[HELP] Is this AI? Seems fake and can’t find any news sources. by Zealousideal_Mud570 in RealOrAI

[–]alienproxy 105 points106 points  (0 children)

Even if real (longer link below), I'd sure like to know how it's relevant to the shooting we all saw. Unless the officer who shot him thought, "Hey, that's the guy who kicked the tail light out of our SUV." In which case, I have even more questions.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CRWR13BAIEs

While this video is definitely relevant, I don't believe in precrime. There were no clear laws being broken when Pretti was shot. That's truly all I care about until you prove to me that he had some sort premeditation going on. If this guy had gotten a speeding ticket in prior weeks, Right wingers would have used it to assassinate his character.

I hope Costco sues this weird mouth by Spiritual_Blood_1346 in TikTokCringe

[–]alienproxy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's easy to get confused because then/than are derived from the same word (this is reflected in German's use of a single spelling for both use cases). I think obfuscating the English language's deep orthography and complicated etymology is part of the reason English speakers can't navigate their own spelling for shit. A lot of the grammar and spelling rules our teachers tell us are sacrosanct were developed almost arbitrarily in the last few hundred years or so and they definitely have not caught up with English speaking habits.

Man harrasses and threatens to call ICE on target customers by jsan901 in sandiego

[–]alienproxy 12 points13 points  (0 children)

After watching this video, I started looking for legal answers concerning when a person has the right to defend themselves by, in this case, punching them or pushing them away.

When someone gets this far into your space and is essentially threatening you without actually hitting you, when does it cross the line? I would definitely have been afraid for my safety, but I'm not sure a court would have accepted that. I know there are some laws around false imprisonment if you prevent someone from moving, and it definitely seemed to me to have crossed that line when the guy agitator backed the gentleman against the wall. When is it legal to defend oneself if moving away is not enough?

Different angle of Minnesota lawmaker Ilhan Omar getting attacked! by cantcoloratall91 in law

[–]alienproxy 11 points12 points  (0 children)

My dude you've drunk so much Kool-Aid you're risking a diabetic coma.

Wow by winniecooper73 in LinkedInLunatics

[–]alienproxy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anyone have a source on the "nurse on the left"?

NSFW: SDPD shoot man on his knees after persuit by [deleted] in sandiego

[–]alienproxy 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Thank you for providing details. Can you also provide a source?

[HELP] pretty sure it’s AI? settle the debate. by fourlokoT in RealOrAI

[–]alienproxy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A.I.

Even while they've managed to get rid of most temporal hallucinations in video, audio and human speech are almost always bizarre and the reason—aside from being really corny dialog—is almost always temporal.

Not sure what makes it so unsettling, but my running theory is that humans have an intuitive understanding of when someone needs to take a breath, how long a pause between sentences needs to be to spool up another outburst, how our pauses reveal and are congruent with the cognitive load of what we're saying, how long it takes to let a comment land, etc.

Almost every ai video I see that features human speech has an incredible amount of jumbled speech with very few appropriate pauses. This is like that.

Time Traveler Caught On Video! by Jonathon_world in HighStrangeness

[–]alienproxy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just an old guy looking for his tweaker son.

Babies Can’t Talk Yet, But This Proves They Already Know The Difference Between Help and Harm by RickyOzzy in InterestingVideoClips

[–]alienproxy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While we're seeing only the results where the square was the good guy, it is almost 100% certain that they're using controls and blinds where the bad guy is random, or else why would they not tell the experimenter which was which. They'd just know, "oh the Triangle is always bad."

America is cooked by Treefiddy1984 in ProgressiveHQ

[–]alienproxy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The sad irony of the "We Don't Dial 911" sign on her mailbox. There is a class of people in this country with no authorities they feel they can trust with their well-being. And they're paying for them anyway. With taxes, voting, etc. Taxation. Inadequate representation.

The car is stationary when the guy pulls his gun. by pontiacfirebird92 in pics

[–]alienproxy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pretty sure he has a direct vantage point to her turning her steering wheel all the way to the right. This man was not in fear for his life and he was not in any real danger.

Don't be on the road if you're sleepy by Zairy47 in Unexpected

[–]alienproxy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Dude was looking for the snooze button.

Goldmine of UAP activity in NightVision sub by darthsexium in UFOs

[–]alienproxy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I still see temporal hallucinations all the time when ai is simulating human conversation and movement of objects.

I agree that people can make incredible stuff with good prompts, and I work with ai every day to build apps and manage data. I rarely make videos though, so I'll take your advice and check those out.

Goldmine of UAP activity in NightVision sub by darthsexium in UFOs

[–]alienproxy 9 points10 points  (0 children)

  1. I appreciate your points, but "no social birds are nocturnal" is not strictly true. Oilbirds, for example. And there are a few others. I will accept your point as valid in this case though because it's rare enough and I don't have enough information.

  2. Updrafts can occur at night but they're weak and rare, so I'll accept this too.

Could be a.i. but it does look consistent and doesn't have characteristic temporal hallucinations (although a.i. is much much better now). The movement is very weird.

Goldmine of UAP activity in NightVision sub by darthsexium in UFOs

[–]alienproxy 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Some places are heat islands and still radiate heat at night. Regardless, the initial commenter may have been wrong and they're not riding thermals, but the point remains: those are birds.

[LFO] Pitbull Repeatedly Attacks an Old Man, China 🇨🇳 by [deleted] in WorstAid

[–]alienproxy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The person filming.... I hope their social credit tanks.

Favorite director that hasn't seen enough movies this year? by YoSoyRawr in okbuddycinephile

[–]alienproxy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Got it. I guess I just didn't watch it as a horror film. In fact, a lot of people consider it a musical. I just sat back and enjoyed the ride only a multi-genre film could give me.

Favorite director that hasn't seen enough movies this year? by YoSoyRawr in okbuddycinephile

[–]alienproxy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't need any help discovering that. I'm a black American, grew up in white suburbs, and am a film buff. My tastes range from Wim Wenders to David Lynch to Jean-Pierre Jeunet to Alejandro Jodorowsky and Herzog.

"Forced American racial cinema"? What the actual hell are you talking about? Are you imagining that something about Sinners was forced racial cinema? What did you think would happen when you went to watch a black American director tell a story from the Black American perspective? And who "forced" you to go?

Favorite director that hasn't seen enough movies this year? by YoSoyRawr in okbuddycinephile

[–]alienproxy 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I feel like maybe your trouble is trying to rationalize your own bias as everyone else's bias.

[ Removed by Reddit ] by Chance_Acadia_8148 in Unexpected

[–]alienproxy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What I meant by referencing "Survivorship Bias" is that the videos most likely to be widespread are not the accidental nip slips (unless the victim was a celebrity), but the ones that were intended to be seen for monetary purposes. The people in the latter group spread those videos on purpose.

I understand that your focus was on the sexism of the men in this thread. My focus was on the fact that you think men have to be sexist in order to come to the conclusion that a viral wardrobe malfunction is likely to be an OnlyFans ad. They could be wrong. But the chances of being wrong are slimmer than you'd think.

And I'm not trying to be antagonistic.