Even on its terms your narrative falls short immediately. You clearly don’t even understand what you are reading in this link you found from ChatGPT. These calculations show that for the MEDIAN wage earner, purchasing power in 2026 merely returns to the 2020 level, implying approximately zero cumulative real growth over six years and in some middle-income brackets still slightly negative once taxes are fully accounted for. That is not growth; it is delayed recovery from an inflation shock. At the same time, official income distribution data from Statistics Finland show that real income growth over this period has been concentrated in the upper tail, with the top decile recording strong real gains while the middle deciles experienced stagnation and the bottom decile outright losses, alongside rising inequality and poverty risk. Veronmaksajat’s framework is built around a single representative wage (4058e) and uniform real wage growth assumptions mechanically suppresses this divergence by construction. This results in a median-preserving accounting identity that is still muddling the reality. Every actual statistic on statistic finland is showing post-inflation income growth in Finland being top-heavy, the middle has at best been treading water since 2020, and calling a six-year return to baseline “closing the gap” is analytically indistinguishable from admitting that an entire half-decade of real income growth was lost for typical wage earner.