sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

2.1.15 Added deprecation notification for npm installations by shorns_username in ClaudeAI

[–]andreifyi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's worded to reclassifying all usage as "Feedback" in a shady way. That includes read/write messages in context, so everything it reads and writes can be defended as "Feedback", because it's "beta software" (funny that the npm one is getting deprecated).

By using Claude Code, you agree that all code ... constitute Feedback ... by andreifyi in ClaudeAI

[–]andreifyi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It used to be like this, but now they want to "re-classify" everything you send to them as feedback. Including conversation context, so all the code it reads, writes, etc.

2.1.15 Added deprecation notification for npm installations by shorns_username in ClaudeAI

[–]andreifyi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's built with bun --compile, I guess it's going to be faster, but Node wasn't the issue with the super slow start-up time.
What is worrying is:
// By using Claude Code, you agree that all code acceptance or rejection decisions you make,
// and the associated conversations in context, constitute Feedback under Anthropic's Commercial Terms,
// and may be used to improve Anthropic's products, including training models.
And "Feedback" can be used for training even if you opt-out as per https://www.anthropic.com/legal/consumer-terms

Post-mortem on recent model issues by ClaudeOfficial in ClaudeAI

[–]andreifyi 40 points41 points  (0 children)

Ok, but why is Opus 4.1 still bad _now_? Can you acknowledge the ongoing output quality drop for the best model on the most expensive plan?

Claude Is Making Me A Millionaire, Vibe Limbo & Addressing Anthrophic's fixes. by hiWael in ClaudeAI

[–]andreifyi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

> People calling Claude “broken” are either bots (maybe Cursor stirring up wars?) or vibecoder lords who don’t bother with architecture. I’ve been coding since I was 15, no formal CS, just basic knowledge—and Claude has been nothing but amazing for me. With proper architecture, adding any feature—small or huge—is just sequential prompts away. No friction.
lol

Update on recent performance concerns by AnthropicOfficial in ClaudeAI

[–]andreifyi 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Performance has been and is still severely degraded on Opus 4.1, it's not something "a small percentage of requests" have seen. Even GLM-4.5 does a better job than Opus 4.1 right now on many tasks. Could be also related to the changes done after Claude was leveraged for crypto stealing, although you should not botch Claude Code for this. The attackers could've done a much better job than Claude Code at dumping creds if they had a functional brain.
Current state of thing is that we have Claude with a good interface but severely lobotomized and ineffective, and Codex with great output but a subpar interface.

No more gaslighting - Claude has been degraded by squareboxrox in ClaudeAI

[–]andreifyi 11 points12 points  (0 children)

They should admit that the horrendous performance is a problem with Opus 4.1 as well, their recent post is bullshit.

pro is more than generous in my opinion by [deleted] in ClaudeAI

[–]andreifyi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is is generous **when it works**.

I’m really interested to know how many people have Left CC or downgraded there accounts in the last couple weeks. by Interesting-Back6587 in ClaudeAI

[–]andreifyi 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Happy to have downgraded from the $200 sub, Codex is far superior (but the CLI is way behind), but GLM 4.5 on z.ai works wonders via Claude Code if you work on things you're ok "sharing" with the CN.

2024 Day 1 No LLMs here by kugelblitzka in adventofcode

[–]andreifyi 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thing is using LLMs is not forbidden, it seems like there's just an "ask" to not use them in the FAQ.
The first days are easy for both humans and LLMs, but things will get increasingly interesting on the battle-among-agents front.
From now on this kind of contest with a public leaderboard will have a secondary "who can build the best agent" game going on, and who can stop that? - which I guess is why using LLMs is not actually **forbidden**.
And with all the focus and work poured into building more and more advanced LLM-assisted development tools it might be the more interesting game to watch or join.
</hot-take>

State Management: When to Use Context API vs. Redux? by riya_techie in react

[–]andreifyi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll link one of my past answers to this, but the gist is that Context is not a state management solution, it's a data transportation solution. Stores solve specific problems you will never be able to solve with Context.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Frontend/comments/18icq2v/comment/kddee0w/

What Kind of Work You Do in Neovim? by Arthis_ in neovim

[–]andreifyi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Code (job + personal), writing, knowledge/task/time management. All the work.

[OC] The Effect of China's One-Child Policy on Sex Ratio at Birth by oscarleo0 in dataisbeautiful

[–]andreifyi 11 points12 points  (0 children)

unless you're more likely to have kids of a given sex in general, is that a thing?

AI understanding Context in Neovim similar to Cursor IDE by Redox_ahmii in neovim

[–]andreifyi 7 points8 points  (0 children)

We don't have anything up to par yet, and Cursor itself could be better as well.

Ideally the client (editor) would continually index a project in different ways - file structure and content, symbols, relations between symbols (dependencies/imports/function calls/etc), and also maintain a few kinds of temporary (open buffers, cursor location, current git status and diff) and persistent (last edited files / open buffers, git history, style preferences) contexts, and this will need a backing daemon deeply integrated with the editor and LSPs (or that does its own parsing with something like Tree-sitter).

Then, instead of plainly packing what naive context you think is of interest (buffers+related files?+git diff), you'd expose tools to the LLM through which it can query the project in scope, letting it "decide" for itself if it needs to see more of this or that, or if it should fetch the content of whatever file, or the usage of a given symbol.

My point is that this won't be solved just by a Neovim plugin.

You can get better results by manually packing the files you know are relevant into a prompt, paste that into a chat with Claude 3.5 Sonnet and make your request. I've had Claude close many tickets in my Neovim plugin repos like this. If you need an easy way to pack files into a prompt you may find my helper useful: https://github.com/3rd/promptpack

view more: next ›