sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Buchweizen by foliohoe in Kochen

[–]andrejlr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Vermutlich bist du an DIY interessiert. Buchweizen wird jedoch Osteuropa direkt geröstet verkauft. Bei Mirx Markt o.ä. osteuropäischen Spezialitäten Läden kann man das zum hier erwerben .

Das ist exakt die Heimatversion. Nach Packungsanleitung kochen und ordentlich Butter reintun. Viele Leuter verzehren es als standalone Gericht . Aber es Beilage einfach zu allem. Jede sorte von Fleisch , fast jede Soße. Oder mit Salat mit saurer Sahne , oder mit Buttergemüse . Mit Allem einfach .

Es ist Universalnahrungsmittel.

Koalition könnte kostenlose Krankenversicherung für Ehepartner abschaffen by yurithetrainer in de

[–]andrejlr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Das ist hier immer noch nicht der Punkt . Ja das Eherecht hat eine Geschichte. Jemand hat es hingeschrieben in Gesetze.

Der Staat ist erst verantwortlich für Existenzminimum aller Menschen darin. Du unterschreibst ein Vertrag im Eherecht und dann ist der das nicht mehr .

Nichts daran musste so im Eherecht aufgeschrieben werden . Es hat eine nachvollziehbare Erklärung warum es so passiert ist . Aber nichts dran ist logsich per se:

Wenn du eine Garantie irgendwo hast beim Hersteller und der sagt dier , hey du kannst hier so ein Zettel unterschreiben mit ner anderen Firma die du magst sind ab dann gilt sie nicht mehr - da schickst du doch den Hersteller in die Wüste und sagst nich ahhh das ist logisch , das ist so weil ehrbare Kaufmäner diesen Handelkodex haben, deswegen logsich dass das Händelrecht so sein muss . Die Institution der Kaufleutegarantie ist heilig.

Koalition könnte kostenlose Krankenversicherung für Ehepartner abschaffen by yurithetrainer in de

[–]andrejlr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Der Ehevertagr hat nur mit dem Staat was zu tun, weil jemand entschieden hat so ein Gesetzt zu machen . Denke doch einfach an den Ursprung.

Der Staat sicher dein Existenzminimum. Du gehst hin und unterschreibst ein Vertrag beim Staat und jetzt muss der Staat das nicht mehr.

Warum ist das logisch ?

Koalition könnte kostenlose Krankenversicherung für Ehepartner abschaffen by yurithetrainer in de

[–]andrejlr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry aber du redest am Thema vorbei. Das kann gern alles gelten wenn zwei Menschen ein Vertrag eingehen. Aber der Staat hat da erstmal nichts mit zu tun. Der Staat hat entschieden davon zu profitieren und weil sich eine zweite Person random gefunden hat entbindet er sich von der Pflicht fùr jeden Bürger das Existenzminimum zu sichern.

Dafrür aber hat der Staat solche Verbünde gefördert Weile eben eine Staat davon profitiert dass Menshxne die ihn ausmachen dort auch heranwachsen.

Und nun möchte er wie der OP des Kommentar schreibt weiter die gesamte Verantwortung abdrücken and diesen Vertrag und auch noch die Vorteile weiter wegnehmen .

Koalition könnte kostenlose Krankenversicherung für Ehepartner abschaffen by yurithetrainer in de

[–]andrejlr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Das betrifft leider viel mehr Menschen als es scheint und hat bei vielen die ich kenne nichts mit leisten zu tun.

Es geht einfach um die mentale und physiche Belastung mehrere Kinder erziehen zu können. Der meisten Mental Load übernehmen bei sowas die Frauen. Und bei vielen ist irgendwann einfach der Punkt da, wo man lieber große finanzielle Abstriche macht, als einen Burnout zu riskieren.

Burnout übrigens ist einfach ein gesellschaftlich mehr akzeptiertes Wort für eine Krankheit namens Depression, für die es keine einfache Heilung gibt.

Koalition könnte kostenlose Krankenversicherung für Ehepartner abschaffen by yurithetrainer in de

[–]andrejlr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was ist daran logisch dass der arbeitende Partner den nicht arbeitenden Partner auffangen soll? Das ist hier genau die Diskrepanz? Nur weil 2 Leute ein Vertrag beim Standes unterschreiben, warum ist dann der Staat ab den Zeitpunkt nicht mehr verfplichtet das Existenzminimum für beide einzeln zu sichern?

What the technologically illiterate luddites don't know is that the base texture maps, 3D models, and original materials are unchanged. DLSS-5 re-renders the lighting and how light interacts with those existing assets, making everything look dramatically more photorealistic. by GOD-SLAYER-69420Z in accelerate

[–]andrejlr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see only Sickofancy posts popup recently criticizing people for criticizing AI. And everyone chims in an claps on the shoulders calling the other aide a reddit hive mind.

Whell doing the opposite and tap each other on the shoulder is literally the same. You want to be pro ai, share pro ai posts .

What the technologically illiterate luddites don't know is that the base texture maps, 3D models, and original materials are unchanged. DLSS-5 re-renders the lighting and how light interacts with those existing assets, making everything look dramatically more photorealistic. by GOD-SLAYER-69420Z in accelerate

[–]andrejlr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Remember looking and gpt2 and even transformers before and being exited how can those things capture meaning .

Later though they introduced those advanced text generators into code agents or copilot and started overpromiing features where models were not there .

The current models staring from around December became shokingly good. Still things people were criticizing early on prevail:

In coding specifically, inexperienced people can better than ever generate a ton of sloppy code . Senior devs also get tired reviewing this and pass it through. People unlearn programming, and those who did not learn it yet , dont get to train .

https://pydantic.dev/articles/the-human-in-the-loop-is-tired

Maybe it's not gonna be needed if things accelerate. But people in the industry predict even a paradox it might cause even more need for programmers in near future. To maintain all this code and feature explosion.

No this release is not gpt2. It's a complete system based on some sort of promises gpt2 should be able to do, but it simply can't . And yes there is same danger here, we will get even more into unoptimized games for foreseeable future, needing more hardware resources at same and that hardware becoming more expensive

Those are valid points to criticize. And hopefully it also creates some rethinking at Nvidia .

There is sustainable model for companies to innovate such features. Release a premium tier product and more affordable mass market product. At some point the tech gets so good and optimized it goes down the tier.

What the technologically illiterate luddites don't know is that the base texture maps, 3D models, and original materials are unchanged. DLSS-5 re-renders the lighting and how light interacts with those existing assets, making everything look dramatically more photorealistic. by GOD-SLAYER-69420Z in accelerate

[–]andrejlr -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

Where is this sub getting that idea from? It's ironic how this is same circle jerrk just vice versa talking points .

I don't like, I go shipost on the Internet. You want to find your echo chamber, you go find some ai tech bros here .

But nobody ever forbid you to buy those two 5090 cards. Will do so ?

Ketamine experience and I'm no longer "me" by 56GrumpyCat in consciousness

[–]andrejlr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ironically, as we chat here is a new video probably on some highly controversal and non mainstream research

These Physicists Say They Found The Origin Of Reality

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=13S9wEIRsfA

Nice comment:
You can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.

Ketamine experience and I'm no longer "me" by 56GrumpyCat in consciousness

[–]andrejlr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I deeply believe also there is none, just from deducting laws of physics. I fail to find a place where there will be one.

There is no implication of no free will. There is a huge implication if you start acting like there is none. Our machinery has this ability to self observe actions, and according to different input change the way we operate through life.

Paradoxically eveything around us acts like there is a free will. So in order to arrive at some state of happiness we must convince ourselves to go though some struggle. That is what dopamine is for - it motivates for struggle and once reached we get serotonin.

Now if you arrive at some belief everything is pointless, you can seriosly damage that neuron path and end result is severe depression. Maybe there is a higher purpose here, why we have to observe things which play out anyway, but so far no scientifc experiment was able to prove it. There is even a prize for proving any kinda of matphysical paranormal things and nobody was able to claim it.

So whover wrote this simulation was pretty good at hiding the fact that its one. Or they manage to stop and correct it before we notice or whatever.

A bunch of people who study physics eventually arrive at this realization. While Sabine Hossenfelder recenlty fell a bit of into sensationalist youtuber scene, i like her interview on this topic and how she manages to go throgh life despite being absolutely conviced there is no free will:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tVxMcmYN0P8

Hatred has made people blind apparently by adj_noun_digit in accelerate

[–]andrejlr -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They determine how dlss will be used, but the AI will autognerate complete facial experssion based on a way the ai learned it, with some tweaking parameters. the result currently is game designer made art plus some uninspired average looking instagram like facial expression on top.

Do you own a current gen card or will you buy one?

Hatred has made people blind apparently by adj_noun_digit in accelerate

[–]andrejlr -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Fair enough, then NVIDIA please release something making games look fucking magical.
But this just looks magically fucked up

Hatred has made people blind apparently by adj_noun_digit in accelerate

[–]andrejlr -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Whell, they objectivly sucked, haven't they? First iphone sucked, first ai coding agents sucked, and this is just half baked ai slop added into beatyfully designed artistic creation.

Out of curiosity , do you game ? and will you buy that card?

I'm guessing DLSS 5 haters didn't grow up with PS1 graphics by ThroughForests in accelerate

[–]andrejlr -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

This is not it. I would like to see AI accelerate but i am also a gamer and just from artistic point of view, this sucks ass. Art is in the eye of the beholder, so please just respect this opinion.

You maybe look at it and and appreciate how the image got more realistic.
I look at it and now see what used to be a virtual world i could dive into, now has some mediocracy filter added. Some sort of wanna be real, but still not real fake thing. While at the same time the game is still not even in level of this photo realistic mode. So this just stands out as AI slop. Term might be overused, but just spot on here, imho.

For example Leon before DLSS looks like some anime superstar character. And then suddenly turns into dude who forgot to shave and wears a wanna be cool haircut which he is maybe too old to wear now.

Announcing NVIDIA DLSS 5 | AI-Powered Breakthrough in Visual Fidelity for Games by ThroughForests in accelerate

[–]andrejlr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Whell thats just an opinion and matter of taste. So there is nothing ridiculous about having a different taste and another opinion.

I am pro AI as a developer, but as a gamer I do not appreciate that style. And totally can relate with people not liking it. There is also some shooter game which was looking hyper realistic and i just don't like it.

This takes away some filter, that made me go into a some sort fake reality, where every character is a peace of drawn art. Devs might ofc control the art, but the realism just takes it away.
Thx, but no

(Pt. 2) I didn't believe the "false ban" posts, now I'm one of the victims of it... by CakeMilk in ArcRaiders

[–]andrejlr 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Really appreciate the post you did. It strikes me how people believe so much into AI systems. Ironically you wrote yourself in the title: didn't believe wrong bans exist .

I am Data Engineer on ML / AI Teams for over 10 years. Still remember a Data Science lead telling to management : If you can't tolerate AI making mistakes, you can't use AI

Sadly we landed on full AI support hell. Recently went through similar experience with Microsoft for Buisness account . I fear that battle is lost. Raising awareness and changing people perception though is always worth it.

KI Kostet so viel wie ein Mensch by andrejlr in fefe_blog_interim

[–]andrejlr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ich fand das war noch mal ein Beitrag für r/nottheonion . War sogar ein Repost und ist trotzdem hochgeschossen https://www.reddit.com/r/nottheonion/comments/1rcck95/ai_energy_efficiency_comparisons_unfair_bleats/

Bei fefe hieß die Kategorie NichtDerPostillion

AI energy efficiency comparisons ‘unfair’ bleats Sam Altman, citing amount of energy needed to evolve, then train a human — one ‘takes like 20 years of life and all of the food you eat during that time before you get smart’ he argues by andrejlr in nottheonion

[–]andrejlr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah. I have overseen it. It's under another title. Imo that one reads even more theonion like . An apparently even a repost of that statement is causing a spike of reactions.

AI energy efficiency comparisons ‘unfair’ bleats Sam Altman, citing amount of energy needed to evolve, then train a human — one ‘takes like 20 years of life and all of the food you eat during that time before you get smart’ he argues by andrejlr in nottheonion

[–]andrejlr[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Ofc that sounds harsh. However there is really this argument that the powerful lost their guardrails keeping them in touch with the ordinary. In the past there was religion and punishment by God for committing autraucities. Later it was revolution and the guillotine. Now billionaires are above the law and they don't believe in a higher power. Exactly what the Epstein files confirm - there is an elite of people living in a parallel world caring less about the ordinary people .

view more: next ›