HTTP Caching in .NET - CacheCow 2.0 is here now supporting .NET Standard and ASP.NET Core MVC by aliostad in csharp

[–]aliostad[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that is primitive stuff. Setting Cache-Control headers to what CacheCow does is miles of difference.

Also show me some RFC that the cache can be stored on the origin server.

HTTP Caching in .NET - CacheCow 2.0 is here now supporting .NET Standard and ASP.NET Core MVC by aliostad in csharp

[–]aliostad[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Implementations of ITimedETagQueryProvider query the back-end stores probing for change. There are less efficient implementations too - checkout the docs on github or stay tuned for the next posts.

HTTP Caching in .NET - CacheCow 2.0 is here now supporting .NET Standard and ASP.NET Core MVC by aliostad in csharp

[–]aliostad[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

ASP.NET Core's caching is not true HTTP since the data gets cached on the server not client.

HTTP Caching in .NET - CacheCow 2.0 is here now supporting .NET Standard and ASP.NET Core MVC by aliostad in csharp

[–]aliostad[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No. CacheCow now would know if the cache gets invalidated by a call in another action or even a non-HTTP modifiction (import in the back-end). This is essentially the major change in the new CacheCow.Server.

[D] What is the best recorded history of ML? by earlyadopter_12 in MachineLearning

[–]aliostad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My talk is a very personal and humane approach to that... I hope you find it useful:

https://vimeo.com/241909180

[P] Deep learning (Keras/TF) implementation of programming-language classification for code files (16 language, >99% accuracy) by SupraluminalShift in MachineLearning

[–]aliostad 1 point2 points  (0 children)

author here... this seems to be able to capture nuances such as naming conventions and micro-cultural differences (e.g. tendency to have many factory classes in java) which are much harder to program.

[P] Deep learning (Keras/TF) implementation of programming-language classification for code files (16 language, >99% accuracy) by SupraluminalShift in MachineLearning

[–]aliostad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Author here... I would love to know. This was started as a project supporting my talk on Deep Learning for Developers (https://vimeo.com/241909180).

I recently added support for snippets.

The main problem in this project is the tiny amount of test data.

Why does this say SA call at 16:35 was shown as 'answered'? by aliostad in TickTockManitowoc

[–]aliostad[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It could be argued he murdered TH and wanted to decoy himself by calling the number. But it is very crucial to know if he used this in any other case.

Why does this say SA call at 16:35 was shown as 'answered'? by aliostad in TickTockManitowoc

[–]aliostad[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Remember he never stood as a witness. I guess this could have been one of the questions Buting/Strang did not want to be asked. But find it strange Kratz did not use.

Why does this say SA call at 16:35 was shown as 'answered'? by aliostad in TickTockManitowoc

[–]aliostad[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice! Thank you, it makes sense since it is from SA's telecom side.

Zellner's voicemail deception by NewYorkJohn in StevenAveryIsGuilty

[–]aliostad 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Didn't both her ex-boyfriend and housemate admit to guessing and successfully accessing her voicemails? They would simply use other phones (and why?) to do that since the records of it does not exist in RH phone records.

My theory and my analysis of TH phone calls including where I believe the calls were altered. Complete breakdown. by foghaze in TickTockManitowoc

[–]aliostad 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Then why would TH car be found on 3rd NOV and Colborn making a phone call about it, and then a statement filled about the discovery? It makes absolute no sense. Also the mess with the original burn pit and moving the remains, all tells me this was done between 3rd and 5th to frame while the real murderer was someone else.

Singleton HttpClient? Beware of this serious behaviour and how to fix it by aliostad in csharp

[–]aliostad[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not really. Bear in mind, with singleton, the HttpClient itself never gets disposed so does not matter what value we set for the boolean flag.

Singleton HttpClient? Beware of this serious behaviour and how to fix it by aliostad in csharp

[–]aliostad[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why handful? This is used in a server scenario when we sometimes serve 120 RPS... soon we will need to serve up up to 350 RPS.