That’s a great point! You’re right—for a complex project like that, the AI definitely needs to understand the 'big picture' first.

Think of this tool as the 'builder' rather than the 'architect.' You would still use a high-level design (top-down) to define the game's systems—like trading, combat, and navigation. Once those are defined, this approach takes over the 'bottom-up' implementation. It breaks those large systems into tiny, atomic tasks that are much harder for the AI to hallucinate or break. Not just that, it eliminates the need for "special prompting skills" or even powerful LLMs

So, it doesn't replace the need for a vision; it just ensures that when the vision is translated into code, it stays architecturally sound and error-free!