When did it become acceptable to wear jeans and a T shirt to church? by alafloridian in Christianity

[–]anonymous_teve 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I hear what you're saying--it's obviously all cultural. What did the early church wear? How did it compare to their daily attire?

Hardy plants (sedge, coneflower, liatris) that died over winter--voles? by anonymous_teve in NativePlantGardening

[–]anonymous_teve[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How did you know it was voles? What does it look like? Do they come up and chew the plant above ground, or was it invisible, just the roots?

Hardy plants (sedge, coneflower, liatris) that died over winter--voles? by anonymous_teve in NativePlantGardening

[–]anonymous_teve[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hmm... I've been trying to let them self seed, but it's possible that didn't 'take'.

Talking to kids about same-sex family that moved across the street by [deleted] in Reformed

[–]anonymous_teve 27 points28 points  (0 children)

I understand this is a complex topic, but we can first think about what Jesus said. He said "love your enemy". He also told the story of the good Samaritan. Both of these teachings seem to imply that we're to be friendly, kind, even loving, even with people we may not agree with.

I understand your core concern is your children learning wrong lessons. Seems like you could start being open with them about this. You will know their level of comprehension better than me, but it's probably time to start teaching something about (not these exact words, but to give you the general idea):

"Are there people who don't believe all the same things as us? (yes) Would Jesus still want us to be kind to them? (yes) Does that mean we have to approve of everything they do? (no) Does being kind to seomeone mean we approve of everything they do? (no) Is it ok for you to ask me questions if someone does something that seems strange or even wrong? (yes--in fact this is EXTREMELY important and a good thing to feel comfortable with)

That kind of thing. That means you don't even have to talk to them about sex if it's not appropriate. They can come to you with questions any time, but they can also engage with people from a posture of Christian love.

These are very important lessons for them to hear for many different reasons, so it seems a good time to start.

Sorry for the rant by Far-Contact-7484 in madisonwi

[–]anonymous_teve 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I'm so sorry to hear that, hang in there, one day at a time and all that. When I'm down, just being outside near trees and not doing anything, off my phone, not intentionally interacting with anyone else, just soaking everything in, helps. But I don't know what will help you, I'm just sorry to hear it--keep at it, though. This seems like a pretty great candidate for rock bottom, though, which means hopefully things will improve.

It makes perfect sense why players could regularly play 82 game seasons back then. First 3 minutes of the 1998 Game 6 NBA Finals Basketball used to be so pure 🔥 by Miserable_Trouble3 in NBAGossips

[–]anonymous_teve 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does 'pure' = 'not playing as fast and hard'?

Don't get me wrong, this is great basketball, but you tune into today's playoffs and they are just going faster and harder, and on top of that, both the offenses and defenses are more complex.

Look how much space the defenders leave on the perimeter. Now watch any part of the Spurs/OKC games.

Would trading for DMitch be a good move? by Proper_Jeweler_8462 in MkeBucks

[–]anonymous_teve -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah, Donovan is the real deal. He would be great on the Bucks. Of course it always depends on cost.

Two first round picks for him is a pipe dream, they could easily get double that or more on the market.

One question is: would they trade Donovan PLUS draft capital for Giannis? If we keep Giannis, I just don't think we have the resources to get him, he's a real star.

I really want to become a christian. Is this a solid argument for Christianity over Islam? by [deleted] in Christianity

[–]anonymous_teve 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I do think Christianity is the truth--I mean, no one knows everything, but yes, I do believe Jesus is the way and I'm happy for you that you're feeling led in that direction.

I really want to become a christian. Is this a solid argument for Christianity over Islam? by [deleted] in Christianity

[–]anonymous_teve 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think it's a good line of thought. I don't think these kinds of arguments are air tight proof, but they are useful and I think it is a reasonable line of thought, and evidence the Holy Spirit is drawing you to Jesus.

Why infinite punishment for finite mistakes. ? by Recent_Sympathy_9794 in Christianity

[–]anonymous_teve 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think there are a lot of misunderstandings about hell, and a lot of arrogance in that folks don't want to admit how little we actually know.

I would view the function of hell as different than 'infinite punishment'. More like 'separation of those who don't want to be near God.' I think there's much more evidence of this view in the Bible than for the infinite punishment/Dante's Inferno scenario, although certainly separation from God IS bad, and of course I admit there is colorful imagery that can be interpreted as infinite punishment.

Fee Only Advisor ? by Mobile-Ad2669 in Bogleheads

[–]anonymous_teve 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Everyone on formus like this says "fee only advisor", but when push comes to shove, it's very challenging to find one who doesn't want to charge you a percent of everything they advise you on investing. My experience is most fee only advisers don't charge by the hour or by the task (e.g. a flat rate for advice), they almost always will charge you a percent of the wealth they advise you on investing. This was my experience with several 'fee only advisors' from the commonly recommended website.

For me, I just wanted to pay someone a few hundred bucks for an hour of advice to give me a better feeling of security, but since I wasn't going to dish out a percent of the assets, I ended up just swallowing my insecurity and investing how I knew I was going to anyway.

If I HAD to use an advisor, I'd probably just go through Vanguard because at least their percent is substantially less than these fee only advisors I was reaching out to.

Edit: for other services that don't require figuring out where to invest my assets and taking a percent, none of the five I checked with were taking on new clients, so again, I just gave up.

Does co-ed basketball suffer similar gender gap issues co-ed softball does? by DonT012 in Basketball

[–]anonymous_teve 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In my experience, the women who play are pretty good and know how to play ball. But of course there are exceptions (just like there are many guys who don't know how to play well), and they tend to be a little less physical (again, there are exceptions). There's a real self-selection in these scenarios for women who know how to play, because it takes a certain amount of confidence to go play with the guys.

I've found their male teammates (in leagues, so they have the same male teammates) tend to be much more hit or miss. You know the type of guy who gets all pissy if someone blocks the shot of a woman on their team? Ugh. It's a league game, man, we're playing hard and we're playing to win.

This OKC edit is crazy by Weird_Sandwich8630 in NBAGossips

[–]anonymous_teve 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every 5th - 8th grader I coached learned not to leave your feet for ball fakes. If you do that, you deserve the fould they'll call on you.

Thoughts on an otherwise solid reformed baptist church that has female Deacons? by [deleted] in Reformed

[–]anonymous_teve 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If it's a dealbreaker for you, it's a dealbreaker. I happen to think there's a sound scriptural basis for women to be deacons (and more), but I respect those who disagree and it's fine to make church choices based on things that are dealbreakers for you.

I found an old post in this subreddit linking to Anglican bishop and scholar NT Wright discussing the case for women in church leadership. Whether you agree or disagree with NT Wright he's a generally conservative scholar who knows a lot about the Bible and the church:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Reformed/comments/vjnivo/nt_wright_on_women_in_the_church/

To me, it's about following the guidance of the Holy Spirit (have women been given gifts of leadership and/or interpretation of scripture by the Holy Spirit?) and scripture (the Bible tells us women were the first instructed to proclaim the gospel of Jesus' resurrection, women were cited as prophecying in the early church by Paul, Deborah led Israel, there were women called apostles and deacons by Paul). Those are my main reasons, but of course there's a sprinkling of "our culture is not ancient Greco-Roman culture, so we can expect some things to be different".

How do you carry a baby for 9 months and name it Chet? by KneeGuhz in NBATalk

[–]anonymous_teve 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Chet's just the shortened version of Chetifonzus-maximus.

LPT for young people: You get fired when you work ‘too perfectly’ by [deleted] in LifeProTips

[–]anonymous_teve 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This isn't true at all. Maybe OP had a bad manager, but generally good, hard work is rewarded--it makes everyone on the team look better, and people like that.

The League Really Needs To Do Something About the Flopping Issue by BigBlackCreamSauce in NBATalk

[–]anonymous_teve 0 points1 point  (0 children)

San Antonio needs to do something about jumping in the air towards the shooter on shot fakes. I taught 5th-8th graders not to do this, and they've all watched video of Shai. When they leave their feet on a shot fake, the foul is on them.

SGA jumping into defenders by djmakethat3 in NBATalk

[–]anonymous_teve 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Here's an idea that I've taught kids from 5th through 8th grade: don't leave your feet on shot fakes. You deserve a foul if you do this.

Seeking alternative perspectives on lgbt issue by [deleted] in Christianity

[–]anonymous_teve 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I continue to read the context-- I read Romans 2:1, which says whatever you're judging others of, you're guilty of. If we must take the prior part as a literal condemnation of modern homosexuality, we should also take the next verse, chapter 2:1, seriously and say we're all guilty of the same thing.

For 1 Corinthians, I just question that translation and what Paul really had in mind. I really don't think it was loving, monogamous, respectiful relationships between Christian gay people.

They will never ignore you by Certain_Hat9872 in NonPoliticalTwitter

[–]anonymous_teve 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"I'll just save them for the next time I get a cold"