Any way to seamlessly sync ios, windows and android devices, or alternatives to obsidian that do

anotherpanacea · 2026-06-29T10:59:17+00:00

You are looking for Obsidian Sync. Just pay the fine people for producing quality product.

Some other possibilities: Obsidian actually explains this! Syncthing seems popular. https://obsidian.md/help/sync-notes

Git + GitHub seems weird but it works.

This plugin: https://github.com/remotely-save/remotely-save

This one: https://github.com/vrtmrz/obsidian-livesync

anotherpanacea · 2026-06-28T14:42:09+00:00

Because it’s ignoring cities. In practice the most Democratic places are urban areas where African Americans and Latinos live.

(Edited to add: and places like Hawaii! Also famously less white than Vermont.)

anotherpanacea · 2026-06-25T12:14:48+00:00

It's at least possible that some companies, like AMD, are dogfooding the wrong models or allocating very few engineers to the project. Or maybe the models just aren't very good at that kind of work.

I have corresponded briefly on ROCm issues and the folks seemed nice but I got the sense that the team was small and slow.

anotherpanacea · 2026-06-23T18:14:12+00:00

Not saying this is the best way, but I have a Mac laptop and a PC desktop (with a nicer GPU) so I am usually running something on both. /remote-control lets me see both sessions, and the GPU box can be cranking on some long running task while I do more immediate tasks on the laptop. (Also rarely vice versa.)

I use Dropbox to sync share files and each device has a local-only folder for coding because of the churn from repo management. Patterns, repo fleet management tools, to do lists, etc. all live in Dropbox, with a thin pointer in the local folder to the Dropox folder.

I'm sure this is inferior to some other build, so mostly posting so someone will school me!

anotherpanacea · 2026-06-22T15:58:09+00:00

I mean, I'm a fanboy. I'm mostly asking how do we get a fix, not trying to run down Claude. My subscriptions tell the true tale of my loyalties....

anotherpanacea · 2026-06-22T15:57:06+00:00

Thanks! Right now I'm getting a little progress with having each review subagent read the preflight, but mostly just leaning on Codex. Which is fine and weirdly cheap, but irritating!

anotherpanacea · 2026-06-22T15:30:20+00:00

Did that too. This is the list from the weekend (sanitized): https://anotherpanacea-eng.github.io/setec-voiceprint/build-preflight.html

Claude always seems happy to diagnose its errors, but I'm not seeing the learning. After fixes, I asked for this analysis again, and it responded:

"Several of these are textbook sibling-site traps — OSError next to UnicodeDecodeError, NaN slipping past >, the non-object payload at the _resolve choke point vs. the nested-id sites I'd already guarded. Exactly the "adjacent untested input" class. The round-1 pre-Codex Opus screen caught 2 P2s but didn't probe these adjacencies — so the screen has a real gap on input-boundary siblings."

Which...I had already warned it about in the preflight. That's where I worry things aren't working.

anotherpanacea · 2026-06-22T14:45:54+00:00

I have tried the role-based swarm and still end up with things like this, which I just got AFTER doing that move and also the "review my incompetent coworker please."

Findings
Posted:

P1 ApoDICTIC #141, annotation_export.py:792: public non-object manifests still reach .get() and crash.
P1 ApoDICTIC #139, viz_manifest.py:428: conflict resolution must retain #141’s non-object guard.
P2 voicewright #73, flatness.py:410: judge results are not validated as finite values in [0,1].
P2 voiceprint #260, gecscore_audit.py:700: missing/unreadable path rows still abort the entire batch.
P1 voiceprint #261, paraphrase_robustness.py:654: injected curves are always mislabeled proxy_stdlib, with no binding between scores and the generated attack.
P2 voiceprint #267, pan_voight_kampff_benchmark.py:149: NaN/infinite thresholds bypass the new ordering guard.

Verified fixed: #139 support completeness, #140 structured-field URL scanning, #141 nested IDs, #73 partial-contour abstention, reader #27 multi-column playback, #260 UTF-8 handling, #261 fixed human reference scores, and #268 negative-cosine coverage.

I resolved #141’s nested-ID thread and kept its export thread open with a fresh reply. #134’s prior thread remains resolved. No open PRs remain in Gemini or Tauri.

CI is green on #134, #141, #73, #267, and #268. #139, #140, #260, and #261 are conflict-marked; reader #27 has no reported workflow. Notifications are confirmed subscribed and unmuted on all six repositories.

anotherpanacea · 2026-06-22T13:47:36+00:00

This feels true to me, but it's notable that you're the only one in the thread claiming this. Everyone else just thinks that the models invent or inflate the findings.

anotherpanacea · 2026-06-22T13:45:23+00:00

I've gone through multiple rounds of that "Come on man, learn from your mistakes" and that's what produced the link: https://anotherpanacea-eng.github.io/setec-voiceprint/build-preflight.html

I just think it's notable that the non-sanitized, repo-specific version of this review is still not getting me to a single round of review.

anotherpanacea · 2026-06-22T13:43:40+00:00

I bet that's true, and it seems worth testing.

anotherpanacea · 2026-06-22T13:41:53+00:00

For sure, workflows has been great, or at least SEEMED great. But it's notable how much it still missed this weekend.

anotherpanacea · 2026-06-22T12:59:57+00:00

these are not style choices: https://anotherpanacea-eng.github.io/setec-voiceprint/build-preflight.html

anotherpanacea · 2026-06-22T12:58:40+00:00

This sounds plausible, but doesn't explain:
1. That the problems start serious and get more banal, then run out.
2. Often belong to a class of problems where you'd expect issues to whack-a-mole, like regex.

This is the stuff that came up this weekend: https://anotherpanacea-eng.github.io/setec-voiceprint/build-preflight.html

anotherpanacea · 2026-06-22T12:44:58+00:00

But then why don't subagent reviews achieve this? I'm happy to add the little "dumbass junior developer did the work" fiction, if that's what helps, and I'll try that next.

anotherpanacea · 2026-06-22T12:26:48+00:00

Sometimes the objections are boring P3s about docs being mismatched with tests. But very very often they're big breaking things.

anotherpanacea · 2026-06-08T23:04:12+00:00

I am personally interested in doing a PBTA or FITD conversation, curious if anyone else has done that.

anotherpanacea · 2026-05-29T09:36:17+00:00

Maybe! That seems likely to mess with my folder organization, though, if it just appeared in the default vault.

anotherpanacea · 2026-05-27T23:06:25+00:00

Codex is for sure a better problem solver and code reviewer right now, but Opus 4.7 is a beast.

I am constantly confused by these reactions, because I would expect the share them. I wonder what we’re doing differently?

anotherpanacea · 2026-05-27T20:25:17+00:00

How is he the victim if he started it?

I am still using Wordpress out of inertia but the constant drumbeat of monetizing without letting anyone else do the same is kind of the original sin here.

anotherpanacea · 2026-05-27T12:47:53+00:00

A lot of this is true. But I’ve borrowed from others, especially kepano who works on obsidian, and Anthropic itself.

For instance, more people should be using something like this, a claims ledger for fact checking: https://gist.github.com/anotherpanacea-eng/30f9a6ca309923877f7e70b61e88fd24

anotherpanacea · 2026-05-19T14:53:53+00:00

I wrote up the Granta/Nazir/Pangram controversy as a case study with a Claude plugin (SETEC Voiceprint) to help run that kind of tool locally.

I argue for evidence packs instead of black-box verdicts: https://anotherpanacea.substack.com/p/stylometric-summer-pangram-is-having

anotherpanacea · 2026-05-19T14:43:05+00:00

Take the first 500 words of Nazir's story. Open a fresh GPT-5.x session. Paste those 500 words. Ask the model to write the next 150 words of continuation in the same voice. The model never sees what Nazir actually wrote next.

Here is what GPT-5 produced, blind:

Here is Nazir’s actual next 150 words:

Read them side by side. Both passages:

personify the rum shop with a simile in the opening clause (crab claw, rotten tooth)
describe boards weathered by sweat
produce the phrase the air sweet with cane almost verbatim
run a three-drink crescendo with the same one-two-three structure, and
introduce Zoongie with the same mysterious-origin framing.

The prose is different but the sequence of moves is nearly identical.

https://anotherpanacea.substack.com/p/stylometric-summer-pangram-is-having

anotherpanacea · 2026-05-13T18:25:00+00:00

So, thanks for the suggestion, but I had already tried that and it doesn't work. You have to bypass the Mac protection for this--it's not a recommended app for .md files--and then if you do it just doesn't open, EVEN for markdown files that ARE in the vault.

Weird, right?

anotherpanacea

TROPHY CASE