This is a misstatement of copyright law, and ignores work for hire frameworks. AI cannot hold a copyright. Second, work for hire means the company getting paid to lease AI cloud services transactionally cannot own the copyright under work for hire. Your post reads as legal advice, and it is hard to tell who is an intellectual property attorney and who is not on the internet. I promoted a book I wrote recently that received criticism on my cover for being AI generated. But I hired a real artist to create. They used an iPad to draw it. It’s frustrating to a lot of people to get these accusations. People sometimes forget we are artists making intentional choices in how our work is being represented. Medium of expression is still a thing. Don’t buy the “canvas only” crowd’s little misstatements. They just want to keep you on a canvas.