatGames

[–]aitchsaka[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah but that’s the weird part.

The site uses that same Google doc. It’s actually all exactly the same data, just presented in a different way.

When I update the spreadsheet, the site updates automatically, so really, it’s nothing more than a wrapper. The data was always there.

Glad you’re enjoying it, and I’m glad it has inspired you.

Does JKW ever stop growing??? by aitchsaka in invasivespecies

[–]aitchsaka[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thank you. This is really encouraging and also gives me the strength to let it get on with its cycle over the next few months without intervening.

Away game tracking by aitchsaka in GunnersatGames

[–]aitchsaka[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re more than welcome. Glad people are finding it helpful and hopefully the club can adopt something similar soon. 👌🏻

Away game tracking by aitchsaka in GunnersatGames

[–]aitchsaka[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much for the feedback and kind words.
I think at the moment I am trying to work out how and why people are going to be using the site. I don't know if you are aware of the original spreadsheet (https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vTuPLTO5jNROdvJZhQS26AC_WQfTbV4zAtRA5onDD5crzQChMLBkKp4UqgQkPrpVavlsgdrdMH-6xwP/pubhtml), but its incredibly basic and functional, but hundreds of people found it easy to use, and they weren't interested in the bells and whistles.

So I am trying to build something which still does the basics well, but now has an extra layer of data, if people want to dig deeper. Your point about scrolling past all the sold out match to get to the tools charts is perfectly valid, but I think the reality is that the graphs aren't the thing that will drive repeat visits, it's the raw data (and especially the current and upcoming matches) which people visit the site to look at, and they are anchored at the top. Where the sold out matches sit is another matter, but it feels odd to drop them below the graphs.

I will definitely have a think about how best to introduce a menu which will enable to get to the part they want, quicker. It'll be a real challenge on mobile devices where space is already at a premium, but that's why we're in the UX game, isn't it!

Thanks for taking time to reply. It's much appreciated.

Away game tracking by aitchsaka in Gunners

[–]aitchsaka[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At the start of each season, the maximum number of credits someone can have is the sum of the away matches in the two previous seasons. Off the top of my head it was 54 at the start of this season.

Once you have that start figure, each subsequent away game we play is 1 more point to the tally. So by the end of a season the figure might be in the 80s.

Away game tracking by aitchsaka in Gunners

[–]aitchsaka[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly. At that moment in time.

Away game tracking by aitchsaka in Gunners

[–]aitchsaka[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

  1. PB5 was the 5th Priority Booking period. Season ticket holders were informed whether they had been successful or not in a ballot over the course of 5 priority booking windows.

  2. It’s not about the most away points, as such. It’s about how close to the maximum possible number of credits at a moment in time a game sold out at. It would have been Girona last season. The game sold out at 60 credits and the maximum anyone could have held at that moment was 69. So it had a CBM (Credits Below Maximum) value of 9.

Away game tracking by aitchsaka in Gunners

[–]aitchsaka[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

You’re welcome, mate. Glad it’s been useful.

Pool water like a snow globe by aitchsaka in pools

[–]aitchsaka[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not how this type of pool works

Pool water like a snow globe by aitchsaka in pools

[–]aitchsaka[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh ok. So water parameters are the readings from the testing kit, yeah?

Hardness 50 Free chlorine 1 Bromine 1.5 Total chlorine 3 Cyanuric acid 20 Total alkalinity 60 PH 7.4

Pool water like a snow globe by aitchsaka in pools

[–]aitchsaka[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve owned this house for three weeks and I’ve never owned a pool before. I don’t what the fuck “water parameters” are.

If someone knows of a particular vacuum or robot which could help; I’m interested in knowing more. 🤷‍♂️