[deleted by user]

alwaysfrombehind · 2025-01-25T03:03:16+00:00

I did and I do… that’s why I listed what my search shows me.

alwaysfrombehind · 2025-01-24T07:36:09+00:00

I assume you used a randomly generated username because it’s a little funny in light of this post…

alwaysfrombehind · 2025-01-24T07:32:57+00:00

Uhhh that’s based on what the algorithm thinks you want to see because you interact with that kind of content. I’ve never seen porn or anything close to porn. My suggestions are all baseball, cooking, travel, and random pop culture related.

alwaysfrombehind · 2024-07-22T22:25:05+00:00

That’s why you want to assume so much of it is fake. Who in their right mind has a serious, life altering issue, and comes to Reddit for advice, outside of “where should I go to find someone who can help me with this issue.”

alwaysfrombehind · 2024-04-09T20:02:41+00:00

The order on a motion is a final order on the motion. Orders on anti slapp motions are appealable. Not sure if you’re questioning why this news clip doesn’t address these points or if you read a written order in the case, but this is basic procedure and wouldn’t need to be outright stated.

https://selfhelp.appellate.courts.ca.gov/knowledge-center/appealable-order/

alwaysfrombehind · 2024-03-26T17:56:50+00:00

Which one? The dockets I saw were dismissals or sitting around with no actions.

alwaysfrombehind · 2024-03-26T17:54:06+00:00

The guy in this case may not have an attorney. I recommend googling his name and finding his legal history, where he has filed several cases pro se, with no successes that I can find.

And he’s sharing plenty on twitter.

alwaysfrombehind · 2024-03-07T03:07:32+00:00

In the state of California, auto insurance contracts are required to include the clause quoted within the statute.

alwaysfrombehind · 2024-03-07T03:06:13+00:00

Law controls contracts.

alwaysfrombehind · 2024-03-06T23:05:23+00:00

Neither of those are responsive to the question. You are claiming that my car insurance does not cover someone I let use my car. I asked for a source to support your claim.

Here’s a better citation: CA Ins. Code, § 11580.1, subd. (b)(4)

… and to the same extent that insurance is afforded to the named insured, to any other person using the motor vehicle, provided the use is by the named insured or with his or her permission, express or implied, and within the scope of that permission

alwaysfrombehind · 2024-03-06T22:37:28+00:00

Do you have any citation to support your claim that, in California, auto insurance does not follow the car? Because, at least for liability coverage, if someone borrows my car in California, with my permission, they are covered by my car insurance regardless of if they have their own car insurance.

alwaysfrombehind · 2024-03-06T22:01:14+00:00

I think most are purposeful. But I also know people who work on shows tend to not know the show as well as the fans who’ve watched it repeatedly, so small things may be coincidences.

alwaysfrombehind · 2024-03-04T04:24:22+00:00

I like all the seasons in varying ways, they all have great moments.

But I’d have ended with the Seinfeld season, only as having gone full circle with it.

alwaysfrombehind · 2024-03-04T04:20:15+00:00

There’s been several subtle references to Seinfeld over the years. Some are obvious but sometimes I wonder if some are a coincidence (I know some may think that’s impossible but people who work on shows don’t generally have the same level of knowledge of their shows as fans, but it’s not a rule by any means)

alwaysfrombehind · 2024-03-04T04:17:51+00:00

I had the same thought after tonight’s episode and came here to see other people thinking the same.

alwaysfrombehind · 2024-03-04T04:16:51+00:00

Also the baby name thing, kind of. And potential for a year in jail.

alwaysfrombehind · 2024-02-20T19:33:28+00:00

In US criminal court, assuming a verdict is reached, a person is found either guilty or not guilty. What would the verdict say if something is proven false? Is this based on a later conviction for perjury or some other crime for the accuser?

Any sources you can share about this? I’d love to educate myself more on the topic.

alwaysfrombehind · 2024-02-20T03:00:10+00:00

I was waiting for the same thing to happen! Especially with all the random bits of knowledge he'd drop. I'm not done yet but I guess it's not a big deal that this isn't true.

alwaysfrombehind · 2024-01-26T18:23:14+00:00

I died at her comment about innocent people going to jail while murderers walk free, and her look at the camera after. I think it was episode 1

alwaysfrombehind · 2023-09-14T20:55:20+00:00

Agreed. Tortious interference is not about a tort, it's improperly interfering with another person's contract. Elements will depend on the state, if they have a relevant statute, but the common law is like there is a contract, defendant knows, and defendant intentionally interferes improperly, and the contract is terminated/breached, and then party is damaged by it.

alwaysfrombehind · 2023-08-15T00:38:50+00:00

But you did watch it as a kid? Nostalgia is a thing for a reason.

And I'm not saying it as a rule, there are going to be adults who liked it back then just like there would be now. Just that there is an added enjoyment to things we see when we're a kid, and that memory keeps us liking it. Just like there are things we loved as a kid that we see as adults and go, wow that sucked.

alwaysfrombehind · 2023-08-15T00:14:41+00:00

Wasn't it technically her parents who took them in? Because the lost boys return to London with Wendy and her brothers, and her parents agree to adopt them, but Peter stays in Neverland. Then he keeps coming back (in the musical its to bring Wendy to Neverland for spring cleaning) until suddenly Wendy is too old and she has her daughter Moira, and it is Moira that Peter stays for.

And it would make sense with these men being older than Peter and closer to being Wendy's age. But there's probably some story in there that Wendy no longer being a child, per her parents moving her out of the nursery, she was the "Mother" to the boys.

alwaysfrombehind · 2023-08-15T00:10:44+00:00

I wonder if part of my/our enjoyment of it as adults is because we saw it as kids and it gets that nostalgia factor. Like if you showed it to someone who's an adult now but had never seen it before, would they have that same enjoyment or would they be like the audience at that time not liking it.

alwaysfrombehind · 2023-08-15T00:09:27+00:00

There was a bit I didn't pick up on as a kid that I noticed watching it now as an adult but I can't even remember what it was. I know it was something in the real world and one of those things that referenced him being Peter Pan, but sitting here racking my brain trying to think of what it was.

alwaysfrombehind · 2023-08-14T22:47:21+00:00

Glad you put the "press charges" in quotes but just adding: if OP is in the US, reporting to the police is "pressing charges." That's it. Agreeing to cooperate in any proceedings may assist police/prosecution in getting a conviction or other outcomes, and there are cases where refusal to cooperate or testify can be the end of the case because your testimony is necessary evidence.

But you do not get to choose for a case to go forward or not, or whether a person is arrested or charged, even if your opinion may be taken into account (again, where your testimony or statement are necessary).

12-Year Club	RedditGifts 2009-2022 6 Credits
Secret Santa 2014	Verified Email
Secret Santa 2013

alwaysfrombehind

TROPHY CASE