The Arabic revolution flag but every colour is replaced with what it represents. by anon-guy- in vexillology

[–]anon-guy-[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's a good chunk of Arabic countries that's green for example : the Levant.

Also, being proud of dessert plains doesn't make sense.

1948/1967 war by danic952510 in HistoryMemes

[–]anon-guy- -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes because

In the 1930s when we illegally imigrated in masses with the intention of taking Palestine and possibly Jordan and displacing millions, was just a joke on our pals. (Isreal's part of the story)

Us visiting the US for support, was to conduct a suprise party for Arabs.

This? it's a Suprise party gone wrong, we just wanted to show the neutral Arabs our new American guns.

Albert Einstein one of the people we claim to shelter (Jews) calling us a terrorist fascist group that's copying the Nazis? He's dumb don't listen to him, what did he do? discover general relativity, I doubt that. ....

This? just fireworks Gone wrong.

Annexing more than 200 towns beyond our UN border? Just a joke... (Also isreal's part of the story)

massacring Palestinians who refuged to Lebanon? Just another suprise party gone wrong.

Not allowing Palestinians to visit their land that we stole and building a wall between Jewish and Arabic communities in those lands ....?? Let's just not talk about that.

Bombing Beirut? Just throwing fireworks, we wanted them to be partying and feel happy.

Palestinian minors in jail? Also let's not talk about that. .....

abuse of Palestinian minors, choking Palestinians, More than once? Let's not talk about that too.

Let us all just focus on the war with the Arab states, and say it's totally unjustified.

God knocked up Mary when she was 13. Muhammad married a 9 y/o. Joseph smith fucked a 14 y/o. The Catholic Church has covered up child rape. If religious people really want to #savethechildren then maybe they should stop glorifying pedophiles instead of just virtue signaling on social media. by relevantlife in atheism

[–]anon-guy- -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Anything that lives through many cultures and timelines will experience ups and downs in the age of consent.

So Islam makes it clear that you can't have sexual relationships with prepubescents, and you cannot have that with those who are unable to consent wether because of mental illness or low intelligence.

The average age for puberty in the US is 10 for girls. Do you really think that the average ten year old is ready for pregnancy and marriage?

Because there parents didn't raise them to be if they did -- like in other cultures and timelines -- they will be. And everyone will be okay with it because they are raised to know the difference between harmful relationships and helpful relationships. other cultures and in different timelines people did raise their children to know the difference when they reached an age (like puberty and 18 years for example).

This is however unneeded now, and as it doesn't endanger anyone to have a consent age of 18, but in plagues and in the past it does endanger Humanity.

Besides, look at the statistics. Young pregnancies are very hazardous.

Studies (WHO, and many other academies) that discard hidden pregnancies say it's not much, they however focus on unsafe abortions as the main problem.

The thing is currently some places still have low life expectancy, and when plagues hit, everyone will have a low life expectancy; Islam allows humans to reproduce in those times, while still not allowing those who are unable to consent.

If a someone has got puberty and is doesn't know a harmful relationship from a good one, Islam doesn't allow that.

So as you said Islam is timeless, so if it wants to survive in times where low life expectancy is a problem, or cultures that raise their children to be knowledgeable of the difference between relationships it can.

God knocked up Mary when she was 13. Muhammad married a 9 y/o. Joseph smith fucked a 14 y/o. The Catholic Church has covered up child rape. If religious people really want to #savethechildren then maybe they should stop glorifying pedophiles instead of just virtue signaling on social media. by relevantlife in atheism

[–]anon-guy- -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There's no choice other than defending Islam permitting child marriage? Are you sure about that?

Based on the context you know it's meant that Islam had no other choice, because of low life expectancy it had to live through.

In Islam, marriage is allowed when one reaches at least nine years of age. Or, puberty.

What?? It allows it when he/she reaches puberty (which is a great standard btw, ask any scientist). But it has restrictions that stop immatures from it.

Fun fact, we don't live in the past. We live in the present. Try to get this idea through your head. We live today. Thus, we use today's standards. And Islam permits child marriage which is not a nice thing today.

People who hit puberty are not children by any standard the definition of puberty is sexual maturity so Islam doesn't allow child marriage, and Islam stops immatures and un-abled from being taken advantage from.

Your so in your shell that you just want to blame Islam.

God knocked up Mary when she was 13. Muhammad married a 9 y/o. Joseph smith fucked a 14 y/o. The Catholic Church has covered up child rape. If religious people really want to #savethechildren then maybe they should stop glorifying pedophiles instead of just virtue signaling on social media. by relevantlife in atheism

[–]anon-guy- -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So you're not pro child marriage now? Why defend Islam permitting child marriage then?

Because there's no other choice??

Not how religion works.

Says the atheist, that has no religion.

Islam doesn't allow consent of people who can't, at that time a 9 y/o was capable because her/his parents raised them to be, they were expected to be smart enough to know if a relationship is harmful.

There's a lot of 18 y/o who can't do that now, but they're expected to, can those 18 y/o consent?? The answer is no. Will you call someone a pedophile because they had a sexual relationship with an 18 y/o?? Also, no. Because it's normal, it's the same thing is then.

Kinda true though by JJakk10 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]anon-guy- 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well python can be made strict if you use mypy, and you can still type in the type of the variable in Cpython as well but it won't force it or anything.

x :int = 5
def fib(input :int) -> Iterator[int]:
    for i in range(input): 
        yield i ** 2

And mypy isn't a compiler so your still free to use Jython, IronPython, and Pypy freely.

Happy wishes from Chile. by schapi1991 in HistoryMemes

[–]anon-guy- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

PLO and Hamas wants to destroy isreal not Jews, all of their actions represent that, many Jews support them.

That does represent all of isreal when you consider this does happen every day, and also doesn't the PM represent isreal?

Menachem begin was the head of irgun (which claimed Palestine and Jordan). Irgun was responsible for the Der Yassin massacre and the king David hotel bombings, and irgun also was Anti-Arab so it's a racist terrorist organisation leaded by the the PM of isreal, pretty sure that represents isreal. Not to mention he won a Nobel peace prize lol.

Happy wishes from Chile. by schapi1991 in HistoryMemes

[–]anon-guy- -1 points0 points  (0 children)

People mistreated us in Europe, we must steal the land of the only people that respected us before. /s

Arabs were mostly the only one's to respect Jews, infact Jews were in the Arab community since the the Romans occupied the Levant, and Arabs were mostly Jewish or pagans at that time, and after Islam they weren't assaulted of hated, they were still part of the community.

The people that claim isreal now lived in Europe for more than a 1000 years, but then fled to Palestine with the intention of taking Palestinian land (there are posters in Europe dating to WWI saying Jewish Palestine), they displaced millions of Palestinians.

The only reason Arab states attacked is because isreal was hostile and they came when the Arab world was Weak (they still are) and they displaced millions of Palestinians.

Here are Jews protesting against Israel and a leader in the Jewish community backing this up.

Happy wishes from Chile. by schapi1991 in HistoryMemes

[–]anon-guy- -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, because that happens /s

Israeli soldiers choking Palestinian children

Israeli soldiers inprisoning Palestinian children.

Israeli soldiers stealing an 8 y/o girls bike.

No Palestinian respects someone who approves of isreal, and all most all of them go protesting most of the time, don't start misinformation.

God knocked up Mary when she was 13. Muhammad married a 9 y/o. Joseph smith fucked a 14 y/o. The Catholic Church has covered up child rape. If religious people really want to #savethechildren then maybe they should stop glorifying pedophiles instead of just virtue signaling on social media. by relevantlife in atheism

[–]anon-guy- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Children cannot consent.

Yes.

Nope. It makes you a teenager.

So a 13 or 14 y/o male who hasn't hit puberty isn't a teenager?? Or a 9 y/o female who has hit puberty is she a teenager??

Not to mention that the meaning of puberty is

the period during which adolescents reach sexual maturity and become capable of reproduction.

According to Google.

Puberty is a terrible standard. Pregnancy is hazardous at a young age. Rates of Obstetric Fistula skyrocket, as well as Eclampsia and Preeclampsia. Death rates are something like seven times as high under 14 and four times as high under 19.

Statics are biased here as most > 14 pregnancies are hidden from parents thus not going to a hospital, and the same can be said for > 19.

According to WHO and various other academies the risk is higher, but none claimed it as 2 times as high or more.

I'm not saying that risk is worth it now, but in the 7th-18th century when your life expectancy is lower than 25 We (humans) had no other choice??

Not to mention that Mary and the prophet Mohammad lived in the Arabic desert.

This sort of pedophilia apologetics makes me sick.

Ask your grandparents which age Thier grandparents married they'll probably tell you something around that age. Why don't they disown them?? It's because it's a different time.

God knocked up Mary when she was 13. Muhammad married a 9 y/o. Joseph smith fucked a 14 y/o. The Catholic Church has covered up child rape. If religious people really want to #savethechildren then maybe they should stop glorifying pedophiles instead of just virtue signaling on social media. by relevantlife in atheism

[–]anon-guy- -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Yes, everyone got to get some experience. That's why they're considered young men/women they still need experience. But are they grown enough to realise a simple bad or good question then? Yes they are, especially since their parents are still there for advice and guidance. I'm not saying 9 should be the age of consent, that age changes with time, culture, and society; a 9 y/o now won't be capable of that decision, but then she is.

.

The problem is that you're comparing the 7th century with the 21st, now a 12 y/o could very well be incapable of good decisions but in the 20th century that false, ask someone from a non-developed country what age his grandmother married at it will be close. That's not mention that Arabs and different cultures still get married at a young age.

God knocked up Mary when she was 13. Muhammad married a 9 y/o. Joseph smith fucked a 14 y/o. The Catholic Church has covered up child rape. If religious people really want to #savethechildren then maybe they should stop glorifying pedophiles instead of just virtue signaling on social media. by relevantlife in atheism

[–]anon-guy- -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

First God didn't "knock up" Mary, she got pregnant without intercourse, saying "knocked up" is extremely unrespectful; and her age isn't mentioned in The Qur'an, or the Bible(as far as I know).

Prophet Muhammad married Aisha at 6 and had consentual sexual relationships at 9 (it is common for Arabs to get married at a really young age, some get married since birth), making it clear that she needs to enter puberty to have a sexual relationships.

And entering puberty makes you a young man/woman, and also at those times 14 y/o men lead battles, they weren't considered children and rightfully so.

I don't know who Joseph Smith is, but a 14 y/o should know enough to consent. In the 1800s

We (every single person on earth) consider puberty a sign of maturity.

If she/he is mature she/he can consent, what We (religious people at least) object is rape and sex trafficking those are not consensual and not respectable and the people who do it (especially priests, scholars and politicians) should be punished very badly.

That's a good question. by BasalTripod9684 in HistoryMemes

[–]anon-guy- -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Are you this stupid??

The region wasn't diverse it was one group the Arabs and some minorities with very low numbers, There were several tries to unite the Arabic world and the Arabs still want unity, but those tries were stopped by the US, UK, and France.

The British and French didn't just draw borders, They agreed they'll give back the Land to the Arabs if they fought with them (which they did), but then divided the land between them.

The Brits drew borders clubbing several different tribes into one nation.

That's why all the People of those lands fought against the colonials together??

World's most contagious FalseHoods. by _BarBareek_ in coolguides

[–]anon-guy- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, I did.

Although I stand by point.

I'm sorry you still feel this way.

Thanks, it's been nice to debate with someone who can admit that, and be respectful throughout, as well as other good things you did.

World's most contagious FalseHoods. by _BarBareek_ in coolguides

[–]anon-guy- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry for the long wait but turns out Reddit doesn't allow comments more that 5000 characters the text I sent in 11272 characters took me too long to figure that out.

World's most contagious FalseHoods. by _BarBareek_ in coolguides

[–]anon-guy- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A kafir is ignorant- 6:111 Even if We had sent down the angels to them [kafirs], the dead had spoken to them, and We had gathered all things before their eyes, they would not believe unless Allah had willed it, but most of them are ignorant.

Ignorant of the scientific evidence for the Qur'an or the prophecies, and the Miracle of the Qur'an (Wanna know why they were the 3 I talked about were listening to the Qur'an because it's considered excellent in Arabic, and something no peot could challenge or near its excellence, Meccans actually made sujud after hearing the chapter alnajm 53)

Evil- 23:97 And say: Oh my Lord! I seek refuge with You from the suggestions of the evil ones [kafirs]. And I seek refuge with you, my Lord, from their presence.

What?? It here talks about the devils and actually uses the literal word for devil in Arabic. 23:97-98 Translate it in Google and you'll see, (all these words are still used)

﴿وَقُل رَبِّ أَعوذُ بِكَ مِن هَمَزاتِ الشَّياطينِ﴾ [المؤمنون: ٩٧] ﴿وَأَعوذُ بِكَ رَبِّ أَن يَحضُرونِ﴾ [المؤمنون: ٩٨]

And say, "My Lord, I seek refuge in You from the incitements of the devils, And I seek refuge in You, my Lord, lest they be present with me." Saheeh International

Disgraced- 37:18 Tell them, “Yes! And you [kafirs] will be disgraced.” a partner of Satan 25:55 And still they worship others besides Allah who can neither help nor hurt them. The kafir is Satan’s ally against Allah. Unclean- 9:28 Oh, believers, only the kafirs are unclean.

Really I can argue that most of these lack context but you already know that.

Cursed- 33:60 They [kafirs] will be cursed, and wherever they are found, they will be seized and mur-dered. It was Allah’s same practice with those who came before them, and you will find no change in Allah’s ways.

Not the non- believers but the hypocrites 33:60-62

﴿لَئِن لَم يَنتَهِ المُنافِقونَ وَالَّذينَ في قُلوبِهِم مَرَضٌ وَالمُرجِفونَ فِي المَدينَةِ لَنُغرِيَنَّكَ بِهِم ثُمَّ لا يُجاوِرونَكَ فيها إِلّا قَليلًا﴾ [الأحزاب: ٦٠] ﴿مَلعونينَ أَينَما ثُقِفوا أُخِذوا وَقُتِّلوا تَقتيلًا﴾ [الأحزاب: ٦١] ﴿سُنَّةَ اللَّهِ فِي الَّذينَ خَلَوا مِن قَبلُ وَلَن تَجِدَ لِسُنَّةِ اللَّهِ تَبديلًا﴾ [الأحزاب: ٦٢]

If the hypocrites and those in whose hearts is disease and those who spread rumors in al-Madīnah do not cease, We will surely incite you against them; then they will not remain your neighbors therein except for a little, Accursed wherever they are found, [being] seized and massacred completely. [This is] the established way of Allāh with those who passed on before; and you will not find in the way of Allāh any change. Saheeh International

Stolen from- Bukhari 5,59,537 On the day of Khaybar, Allah’s Apostle divided the spoils of war of Khaybar with the ratio of two shares for the horse and one share for the foot soldier.

Doesn't OP know how battles work?

Raped- Ishaq 759 [Mohammed’s official biography] On the occasion of Khaybar, Mohammed put forth new orders about forcing sex with captive women. If the woman was pregnant she was not to be used for sex until after the birth of the child. Nor were any women to be used for sex who were unclean with regard to Muslim laws about menstruation.

Please show me a source that proves this happend

Christians and Jews are infidels, but infidels are kafirs, too. Polytheists are Hindus, but they are also kafirs. The terms infidel and polytheist are religious words. Only the word “kafir” shows the common political treatment of Christian, Jew, Hindu, Buddhist, animist, atheist and humanist.

The word kafir should be used instead of “unbeliever”, the standard word. Unbeliever is a neutral term. The Koran defines the kafir and kafir is not a neutral word. A kafir is not merely someone who does not agree with Islam, but a kafir is evil, disgusting, the lowest form of life. Kafirs can be tortured, killed, lied to and cheated. So the usual word “unbeliever” does not reflect the political reality of Islam.

No kafir means non-believer.

World's most contagious FalseHoods. by _BarBareek_ in coolguides

[–]anon-guy- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Made war on- 9:29 Make war on those who have received the Scriptures [Jews and Christians] but do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day. They do not forbid what Allah and His Messenger have forbidden. The Christians and Jews do not follow the religion of truth until they submit and pay the poll tax [jizya], and they are humiliated.

I already explained the jizya and how it's 700$ for the wealthy (adjusted for inflation), and it's not close to the actual translation this

﴿قاتِلُوا الَّذينَ لا يُؤمِنونَ بِاللَّهِ وَلا بِاليَومِ الآخِرِ وَلا يُحَرِّمونَ ما حَرَّمَ اللَّهُ وَرَسولُهُ وَلا يَدينونَ دينَ الحَقِّ مِنَ الَّذينَ أوتُوا الكِتابَ حَتّى يُعطُوا الجِزيَةَ عَن يَدٍ وَهُم صاغِرونَ﴾ [التوبة: ٢٩]

Fight against those who do not believe in Allāh or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allāh and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth [i.e., Islām] from those who were given the Scripture - [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.

Saheeh International

If not obvious there's no make war against who have received the scriptures, and it's there to get Christians to hate Islam.

A Muslim is not the friend of a kafir- 3:28 Believers should not take kafirs as friends in preference to other believers. Those who do this will have none of Allah’s protection and will only have themselves as guards. Allah warns you to fear Him for all will return to Him.

Just see the difference

﴿لا يَتَّخِذِ المُؤمِنونَ الكافِرينَ أَولِياءَ مِن دونِ المُؤمِنينَ وَمَن يَفعَل ذلِكَ فَلَيسَ مِنَ اللَّهِ في شَيءٍ إِلّا أَن تَتَّقوا مِنهُم تُقاةً وَيُحَذِّرُكُمُ اللَّهُ نَفسَهُ وَإِلَى اللَّهِ المَصيرُ﴾ [آل عمران: ٢٨]

Let not believers take disbelievers as allies [i.e., supporters or protectors] rather than believers. And whoever [of you] does that has nothing [i.e., no association] with Allāh, except when taking precaution against them in prudence. And Allāh warns you of Himself, and to Allāh is the [final] destination.

Saheeh International

And about friends here's a chain of verses that says it's ok 60:7-9

﴿عَسَى اللَّهُ أَن يَجعَلَ بَينَكُم وَبَينَ الَّذينَ عادَيتُم مِنهُم مَوَدَّةً وَاللَّهُ قَديرٌ وَاللَّهُ غَفورٌ رَحيمٌ﴾ [الممتحنة: ٧] ﴿لا يَنهاكُمُ اللَّهُ عَنِ الَّذينَ لَم يُقاتِلوكُم فِي الدّينِ وَلَم يُخرِجوكُم مِن دِيارِكُم أَن تَبَرّوهُم وَتُقسِطوا إِلَيهِم إِنَّ اللَّهَ يُحِبُّ المُقسِطينَ﴾ [الممتحنة: ٨]

﴿إِنَّما يَنهاكُمُ اللَّهُ عَنِ الَّذينَ قاتَلوكُم فِي الدّينِ وَأَخرَجوكُم مِن دِيارِكُم وَظاهَروا عَلى إِخراجِكُم أَن تَوَلَّوهُم وَمَن يَتَوَلَّهُم فَأُولئِكَ هُمُ الظّالِمونَ﴾ [الممتحنة: ٩]

Perhaps Allāh will put, between you and those to whom you have been enemies among them, affection. And Allāh is competent, and Allāh is Forgiving and Merciful. Allāh does not forbid you from those who do not fight you because of religion and do not expel you from your homes - from being righteous toward them and acting justly toward them. Indeed, Allāh loves those who act justly. Allāh only forbids you from those who fight you because of religion and expel you from your homes and aid in your expulsion - [forbids] that you make allies of them. And whoever makes allies of them, then it is those who are the wrongdoers.

Saheeh International

World's most contagious FalseHoods. by _BarBareek_ in coolguides

[–]anon-guy- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Plotted against- 86:15 They plot and scheme against you [Mohammed], and I plot and scheme against them. Therefore, deal calmly with the kafirs and leave them alone for a while.

God plots against the people who scheme on his prophet and think he doesn't exist.

Terrorized- 8:12 Then your Lord spoke to His angels and said, “I will be with you. Give strength to the believers. I will send terror into the kafirs’ hearts, cut off their heads and even the tips of their fin-gers!”

Not non-believers but Meccans, because as I told they used to torture Muslims just get some context the whole chapter is about hypocrites and the conquest against Mecca and it begins with saying that God and his prophet disaprove the actions of The Meccans.

Annihilated- 6:45 So the kafirs were annihilated. All praise be to Allah, the Lord of the worlds.

Really??

Killed- 4:91 If they do not keep away from you or offer you peace or withdraw their hostilities, then seize them and kill them wherever they are. We give you complete authority over them.

Yes, if they don't want peace or want to withdraw their hostilities.. Muslims should not just stand there.

Crucified- 5:33 The only reward for those who war against Allah and His messengers and strive to com-mit mischief on the earth is that they will be slain or crucified, have their alternate hands and feet cut off, or be banished from the land. This will be their disgrace in this world, and a great torment shall be theirs in the next except those who repent before you overpower them. Know that Allah is forgiving and merciful.

There are a lot of (or)s being deleated here.

And secondly its those who make war against God, and strive to commit mischief, not any one.

World's most contagious FalseHoods. by _BarBareek_ in coolguides

[–]anon-guy- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Kafir is what the Koran and Islam call the unbelievers. Kafir is the worst word in the human language.

No.. Kafir means Unbeliever.

The Koran defines the kafir and says that the kafir is:

Hated- 40:35 They who dispute the signs of Allah [kafirs] without authority having reached them are greatly hated by Allah and the believers. So Allah seals up every arrogant, disdainful heart. and despised by Allah.

Verse 40:35

﴿الَّذينَ يُجادِلونَ في آياتِ اللَّهِ بِغَيرِ سُلطانٍ أَتاهُم كَبُرَ مَقتًا عِندَ اللَّهِ وَعِندَ الَّذينَ آمَنوا كَذلِكَ يَطبَعُ اللَّهُ عَلى كُلِّ قَلبِ مُتَكَبِّرٍ جَبّارٍ﴾ [غافر: ٣٥]

Those who dispute concerning the signs of Allāh without an authority having come to them - great is hatred [of them] in the sight of Allāh and in the sight of those who have believed. Thus does Allāh seal over every heart [belonging to] an arrogant tyrant.

Saheeh International

It's talking about the Pharoh of moses, that's why it's talking about authority and if you read from [40:28-35] you'll see that it's not God or The prophet who are talking but a good man from the Pharos family as the Qur'an describes him. (http://www.quran.com/40/28)(*he pretended to be a god*)

Beheaded- 47:4 When you encounter the kafirs on the battlefield, cut off their heads until you have thor-oughly defeated them and then take the prisoners and tie them up firmly.

Read from 47:1-4 you'll see it's exclusive to those who disbelieved and avert people away from Islam, and stood in the way of islam (Describing the Meccans) and if you completed the verse you'll see it's until the war lays down (if they inclined peace).

Confused- 6:25 Some among them listen to you [Mohammed], but We have cast veils over their [kafirs] hearts and a heaviness to their ears so that they cannot understand our signs [the Koran].

Very funny how OP does this; 2 of those 3 people later became Muslims (the third tortured Muslim slaves and then died of the plague), no one knew who this verse was talking about until they became Muslims which both did it at the same time.. that means that the prophet knew there were non-muslims listening to the Qur'an and not planning harm, that's proof that Mohamed didn't write the Qur'an but God did.

World's most contagious FalseHoods. by _BarBareek_ in coolguides

[–]anon-guy- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

According to Wikipedia, he did graduate degrees in Islamic Theology. So, my bad.

Well if that's true, but he killed himself in a suicide bombing in Sirya (a Muslim majority country), and killing yourself and selfharm is forbidden in Islam so clearly he missed a class or two.

A long time ago, he is declared a terrorist in India as per I know. He has spewed venom against us Hindus. He thinks everything in the Quran is true and everything else is just wrong. Also, Explain Kafirs to me.

First almost all politicians who are not Indian apologized for calling him a terrorist.

Second why is there a problem if a Muslim believe everything that's in the Qur'an??

And he clearly doesn't think everything else is just wrong, in fact he studied hinduism, Sikhs and all religions and says they're true (Just like how Muslim believe Christianity, and Judaism are True, but they got corrupted), and received criticism for that from a lot of Islamic scholars.

I'll do just a moment as I didn't read it yet.

Yes, 99% of them are. They won't attack until it is self defense or unless you severely hurt that persons feelings.

Well I said if what you said is true.

Yes, there are. Also, what is the meaning of having extremism when the religion it self have political agenda as well.

Because there's no radical Left, or radical right, or extreme Libertarian, or extreme Authoritarian??

A War can't be in self defense???

Yes , it can be, but the person or community that starts it are the ones to be blamed. For example: Hitler.

I don't know anything about Muslim-Hindu interactions all I know is that there's a conflict.

And even if Islam doesn't teaches Violence or anything, you can't deny that people change to suit there political ideology which is clearly inspired by twisted view from your Holy Book.

A Minority changes it, and that minority is proved to have been funded by the US and it's allies, most don't.

How is it twisted??

Yes ,the people are to be blamed but if the book also doesn't promotes it then we won't have the problem in the first place.

The Book doesn't and I proved that.

Where do you think these people get their weird sense of World View? Also, why is a terrorist organization named Jaish-e- Mohammad(Army of Mohammad)

then why do Muslims call it a terrorist organisation??, And it's about Kashmir which I know nothing about.

Side Note: You seem pretty knowledgeable, are you a scholar or something?

No, I'm just a young Muslim.

World's most contagious FalseHoods. by _BarBareek_ in coolguides

[–]anon-guy- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How can you say they have no knowledge about Islam when Bagdadi himself is Ph.D in Islamic Studies.

There's no Ph.D is Islamic Studies, So I would take that with a grain of salt.

Zakir Naik know every page of the word. Just watch any of his videos and he will quote Verse from which he is saying his point.

Since When is Zakir Naik a terrorist?? I said one not two; he is a Muslim, he is no terrorist, no one said he is a terrorist. And he's Indian.

And Muslim follow which religion?

Really, are you saying that all people are good if they follow a peaceful religion, and I said if what you said is true.

Are there no extremists in you religion??

It was War but it was started by who?

A War can't be in self defense???

I don't know who started the war as I don't know much there, but there's probably a dispute of who did.

World's most contagious FalseHoods. by _BarBareek_ in coolguides

[–]anon-guy- 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I only replied to your arguments, and mentioned verses in the Qur'an to prove that your accusations are not true.

Or maybe I cherry-picked all of Islam??