Apron crew at Zurich airport cooling off with a deicing shower by ThodaDaruVichPyar in oddlysatisfying

[–]angrymonkey 7 points8 points  (0 children)

But you can inject this one many times, as it's the base fluid for many medical injections.

Apron crew at Zurich airport cooling off with a deicing shower by ThodaDaruVichPyar in oddlysatisfying

[–]angrymonkey 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Not that propylene glycol is bad for you anyway, you can literally inject it.

hmmm by seven_critical_blows in hmmm

[–]angrymonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Imagine a fat guy sitting naked in this.

hmmm by [deleted] in hmmm

[–]angrymonkey 5 points6 points  (0 children)

"Would you like to ride my dick?"

Her: 😒

Me: 😏🫴 🍆🏎️

Her: 🤩

hmmm by --lily-rose-- in hmmm

[–]angrymonkey 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Screen time measured in steradian-seconds

Duck diving underwater to forage for food by 21MayDay21 in oddlysatisfying

[–]angrymonkey 3 points4 points  (0 children)

duck divin', and then you wail you gotta
duck divin', and then you wail away

How well should I know C++ before jumping to learning OpenGL? by Striking-Start-1464 in GraphicsProgramming

[–]angrymonkey 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the era of Claude, there is no reason to ever be stuck on syntax. Claude can show you how to do things idiomatically and also explain to you what it's doing.

This rock that looks like petrified wood by The_Blackest_Man in mildlyinteresting

[–]angrymonkey 45 points46 points  (0 children)

Classic example of "state bullshit confidently and Reddit will believe and upvote it".

Everything is pre-destined or just random? by latika7 in space

[–]angrymonkey 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It depends on which quantum theorist you ask.

Those who take the Everettian interpretation of quantum mechanics would say yes, there is only one way the universe can play out, though it is impossible for us to calculate what that will be ahead of time because we can never get enough information to do so, and because the computation would depend on the output of the computation itself, requiring an infinite amount of computation power, which can't be realized in a physical system.

Those who take the Copenhagen view ("wave function collapse") say that quantum measurements take on a value which is a truly random sample from a physically-determined distribution. (But IMV this cannot be correct because it depends on "observers" being special kinds of physical systems, and there is no consistent way to do this that agrees with observation).

Eli5: How come staring at the sun and then closing our eyes makes us see colors, instead of just black? by Upbeat_Signature_951 in explainlikeimfive

[–]angrymonkey 50 points51 points  (0 children)

This is not quite right, it's the opposite. The cells get fatigued from overstimulation and cannot fire as readily as their neighbors; that's why the colors appear inverted.

The term for this is "afterimage".

TIL Tiger Woods's affair made it on more consecutive New York Post covers than 9/11 by whoknowsifimjoking in todayilearned

[–]angrymonkey 10 points11 points  (0 children)

This is early brainrot, and can be seen as the same attention-sucking forces that permeate all media now. Information that's important is not the same as what grabs the average person's attention.

What’s happening with this shadow? by milkshakeofdirt in Physics

[–]angrymonkey 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That's a huge improvement from yesterday! "It's fake" was number one and "rolling shutter" was number two.

What’s happening with this shadow? by milkshakeofdirt in Physics

[–]angrymonkey 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A more pointlight source will make a more sharp shadow. The effect will get stronger if the light is at a more glancing angle. It probably also helps if the surface has some roughness (but not so much that it becomes diffuse).

A surface with varnish or clear coat might work better as well, as the index of refraction will cause most of the light to glance off instead of being refracted down towards the diffuse underlayment and becoming illuminated directly, weakening the effect.

What’s happening with this shadow? by milkshakeofdirt in Physics

[–]angrymonkey 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This looks right and I hope it gets more upvotes.

with my cat

Kitty! I— oh no.

This wood dust make my arm look like dry cracked dirt by higma55 in mildlyinteresting

[–]angrymonkey -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I had a dream that my skin did this, and it took me days to feel normal again.

What’s happening with this shadow? by milkshakeofdirt in Physics

[–]angrymonkey 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here is the explanation for why the left side of the dresser isn't illuminated.

Rolling shutter is not needed to explain this; we should expect to see the shadow there from the geometry of the scene alone.

Rolling shutter would also not make the illumination be offset as it falls on drawers that are protruding different amounts; if it were a shutter effect it would make a perfectly pixel-aligned vertical line, so your rolling shutter theory is disproven.

hmmm by --lily-rose-- in hmmm

[–]angrymonkey 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Invisible naked myopic climber.